Phase Congruency and Its Application to Tubular Structure Extraction

  • Xiaojuan Deng
  • Hongwei LiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 506)


With the development of computerized tomography, nondestructive testing technology has been widely utilized in the industry. In this paper, we try to extract the cracks contained in certain kind of workpieces from the industry, so as to predict their usability and left lifetime. The cracks are in tubular form in two-dimensional images, and many traditional tubular structure extraction methods show various difficulties in real applications. The main contribution of this paper is that an approach combining the phase congruency (PC) and phase symmetry is proposed to extract the tubular structures. Experiments on a kind of 3D workpieces from the industry against other popular methods are performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.



Thanks for the support of the Natural National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61371195). And the authors are grateful to Beijing Higher Institution Engineering Research Center of Testing and Imaging as well as Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology for funding this research work.


  1. 1.
    Adams R, Bischof L (1994) Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16(6):641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL et al (1998) Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 130–137Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krissian K, Malandain G, Ayache N et al (2000) Model-based detection of tubular structures in 3D images. Comput Vis Image Underst 80(2):130–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer C, Simpson H (2010) Segmentation of 3D tubular tree structures in medical images.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Talbot H, Najman L, Passat N (2014) Tubular structure filtering by ranking the orientation responses of path operators. Lect Notes Comput Sci 8690:203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merveille O, Talbot H, Najman L et al (2016) Tubular structure analysis by ranking the orientation responses of path operatorsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kovesi P (1996) Invariant measures of image features from phase information. University of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kovesi P (1999) Image features from phase congruency. Videre J Comput Vis Res 1(3):1–26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovesi P (2000) Phase congruency: a low-level image invariant. Psychol Res 64(2):136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kovesi P (2004) Matlab functions for computer vision and image analysis. School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morrone MC, Owens RA (1987) Feature detection from local energy. Pattern Recogn Lett 6(5):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovesi P (1997) Symmetry and asymmetry from local phase. In: Tenth Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence, Citeseer, vol 190, pp 2–4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM (2005) A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model Simul 4(2):490–530MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging TechnologyCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations