Advertisement

Do You Relate to This? Femininity, Affective Intimate Cultures and Neoliberalism

  • Akane Kanai
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the importance of relatability, and its status as a normative affective relation in girlfriend cultures. Relatability, I suggest, is linked to women’s intimate cultures and the feeling of belonging within what Lauren Berlant (The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Duke University Press, Durham, 2008) has termed ‘intimate publics’. In this book, I analyse a digital intimate public based on Tumblr, which I term the ‘WSWCM public’, in which feelings of commonality are circulated through ‘reaction GIF’ texts. I situate this public within a history of Western women’s cultures offering pleasures of affective sameness, and neoliberal cultures. This chapter introduces the key concerns of this book: the pleasures and politics of feeling ‘the same’ as other women; and the simultaneous intimate and disciplinary affective register through which a ‘relatable’ self may be mediated. I also provide an account of affective-discursive analysis as a method through which affective femininities may be analysed.

Keywords

Intimate public Relatability Neoliberalism Postfeminism Affect Digital methods 

References

  1. Abidin, Crystal, and Eric C. Thompson. 2012. “Buymylife.com: Cyber-femininities and Commercial Intimacy in Blogshops.” Women’s Studies International Forum 35 (6): 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, Lisa. 2003. “Reflexivity: Freedom or Habit of Gender?” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (6): 21–42.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adkins, Lisa. 2016. “Contingent Labour and the Rewriting of the Sexual Contract.” In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency, edited by Lisa Adkins and Maryanne Dever, 1–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ask, Kristine, and Crystal Abidin. 2018. “My Life is a Mess: Self-Deprecating Relatability and Collective Identities in the Memification of Student Issues.” Information, Communication & Society: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1437204.
  6. Attwood, Feona. 2011. “Through the Looking Glass? Sexual Agency and Subjectification Online.” In New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity, edited by Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff, 203–214. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2007. “What’s Your Flava? Race and Postfeminism in Media Culture.” In Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, edited by Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra, 201–226. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2011. “Branding the Post-feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube.” In Mediated Girlhoods: New Explorations of Girls’ Media Culture, edited by Mary Celeste Kearney, 277–294. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2012. Authentic TM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. The Individualized Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bauman, Ulrich. 2003. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, Ulrick. 1992. The Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Beech, Jennifer. 2017. “Facebook and Absent-Present Rhetorics of Whiteness.” In Rhetorics of Whiteness: Postracial Hauntings in Popular Culture, Social Media, and Education, edited by Tammie M. Kennedy, Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe, 132–144. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Berryman, Rachel, and Misha Kavka. 2017. “‘I Guess A Lot of People See Me as a Big Sister or a Friend’: The Role of Intimacy in the Celebrification of Beauty Vloggers.” Journal of Gender Studies 26 (3): 307–320.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1288611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blackman, Lisa. 2007. “Psychiatric Culture and Bodies of Resistance.” Body & Society 13 (2): 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x07077770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burgess, Jean. 2007. “Vernacular Creativity and New Media.” Doctor of Philosophy, Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  19. Cabalquinto, Earvin Charles B. 2017. “‘We’re Not Only Here But We’re There in Spirit’: Asymmetrical Mobile Intimacy and the Transnational Filipino Family.” Mobile Media & Communication 6 (1): 37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917722055.
  20. Casserly, Meghan. 2012. “#WhatShouldWeCallMe Revealed: The 24-Year Old Law Students Behind the New Tumblr Darling.” Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/03/29/whatshouldwecallme-revealed-24-year-old-law-students-tumblr-darling/. Accessed March 25, 2017.
  21. Cho, Alexander. 2011. “Queer Tumblrs, Networked Counterpublics.” Conference Papers—International Communication Association, 1–37.Google Scholar
  22. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2016. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cvetkovich, Ann. 1992. Mixed Feelings: Feminism, Mass Culture and Victorian Sensationalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dobson, Amy Shields. 2014. “Laddishness Online.” Cultural Studies 28 (1): 142–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2013.778893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobson, Amy Shields. 2015. Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobson, Amy Shields, and Anita Harris. 2015. “Post-girlpower: Globalized Mediated Femininities.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 29 (2): 143–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1022943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dosekun, Simidele. 2015. “For Western Girls Only?” Feminist Media Studies 15 (6): 960–975.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1062991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duffy, B. E., and E. Hund. 2015. “‘Having It All’ on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers.” Social Media + Society 1 (2).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337.
  29. Eckerle, Courtney. 2012. “Law Students’ Fun Way to Keep in Touch Becomes Tumblr Sensation.” USA Today. http://college.usatoday.com/2012/04/18/law-students-fun-way-to-keep-in-touch-becomes-tumblr-sensation/. Accessed November 15, 2017.
  30. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gill, Rosalind, and Akane Kanai. 2018. “Mediating Neoliberal Capitalism: Affect, Subjectivity and Inequality.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 318–326.  https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2015. “The Confidence Cult(ure).” Australian Feminist Studies 30 (86): 324–344.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2016.1148001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gonick, Marnina. 2006. “Between ‘Girl Power’ and ‘Reviving Ophelia’: Constituting the Neoliberal Girl Subject.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal 18 (2): 1–22.Google Scholar
  35. Gonick, Marnina, Emma Renold, Jessica Ringrose, and Lisa Weems. 2009. “Rethinking Agency and Resistance: What Comes After Girl Power?” Girlhood Studies 2 (2): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.newcastle.edu.au/10.3167/ghs.2009.020202.
  36. Gunew, Sneja. 2009. “Subaltern Empathy: Beyond European Categories in Affect Theory.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 35 (1): 11–30.Google Scholar
  37. Gwynne, Joel. 2013. “Japan, Postfeminism and the Consumption of Sexual(ised) Schoolgirls in Male-Authored Contemporary Manga.” Feminist Theory 14 (3): 325–343.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, Stuart. 1988. The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  39. Hamad, Hannah. 2014. “Fairy Jobmother to the Rescue?: Postfeminism and the Recessionary Cultures of Reality TV.” In Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity, edited by Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker, 223–245. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harris, Anita. 2004. Future Girl: Young Women in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hearn, Alison. 2006. “‘John, A 20-Year-Old Boston Native with a Great Sense of Humor’: On the Spectacularization of the ‘Self’ and the Incorporation of Identity in the Age of Reality Television.” In The Celebrity Culture Reader, edited by P. David Marshall, 618–633. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Hemmings, Clare. 2005. “Invoking Affect: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn.” Cultural Studies 19 (5): 548–567.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hochschild, Arlie. 1983/2003. The Managed Heart: The Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jarrett, Kylie. 2015. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Kanai, Akane. 2015. “Thinking Beyond the Internet as a Tool: Girls’ Online Spaces as Postfeminist Structures of Surveillance.” In eGirls, eCitizens, edited by Jane Bailey and Valerie Steeves, 83–106. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  47. Karatzogianni, Athina, and Adi Kuntsman (eds.). 2012. Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Affect and Technological Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Kennedy, Tammie M., Joyce Irene Middleton, and Krista Ratcliffe. 2005. “The Matter of Whiteness: Or, Why Whiteness Studies Is Important to Rhetoric and Composition Studies.” Rhetoric Review 24 (4): 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leys, Ruth. 2011. “The Turn to Affect.” Critical Inquiry 37 (3): 434–472.  https://doi.org/10.1086/659353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lim, Sun Sun. 2015. “On Stickers and Communicative Fluidity in Social Media.” Social Media + Society 1 (1).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578137.
  51. Loh, Bernice. 2016. “Beyond the Discourse of Sexualization: An Inquiry into the Adultification of Tween Girls’ Dressing in Singapore.” Girlhood Studies 9 (2): 126–143.  https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2016.090214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luckman, Susan. 2015. “Women’s Micro-Entrepreneurial Homeworking.” Australian Feminist Studies 30 (84): 146–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1038117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mannuevo, Mona. 2016. “Caught in a Bad Romance? Affective Attachments in Contemporary Academia.” In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Living and Working in Contingency, 71–88. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, P. David. 2010. “The Promotion and Presentation of the Self: Celebrity as Marker of Presentational Media.” Celebrity Studies 1 (1): 35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392390903519057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marwick, Alice E. 2015. “Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy.” Public Culture 27 (1 75): 137–160.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379.
  56. McRobbie, Angela. 2007. “Top Girls?: Young Women and the Post-feminist Sexual Contract.” Cultural Studies 21 (4–5): 718–737.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380701279044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. McRobbie, Angela. 2011. “Beyond Post-feminism.” Public Policy Research 18 (3): 179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-540x.2011.00661.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McRobbie, Angela. 2015. “Notes on the Perfect.” Australian Feminist Studies 30 (83): 3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1011485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meese, James. 2014. “‘It Belongs to the Internet’: Animal Images, Attribution Norms and the Politics of Amateur Media Production.” M/C Journal 14 (2). Accessed November 2, 2014.Google Scholar
  61. Milner, Ryan. 2013. “Pop Polyvocality: Internet Memes, Public Participation, and the Occupy Wall Street Movement.” International Journal of Communication 7: 2357–2390.Google Scholar
  62. Miltner, Kate. 2014. “There’s No Place for Lulz on LOLCats: The Role of Genre, Gender, and Group Identity in the Interpretation and Enjoyment of an Internet Meme.” First Monday 19 (8).  https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i8.5391. Accessed December 1, 2014.
  63. Mugumogu. 2010. “Many Too Small Boxes and Maru.” YouTube, Last Modified 10 November, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XID_W4neJo. Accessed September 4, 2015.
  64. Nakamura, Lisa. 2008. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nakamura, Lisa. 2014. “‘I WILL DO EVERYthing That Am Asked’: Scambaiting, Digital Show-Space, and the Racial Violence of Social Media.” Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 257–274.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914546845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Negra, Diane. 2008. What a Girl Wants? Fantasising the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Negra, Diane, and Yvonne Tasker. 2014. “Introduction. Gender and Recessionary Culture.” In Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity, edited by Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker, 1–30. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Nunn, Heather, and Anita Biressi. 2010. “‘A Trust Betrayed’: Celebrity and the Work of Emotion.” Celebrity Studies 1 (1): 49–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392390903519065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Neill, Catherine Quinn. 2012. “What Should We Call Me… When I’m Beauty Obsessed.” Allure. Last Modified April 5, http://www.allure.com/beauty-trends/blogs/daily-beauty-reporter/2012/04/what-should-we-call-me-when-im-beauty-obsessed.html. Accessed April 4, 2015.
  70. Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ouellette, Laurie, and James Hay. 2008. “Makeover Television, Governmentality and the Good Citizen.” Continuum 22 (4): 471–484.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310801982930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pedwell, Carolyn. 2014. Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Petersen, Michael Nebeling, Katherine Harrison, Tobias Raun, and Rikke Andreassen. 2018. “Introduction: Mediated Intimacies.” In Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities, edited by Rikke Andreassen, Michael Nebeling Petersen, Katherine Harrison, and Tobias Raun, 1–16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Plummer, K. 2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle, WA and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rault, Jasmine. 2017. “White Noise, White Affects: Filtering the Sameness of Queer Suffering.” Feminist Media Studies 17 (4): 585–599.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1326557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem. London: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Senft, Theresa M. 2008. Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  78. Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Silva, Jennifer M. 2013. Coming Up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Sullivan, Shannon. 2015. The Physiology of Racist and Sexist Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tanner, Claire, JaneMaree Maher, and Suzanne Fraser. 2013. Vanity: 21st Century Selves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tansel, Cemal Burak. 2017. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Towards a New Research Agenda.” In States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order, edited by Cemal Burak Tansel, 1–28. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  84. Tasker, Yvonne, and Diane Negra. 2007. “Introduction: Feminist Politics and Postfeminist Culture.” In Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, edited by Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra, 1–25. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taylor, Jessica. 2016. “Laptops and Playpens: ‘Mommy Bloggers’ and Visions of Household Work.” In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Living and Working in Contingency, edited by Lisa Adkins and Maryanne Dever, 109–128. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Thumim, Nancy. 2012. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner, Graeme. 2004. Understanding Celebrity. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turner, Graeme. 2010. “Approaching Celebrity Studies.” Celebrity Studies 1 (1): 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392390903519024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van der Nagel, Emily. 2013. “Faceless Bodies: Negotiating Technological and Cultural Codes on Reddit Gonewild.” Scan: Journal of Media Arts Culture 10 (2). Accessed March 29, 2015.Google Scholar
  90. Vásquez, Camilla, and Samantha Creel. 2017. “Conviviality Through Creativity: Appealing to the Reblog in Tumblr Chat Posts.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson, Julie, and Emily Chivers Yochim. 2017. Mothering Through Precarity: Women’s Work and Digital Media. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Winch, Alison. 2013. Girlfriends and Postfeminist Sisterhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akane Kanai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Media, Film and JournalismMonash UniversityCaulfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations