Virtually Empathetic?: Examining the Effects of Virtual Reality Storytelling on Empathy

  • EunSeo BangEmail author
  • Caglar Yildirim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10909)


Virtual reality is gaining attention as a new storytelling tool due to its ability to transport users into alternative realities. The current study investigated whether VR storytelling was a viable intervention for inducing a state of empathy. A short documentary about a prison inmate’s solitary confinement experiences, After Solitary, was shown to two groups of participants. One group watched the documentary on a commercial VR headset (Oculus Rift) and the other group on a desktop computer via a YouTube 360° video. Results indicated the two groups did not differ in their state empathy levels and in their sense of presence levels. This suggests that watching the documentary in VR was not substantially different from watching it on YouTube with respect to the extent to which an individual empathizes with the emotional experience of another person.


VR Empathy 360° video Affective empathy Cognitive empathy State empathy Trait empathy Immersion Presence Inmate rehabilitation 



The study was conducted in the SUNY Oswego VR First Lab, established through the academic partnership between VR First and SUNY Oswego. The authors would like to thank VR First for supporting the establishment and maintenance of the lab.


  1. 1.
    IDC: Worldwide Revenues for Augmented and Virtual Reality Forecast to Reach $162 Billion in 2020, According to IDC.
  2. 2.
    Merrill Lynch: Theme Watch (YA 2017: Year of Tech Disruption, Earth, & Millennials Themes).
  3. 3.
    Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J., Ferrer-García, M., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Moreno, E.: Body image in eating disorders: the influence of exposure to virtual-reality environments. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13, 521–531 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kampmann, I.L., Emmelkamp, P.M.G., Hartanto, D., Brinkman, W.-P., Zijlstra, B.J.H., Morina, N.: Exposure to virtual social interactions in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Behav. Res. Ther. 77, 147–156 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Navarro-Haro, M.V., López-del-Hoyo, Y., Campos, D., Linehan, M.M., Hoffman, H.G., García-Palacios, A., Modrego-Alarcón, M., Borao, L., García-Campayo, J.: Meditation experts try Virtual Reality Mindfulness: a pilot study evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of Virtual Reality to facilitate mindfulness practice in people attending a Mindfulness conference. PloS One 12, e0187777 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6, 603–616 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7, 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hogan, R.: Development of an empathy scale. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 33, 307–316 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shen, L.: On a scale of state empathy during message processing. West. J. Commun. 74, 504–524 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Decety, J., Jackson, P.L.: The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 3, 71–100 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Decety, J., Jackson, P.L.: A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15, 54–58 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell, R.G., Babrow, A.S.: The role of empathy in responses to persuasive risk communication: overcoming resistance to HIV prevention messages. Health Commun. 16, 159–182 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Preston, S.D., de Waal, F.B.M.: Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–20 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44, 113–126 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wijma, E.M., Veerbeek, M.A., Prins, M., Pot, A.M., Willemse, B.M.: A virtual reality intervention to improve the understanding and empathy for people with dementia in informal caregivers: results of a pilot study. Aging Ment. Health. 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Tsakiris, M.: Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 6–12 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A War Survivor’s Virtual Reality Film Brings the Terror of a Conflict Zone to Life – Creators.
  18. 18.
    Can virtual reality emerge as a tool for conservation?—Environment—The Guardian.
  19. 19.
    Peck, T.C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S.M., Slater, M.: Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 779–787 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10, 266–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Official, FRONTLINE PBS: After Solitary 360°—FRONTLINE.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of New York at OswegoOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations