Eversion carotid endarterectomy (ECEA) is an alternative method of plaque extirpation by oblique transection of the internal carotid artery at its origin near the carotid bifurcation and subsequent reimplantation of the ICA into the carotid bulb. Carotid duplex ultrasonography is currently the preferred imaging modality for the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis due to its safety, availability, and reliable results. Advantages of eversion versus standard endarterectomy include the ability to shorten a redundant ICA, better visualized end point and easier detection of intimal flaps, faster closure by simple anastomosis of the ICA to the carotid bulb, an all-autogenous reconstruction, and decreased restenosis rates in women. Although the eversion method has not shown superior results conclusively, ECEA allows for another reliable technique that should be in every vascular surgeon’s armamentarium for the surgical intervention of high-grade carotid occlusive disease.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
North American Symptomatic Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson RW 2nd, Mackey WC, Ascher E, Murad MH, Calligaro KD, Comerota AJ. Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(2):480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao PG, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Giordano G, Ricci S, Celani MG. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke (review). Cochrane Libr. 2008;3:1–36.Google Scholar
Kieny R, Hirsch D, Seiller C, Thiranos JC, Petit H. Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis? Ann Vasc Surg. 1993;7:407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Ahmed S, Daniel G, Benezit M, Ribal JP, Rosset E. Eversion carotid endarterectomy without shunt: concerning 1,385 consecutive cases. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;58(4):543–50.Google Scholar
Schneider JR, Helenowski IB, Jackson CR, Verta MJ, Zamor KC, Ptel NH, Kim S, Hoel AW. A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-American Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radak D, Tanaskovic S, Matic P, Babic S, Aleksic N, Ilijevski N. Eversion carotid endarterectomy—our experience after 20 years of carotid surgery and 9897 carotid endarterectomy procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26:924–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, Sergentanis TN, Liapis CD. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(6):751–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black JH 3rd, Ricotta JJ, Jones CE. Long-term results of eversion carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(1):92–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar