Advertisement

The Disengaging Beckettian Television Audience and the Monument to Loss

  • Michelle Chiang
Chapter
Part of the New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-First Century book series (NIBTFC)

Abstract

While attending to the fact that members of the audience are not a group of undifferentiated and passive people, we begin by examining how an average television viewer’s expectation to be entertained and/or informed as she turned on the television at home might have been subverted by the minimal mise-en-scène and lack of a clear plot in the television plays Eh Joe, Ghost Trio, Quad I + II, and … but the clouds…. The result is an uncomfortable uncertainty that may be translated into an experiential sense of loss. In the second half of the chapter, we explore how Beckett’s subscription to an aesthetic of loss could potentially remind the television audiences of their intrinsic state of disjunction.

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, Theodor. 1996. Commitment. In Marxist Literary Theory, ed. Terry Eagleton and Drew Milne, 187–203. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, Daniel. 2003. Beckett and Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baudrillard, Jean. 2001. The Precession of Simulacra. In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al., 1729–1741. London/New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, Samuel. 2006a. The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2006b. Proust. In The Grove Centenary Edition: Poems, Short Fiction, and Criticism of Samuel Beckett, ed. Paul Auster, vol. 4, 1st ed., 511–554. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2011. Letter to George Reavey, 18 November 1947. In The Letters of Samuel Beckett: 1941–1956, ed. George Craig, Martha Dow Fehsenfeld, and Dan Gunn, 64–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1959 RAI Prix Italia Prize Acceptance Speech. The Paris Review. http://theparisreview.tumblr.com/post/67861547345/listen-to-samuel-beckett-accept-the-prix-italia. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  9. Ben-Zvi, Linda. 1985. Samuel Beckett’s Media Plays. Modern Drama 28(1): 22–37. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_drama/v028/28.1.ben-zvi.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2014.
  10. ———. 2006. Beckett and Television: In a Different Context. Modern Drama 49(4): 469–490. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_drama/v049/49.4benzvi.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.
  11. Bignell, Jonathan. 2005. How to Watch Television?: Pedagogy and Paedocracy in Beckett’s Television Plays. In Historicising Beckett/Issues of Performance, Samuel Beckett Today/Samuel Beckett Aujourd’hui, ed. Marius Buning, Matthijs Engelberts, Sjef Houppermans, et al., vol. 15, 281–293. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2009. Beckett on Screen. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brecht, Bertolt. 2001. The Popular and the Realistic. In Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, 107–115. Trans. and ed. John Willett. Reading: Methuen.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, Julie. 2007. Endgame and Performance. In Samuel Beckett’s Endgame, ed. Mark S. Byron, 253–274. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. Coe, Richard N. 1982. Beckett’s English. In Samuel Beckett—Humanistic Perspectives, ed. Morris Beja et al., 36–57. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, Jonathan. 2001. Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences with Media Characters. Mass Communication and Society 4(3): 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01. Accessed 8 Dec 2013.
  17. Connor, Steven. 1998. Slow Going. Presentation, Critical Beckett Conference, University of Birmingham, September 26. http://www.stevenconnor.com/slow.htm. Accessed 28 Sept 2013.
  18. Dickason, Renée. 2011. Capturing the ‘Real’ in British Television Fiction: Experiments in/of Realism—An Abiding and Evolving Notion. Synthesis 3(Winter): 103–117. http://www.enl.uoa.gr/synthesis/issue3_Dickason.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  19. Duchaine, Bradley C., et al. 2003. Normal Recognition of Emotion in a Prosopagnosic. Perception 32: 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5067. Accessed 26 Sept 2013.
  20. Duguid, Mark. Night Out, A (1960). BFI Screenonline: The Definitive Guide to Britain’s Film and TV History. http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/946293/index.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2013.
  21. Ellacott, Vivyan. 1955: For Godot’s Sake! Audiences Storm Out. Rogues and Vagabonds: A Year-by-Year History of British Theatre from 1567. http://www.overthefootlights.co.uk/1955.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2013.
  22. Esslin, Martin. 1966. Brecht and the English Theatre. The Tulane Drama Review 11(2): 63–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1125186. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
  23. ———. 2004. The Theatre of the Absurd. 3rd ed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  24. Fifield, Peter. 2008. Beckett, Cotard’s Syndrome and the Narrative Patient. Journal of Beckett Studies 17: 169–186. http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/E0309520709000120. Accessed 30 Jan 2014.
  25. Fletcher, Beryl S., and John Fletcher. 1978. A Student’s Guide to the Plays of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  26. Gardner, Colin. 2012. Beckett Deleuze and the Televisual Event: Peephole Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson, Alan, and Samuel Beckett. (uncredited), dir. Eh Joe? British Film Institute, tx. 4/7/1966, video cassette.Google Scholar
  28. Gray, Jonathan, and Amanda D. Lotz. 2012. Television Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hargrave, Andrea Millwood, and Lucy Gatfield. 2002. Soap Box or Soft Soap?: Audience Attitudes to the British Soap Opera. Broadcasting Standards Commission, May, pp. 1–54. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/research/soap.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2013.
  30. Heathcote, Christopher. 2013. When Beckett Commissioned Giacometti. Quadrant Online. http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2013/1-2/when-beckett-commissioned-giacometti. Accessed 20 Sept 2013.
  31. Herren, Graley. 2010. Beckett on Television. In A Companion to Samuel Beckett, ed. S.E. Gontarski, 389–402. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Hobson, Dorothy. 1982. Crossroads: The Drama of the Soap Opera. London: Methuen London Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Jacoby, Russell. 1997. Social Amnesia: A Critique of Contemporary Psychology from Adler to Laing. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Jeffers, Jennifer M. 2009. Beckett’s Masculinity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowles, Ronald. 2009. Pinter and Twentieth Century Drama. In The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter, ed. Peter Raby, 2nd ed., 74–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohlmann, Benjamin. 2013. Awkward Moments: Melodrama, Modernism, and the Politics of Affect. PMLA 128(2): 337–352. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.337. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.
  37. Kott, Jan. 1966. A Note on Beckett’s Realism. Trans. Boleslaw Taborski. The Tulane Drama Review 10(3): 156–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1125170. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.
  38. Langer, Monika M. 1989. Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. London: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matoba, Junko. 2000. Religious Overtones in the Darkened Area of Beckett’s Later Short Plays. In Beckett and Religion, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, ed. Marius Buning, Matthijs Engelberts, and Onno Kosters, vol. 9, 31–42. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  40. Maude, Ulrika. 2009. ‘Crazy Inventions’: Beckett on TV. Journal of Beckett Studies 18: 1–9. http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/E0309520709000235. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
  41. McConachie, Bruce. 2013. Theatre and Mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McMullan, Anna. 1997. Versions of Embodiment/Visions of the Body in Beckett’s …but the clouds…. In Samuel Beckett: Crossroads and Borderlines/L’oeuvre Carrefour/L’oeuvre Limite, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, ed. Marius Buning, Matthijs Engelberts, and Onno Kosters, vol. 6, 353–364. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2010. Performing Embodiment in Samuel Beckett’s Drama. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. McQuail, Denis. 2005. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  45. McTighe, Trish. 2012. Noli Me Tangere: Haptic certitude in Beckett’s Eh Joe and Nacht und Traume. Modern Drama 55(2): 216–229. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_drama/v055/55.2.mctighe.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2013.
  46. McWhinnie, Donald, dir. 1977a. Ghost Trio. In Shades: Three Plays by Samuel Beckett. British Film Institute; VHS cassette 61.31-8006144A, TX date 1977-04-17, video cassette.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 1977b. …but the clouds…. In Shades: Three Plays by Samuel Beckett. British Film Institute, VHS cassette 61.31-8006144A, TX date 1977-04-17, video cassette.Google Scholar
  48. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2003. Phenomenology of Perception, Trans. Colin Smith. Reprint ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Nixon, Mark. 2011. Samuel Beckett’s German Diaries 1936–1937. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  50. O’Neill, John. 2002. Plato’s Cave: Television and Its Discontents. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  51. Peelan, Marius V. et al. 2009. Emotional Attention in Acquired Prosopagnosia. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 4(3): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp014. Accessed 26 Sept 2013.
  52. Perry, Nick. 1998. Hyperreality and Global Culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Plato. 2001. Republic, From Book VII. In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al., 64–67. London/New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  54. Radio Times. 1966. Vol 171/2225-1966, British Film Institute. Great Britain: BBC Worldwide, microfilm.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1977. Vol. 215/2788-1977, British Film Institute. Great Britain: BBC Worldwide, microfilm.Google Scholar
  56. Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Laila Craighero. 2005. Mirror Neuron: A Neurological Approach to Empathy. In Neurobiology of Human Values, ed. Jean-Pierre Changeux et al., 107–123. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schneider, Alan, dir. 1961. Waiting for Godot; WNTA-TV’s “Play of the Week.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=tOzQuBbBuK0. Accessed 4 Mar 2017.
  58. Sierz, Aleks. 2003. ‘A Relevant and Cinematographic Environment’: Filming Beckett’s Plays. In Three Dialogues Revisited, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, ed. Marius Buning, Matthijs Engelberts, Sjef Houppermans, et al., vol. 13, 137–149. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  59. Singer, Ben. 2001. Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2006. Objects of Consumption, Causes of Desire: Consumerism and Advertising in Societies of Commanded Enjoyment. Gramma/Γράμμα: Journal of Theory and Criticism 14: 83–105. http://www.enl.auth.gr/gramma/gramma06/stavrakakis.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2014.
  61. Taylor-Batty, Mark. 2014. How to Mourn: Kane, Pinter and Theatre as Monument to Loss in the 1990s. In Ethical Speculations in Contemporary British Theatre, ed. Mireia Aragay and Enric Monforte, 59–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wake, Oliver. Wednesday Play, The (1964–70): Long-running, often provocative BBC drama strand. BFI Screenonline: The Definitive Guide to Britain’s Film and TV History. http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/454700/. Accessed 23 Jan 2014.
  63. Weiss, Katherine. 2009. Animating Ghosts in Samuel Beckett’s Ghost Trio and …but the clouds…. Journal of Beckett Studies 18: 105–122. http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/E0309520709000302. Accessed 8 Apr 2014.
  64. ———. 2013. The Plays of Samuel Beckett. London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
  65. Zepf, Siegfried. 2010. Consumerism and Identity: Some Psychoanalytical Considerations. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 19(3): 144–154. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08037060903143992. Accessed 18 Feb 2014.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Chiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations