Advertisement

The Intersection Between Capacity Building and Finance

  • Federico Munari
  • Laura Toschi
Chapter
Part of the SxI - Springer for Innovation / SxI - Springer per l'Innovazione book series (SXIINNO, volume 14)

Abstract

New ventures do not have access to the same financial resources as larger firms, for the presence of the so-called “funding gap”. Such a barrier can be particularly pronounced for university startups, given their knowledge- and technology-based nature. To address this market failure, universities (often in collaboration with public and/or private partners) have started to activate programs to support their startups. By presenting a set of best practices and case studies, the chapter describes three main areas of intervention in the area of capacity building for accessing finance: (i) raising awareness and competences to access external finance (i.e. training activities and commercialization bootcamps), (ii) supporting the validation and maturation of university technologies (i.e. proof-of-concept programmes and university accelerator programmes) and (iii) enhancing interactions and building partnership with investors (i.e. matchmaking events with investors, networks of different types of investors, formalized partnerships between universities and financial investors, and university seed funds).

References

  1. Australian Venture Capital Association Limited. http://www.avcal.com.au/
  2. Bank of England (2000) Finance for small firms: a seventh report. Bank of England, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger AN, Udell GF (1998) The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. J Bank Finance 22(6–8):613–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolzani D, Munari F, Rasmussen E, Toschi L (2017) Technology Transfer Offices as providers of science and technology entrepreneurship education. Paper presented at the international research conference on science and technology entrepreneurship education, Toulose, France, 27–28 April 2017Google Scholar
  5. Croce A, Grilli L, Murtinu S (2014) Venture capital enters academia: an analysis of university-managed funds. J Technol Transfer 39(5):688–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darcy J, Kraemer-Eis K, Guellec D, Debande O (2009) Financing technology transfer. European Investment Fund, Adenauer, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  7. Giuri P, Munari F, Pasquini M (2013) What determines university patent commercialization? Empirical evidence on the role of IPR ownership. Ind Innov 20(5):488–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lerner J (2005) The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades. J Technol Transfer 30(1–2):49–56Google Scholar
  9. Lerner J (2009) Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manigart S, De Waele K, Wright M et al (2000) Venture capitalists, investment appraisal and accounting information: a comparative study of the USA, UK, France, Belgium and Holland. Eur Financ Manag 6(3):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Manigart S, De Waele K, Wright M et al (2002) Determinants of required return in venture capital investments: a five-country study. J Bus Ventur 17(4):291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mason C, Harrison R (2001) ‘Investment readiness’: a critique of government proposals to increase the demand for venture capital. Reg Stud 35(7):663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Munari F, Toschi L (2011) Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spin-offs? Evidence from the micro- and nanotechnology sector in the UK. Ind Corp Change 20(2):397–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Munari F, Pasquini M, Toschi L (2015) From the lab to the stock market? The characteristics and impact of university-oriented seed funds in Europe. J Technol Transfer 40(6):948–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Munari F, Rasmussen E, Toschi L et al (2016) Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: a cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. J Technol Transfer 41(6):1377–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Munari F, Sobrero M, Toschi L (2017a) Financing technology transfer: assessment of university-oriented proof-of-concept programmes. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 29(2):233–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munari F, Sobrero M, Toschi L (2017b) The university as a venture capitalist? Gap funding instruments for technology transfer. Technol Forecast Soc Change 127:70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schibler E, McAdam R (1998) Study of the financial intermediary market in Atlantic Canada: KPMG consulting for Atlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyGoogle Scholar
  19. Wright M, Hoskisson R, Busenitz L et al (2001) Finance and management buyouts: agency versus entrepreneurship perspectives. Venture Capital 3(3):239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wright M, Lockett A, Clarysse B et al (2006) University spin-out companies and venture capital. Res Policy 35(4):481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations