Advertisement

Intimacy and Value: Telling the Self Through Figures

  • Akane Kanai
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I use a figurative analysis in discussing how figures of the best friend, the Other girl, the hot guy, creep, and the boyfriend affectively circulate in the WSWCM public. Summoning a host of easily recognisable affects, narratives and consequences, these figures are invoked to tell a story about the self in ways that alternately suggest valuable affective qualities of resilience, moderation, likeability and desirability. The dialectical relation between the best friend and Other girl tells the self in terms of the ability to oscillate between desirable feminine affects such as warmth and care, but also discernment, and disciplinary judgment. While best friends mirror a normative self, Other girls are positioned as always on the ‘extremities’ and thus outside the boundaries of ‘normal’ femininity. The hot guy, boyfriend and the creep allow the self to be told in terms of active heterosexual desire as well as desirability. However, in keeping with the requirement to demonstrate an affective ‘moderation’, bloggers avow the problems in being able to successfully approach heterosexual love interests at the same time as demonstrating a taken-for-granted competency in evaluating and rejecting undeserving masculinities. The use of figures showcases the ability to balance relationships and their associated affects, and in doing so, tell the self in terms of individual relatable value.

Keywords

Figurative analysis Self Heterosexuality Girlfriendship Relationships Hook up culture 

References

  1. ‘America’s Next Top Model.’ 2003. United States: CBS Television Distribution.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, Andrew. 2007. Shrek the Third. United States: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Human Rights Commission. 2017. Change the Course: National Report on Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment at Australian Universities. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Bays, Carter, and Craig Thomas. 2005. How I Met Your Mother. United States: 20th Television.Google Scholar
  6. Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. 2006. Gender Trouble. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  8. Carell, Steve. 2005. The 40 Year Old Virgin. United States: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, Richard, Andrew Davies, and Helen Fielding. 2001. Bridget Jones’ Diary. UK, France, USA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson, Amy Shields. 2011. “The Representation of Female Friendships on Young Women’s MySpace Profiles: The All-Female world and the Feminine ‘Other’.” In Youth Culture and Net Culture: Online Social Practices, edited by E. Dunkels, G. M. Franberg, and C. Hallgren. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  11. Dobson, Amy Shields. 2012. “‘Individuality Is Everything’: ‘Autonomous’ Femininity in MySpace Mottos and Self-descriptions.” Continuum 26 (3):371–383.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. du Gay, Paul. 1996. Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Eleftheriou-Smith, Loulla-Mae. 2015. “Bic Apologises for Sexist ‘Think Like a Man’ Advert Designed to Celebrate Women’s Day.” Last Modified August 11. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/bic-apologises-for-sexist-think-like-a-man-advert-designed-to-celebrate-south-africa-womens-day-10449842.html, Accessed September 19, 2016.
  14. Farvid, Panteá, Virginia Braun, and Casey Rowney. 2016. “‘No Girl Wants to Be Called a Slut!’: Women, Heterosexual Casual Sex and the Sexual Double Standard.” Journal of Gender Studies: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818.
  15. Fey, Tina. 2004. Mean Girls. United States: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  16. Fjær, Eivind Grip, Willy Pedersen, and Sveinung Sandberg. 2015. ““I’m Not One of Those Girls”: Boundary-Work and the Sexual Double Standard in a Liberal Hookup Context.” Gender & Society 29 (6): 960–981.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hurwitz, Mitchell. 2003. Arrested Development. United States: 20th Television.Google Scholar
  19. Jarrett, Kylie. 2015. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Kalish, Rachel, and Michael Kimmel. 2011. “Hooking Up: Hot Hetero Sex or the New Numb Normative?” Australian Feminist Studies 26 (67): 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2011.546333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimmel, Michael. 2015. “A Recipe for Sexual Assault.” Last Modified August 24, http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/08/what-makes-a-campus-rape-prone/402065/. Accessed October 10, 2017.
  22. Lazar, Michelle M. 2011. “The Right to be Beautiful: Postfeminist Identity and Consumer Beauty Advertising.” In New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity, edited by Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff, 37–51. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonard, Suzanne. 2007. “‘I Hate My Job, I Hate Everybody Here’: Adultery, Boredom, and the ‘Working Girl’ in Twenty-First Century American Cinema.” In Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, edited by Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra, 100–131. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leven, Jeremy. 2004. The Notebook. United States: New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  25. Loeb, Allan, and Timothy Dowling. 2011. Just Go With It. United States: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
  26. Lury, Celia. 1998. Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Memory and Identity. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mannuevo, Mona. 2016. “Caught in a Bad Romance? Affective Attachments in Contemporary Academia.” In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Living and Working in Contingency, 71–88. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. McRobbie, Angela. 2015. “Notes on the Perfect.” Australian Feminist Studies 30 (83): 3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1011485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Brien, Mike. 2011. “7 Minutes in Heaven.” YouTube, Last Modified July 28. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHaiXtr2Gpw. Accessed March 13, 2017.
  32. Ronen, Shelly. 2010. “Grinding On the Dance Floor: Gendered Scripts and Sexualized Dancing at College Parties.” Gender & Society 24 (3): 355–377.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210369894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scovell, Nell. 1996. Sabrina, the Teenage Witch. United States: Paramount Domestic Television Distribution.Google Scholar
  34. Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Skeggs, Beverley. 2005. “The Making of Class and Gender Through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation.” Sociology 39 (5): 965–982.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skeggs, Beverley. 2009. “The Moral Economy of Person Production: The Class Relations of Self-Performance on ‘Reality’ Television.” The Sociological Review 57 (4): 626–644.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2009.01865.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2013. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Skeggs, Beverley, and Simon Yuill. 2016. “Capital Experimentation with Person/a Formation: How Facebook’s Monetization Refigures the Relationship between Property, Personhood and Protest.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (3): 380–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1111403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Star, Darren. 1998. Sex and the City. United States: HBO Enterprises.Google Scholar
  41. Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tyler, Imogen. 2008. “Chav Mum Chav Scum”. Feminist Media Studies 8 (1):17–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770701824779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Universities UK. 2016. Changing the Culture: Report of the Universities UK Taskforce Examining Violence Against Women, Harassment and Hate Crime Affecting University Students. London: Universities UK.Google Scholar
  44. ‘The Voice.’ 2011. United States: Warner Bros Television Distribution.Google Scholar
  45. Weiner, Matthew. 2007. Mad Men. Los Angeles: Lionsgate.Google Scholar
  46. White, Mike. 2003. School of Rock. Edited by Richard Linklater. United States: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  47. Winch, Alison. 2013. Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akane Kanai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Media, Film and JournalismMonash UniversityCaulfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations