Advertisement

PROGRESS-TT: Methodology, Content, Procedures, Actions

  • Andrea Basso
  • Célia Gavaud
  • Alan Kennedy
Chapter
Part of the SxI - Springer for Innovation / SxI - Springer per l'Innovazione book series (SXIINNO, volume 14)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the specifics of the PROGRESS-TT project and in particular the strategy, methodology and the procedures that have been developed for its implementation and how they came to be instrumental to a program to improve the capacity of technology transfer organization.

References

  1. Adams J (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J Polit Econ 98:673–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen T (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Branscomb LM, Kodama F, Florida R (1999) Industrializing knowledge. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manage Sci 48(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conti A, Gaule P (2008) The CEMI survey of university technology transfer offices in Europe, Report CEMI report, CEMI_TTO2008Google Scholar
  6. Debackere K, Veugelers R (2005) The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res Policy 34:321–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (2014) Research and innovation as sources of renewed growth. Report, European Commission, SWD(2014)181, Brussels 2014 SWD(2014)181Google Scholar
  8. Frederick P, Granieri M (2015) Development of a holistic tool to identify barriers to success for technology transfer offices. Social Science Research Network, SSRN, April 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2596508
  9. Friedman J, Silberman J (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? J Technol Transf 28(1):17–30Google Scholar
  10. Giuri P, Munari F, Toschi L (2016) The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities SPRU 50th anniversary conference. Brigton, UK, 6–9 Sept 2016Google Scholar
  11. Griliches Z (1998) R&D and productivity. Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson R, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80(1):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79(5):957–970Google Scholar
  14. Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. Rev Econ Stat 55–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazurkiewicz A, Poteralska B (2017) Technology transfer barriers and challenges faced by R&D organisations. In: Procedia engineering, vol 182, pp 457–465. ISSN:1877-7058, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.134, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817312705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Munari F, Rasmussen E, Toschi L, Villani E (2016) Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: a cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. J Technol Transf 41(6):1377–1405. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:41:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-015-9448-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and science. Res Policy 26:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Kane C, Mangematin V, Geoghegan W, Fitzgerald C (2014) University technology transfer offices: the search for identity to build legitimacy. Res Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003OKane2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenberg N, Nelson R (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res Policy 23:323–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smilor R (2004) University venturing: technology transfer and commercialization in higher education. Int J Technol Transf Commercial 3(1):111Google Scholar
  21. Tom JMM, Oshri I, Volberda HW (2012) The skills base of technology transfer professionals. pp 871–891 | Published online: 08 Oct 2012Google Scholar
  22. Tushman M (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Adm Sci Q 22:587–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tushman M, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: an investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Manage Sci 26(11):1071–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Volberda HK, Oshri I, Mom JM (2012) Technology transfer: the practice and the profession. pp 863–869 | Published online: 08 Oct 2012Google Scholar
  25. Veugelers R, Del Rey (2014) The contribution of universities to innovation, (regional) growth and employment. European Networks on Economics of Education University of Girona (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MITO TechnologyMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations