Advertisement

The Practices and Politics of a Relatable Brand

  • Akane Kanai
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on relatability as a branded relationship between bloggers and readers, and explores the associated practices required to maintain this relationship. In this public, presumptions of feminine commonality as ‘girlfriends’ underpin this branded relation. Producing the self as a relatable brand requires discipline and responsiveness, in order to produce the intimacy that facilitates the branded relationship between blogger and unknown audiences. It also requires the ability to articulate the personal as the general, in producing moments that are both representative of the self but also feminine experience that may be considered ‘common’ and ‘relatable’. Such generality associated with relatability, however, does not mean that the status of being relatable is universally available. Relatability is conceived of as a possessive attribute. General experience is conceived of as something that can be operationalised to demonstrate individual value, if cited with the right degree of specificity and in the correct affective tone. This conception of the self as representative of general experience must also be located within histories of whiteness and class privilege.

Keywords

Branding Value Discipline Representation Whiteness Class 

References

  1. Adkins, Lisa. 2003. “Reflexivity: Freedom or Habit of Gender?” Theory, Culture and Society 20 (6): 21–42.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, Lisa. 2016. “Contingent Labour and the Rewriting of the Sexual Contract.” In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency, edited by Lisa Adkins and Maryanne Dever, 1–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2012. Authentic TM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baym, Nancy. 2015. “Connect With Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection.” The Communication Review 18 (1): 14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, James L., Matt Groening, and Sam Simon. 1989. The Simpsons. United States: 20th Television.Google Scholar
  7. Carah, Nicholas, Sven Brodmerkel, and Lorena Hernandez. 2014. “Brands and Sociality: Alcohol Branding, Drinking Culture and Facebook.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20 (3): 259–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514531531.
  8. Casserly, Meghan. 2012. “#WhatShouldWeCallMe Revealed: The 24-Year Old Law Students Behind The New Tumblr Darling.” Last Modified March 29. http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/03/29/whatshouldwecallme-revealed-24-year-old-law-students-tumblr-darling/. Accessed March 25.
  9. Cho, Alexander. 2011. “Queer Tumblrs, Networked Counterpublics.” Conference PapersInternational Communication Association, 1–37.Google Scholar
  10. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2016. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coté, Mark, and Jennifer Pybus. 2012. “Learning to Immaterial Labour 2.0: MySpace and Social Networks.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 7 (1): 88–106.Google Scholar
  12. Daniels, Greg, and Michael Schur. 2009. Parks and Recreation. United States: NBC Universal Television Distribution.Google Scholar
  13. du Plessis, Erik Mygind and Pelle Korsbæk, Sørensen. 2017. “An Interview with Arlie Russell Hochschild: Critique and the Sociology of Emotions: Fear, Neoliberalism and the Acid Rainproof Fish.” Theory, Culture and Society 34 (7–8): 181–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417739113.
  14. Farci, Manolo, Lucca Rossi, Giovanni Bocci Artieri, and Fabio Giglietto. 2017. “Networked Intimacy. Intimacy and Friendship Among Italian Facebook Users.” Information, Communication and Society 20 (5): 784–801.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1203970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fjær, Eivind Grip, Willy Pedersen, and Sveinung Sandberg. 2015. “‘I’m Not One of Those Girls’: Boundary-Work and the Sexual Double Standard in a Liberal Hookup Context.” Gender & Society 29 (6): 960–981.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hemmings, Clare. 2012. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hochschild, Arlie. 1983/2003. The Managed Heart: The Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jarrett, Kylie. 2015. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kalish, Rachel, and Michael Kimmel. 2011. “Hooking Up: Hot Hetero Sex or the New Numb Normative?” Australian Feminist Studies 26 (67): 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2011.546333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lederer, Charles. 1953. Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. United States: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
  21. Lury, Celia. 2009. Brand as Assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy 2 (1–2): 67–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McNay, L. 1999. “Gender, Habitus and the Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Limits of Reflexivity.” Theory, Culture & Society 16 (1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakamura, Lisa. 2008. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ronen, Shelly. 2010. “Grinding On the Dance Floor: Gendered Scripts and Sexualized Dancing at College Parties.” Gender & Society 24 (3): 355–377.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210369894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma, Sarah. 2017. “Exit and the Extensions of Man.” Transmediale. https://transmediale.de/content/exit-and-the-extensions-of-man. Accessed December 1, 2018.
  26. Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Stacey, Jackie. 1987. “Desperately Seeking Difference: Desire Between Women in Narrative Cinema.” Screen 28 (1): 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sullivan, Shannon. 2006. Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sullivan, Shannon. 2014. Good White People: The Problem with Middle Class White Anti-Racism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  30. Swan, Elaine. 2017. “What are White People to Do? Listening, Challenging Ignorance, Generous Encounters and the ‘Not Yet’ as Diversity Research Praxis.” Gender, Work & Organization 24 (5): 547–563.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text 18 (2): 33–58.  https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiegman, Robyn, and Elizabeth A. Wilson. 2015. “Introduction: Antinormativity’s Queer Conventions.” Differences 26 (1): 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2880582.
  33. Winch, Alison. 2013. Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yancy, George. 2012. Look, a White! Philosophical Essays on Whiteness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akane Kanai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Media, Film and JournalismMonash UniversityCaulfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations