Advertisement

Drama As a Learning Medium in Science Education

  • Ran Peleg
  • Anna-Lena Østern
  • Alex Strømme
  • Ayelet Baram Tsabari
Chapter
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 5)

Abstract

To respond to the decline of young people’s interest in the sciences, calls have been made to reorganize the ways in which science is taught, in order to address low student motivation. Drama offers a toolbox of techniques that can be used when teaching science and which can address the issue of low student motivation. This chapter provides science teacher educators with the theoretical and practical knowledge of how drama may serve as an inquiry-based teaching and learning tool in the sciences and how it may increase students’ scientific literacy, engagement and motivation. We discuss aspects of teacher training for the use of drama in the science classroom with two sample workshops aimed at teachers’ professional development. Hereafter we describe some conventions offered by the genre process drama. We discuss the learning achieved through drama. We then show that drama can be an inquiry-based learning form which functions through narrative and is multimodal, multisensory and sociocultural. We address the potential of a budding researcher and give some aspects of a future scenario for inquiry-based learning focusing on depth of learning through embodiment.

Keywords

Drama Science education Scientific literacy Inquiry-based learning Embodied learning 

References

  1. Abrahams, I., & Braund, M. I. (2012). Performing science: Teaching chemistry. In Physics and biology through drama. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Alrutz, M. (2004). Granting science a dramatic license: Exploring a 4th grade science classroom and the possibilities for integrating drama. Teaching Artist Journal, 2(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashkenazi, G. (2006). Metaphors in science and art: Enhancing human awareness and perception. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  4. Black, P. (2017). Assessment in science education. In K. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education an international course companion (pp. 295–309). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. DICE Consortium. (2010). Making a world of difference. A DICE resource for practitioners on educational theatre and drama. Belgrade, Serbia: DICE Consortium.Google Scholar
  7. Dorion, K. R. (2009). Science through Drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2247–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. LK06. (2006). Natural science subject curriculum. Oslo, Norway: Utdanningsdirektoratet. Retrieved September, 2011, from http://www.utdanningsdirektoratet.no/upload/larerplaner/Fastsatte_lareplaner_for_Kunnskapsloeftet/english/Natural_science_subject_curriculum.rtf
  12. McGregor, D. (2012). Dramatising science learning: Findings from a pilot study to re-invigorate elementary science pedagogy for five-to seven-year olds. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1145–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82(298), 73–82.Google Scholar
  14. Neelands, J. (2000). In T. Goode (Ed.), Structuring drama work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1990).Google Scholar
  15. NOU 2015-8. (2015). Fremtidens skole – fornyelse av fag og kompetanser [The school of the future – Renewal of subjects and competences]. https://www.regeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2015-8/id2417001/sec1
  16. O’Toole, J., & Dunn, J. (2002). Pretending to learn: Helping children learn through drama. Port Melbourne, Australia: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  17. O’Toole, J., & Dunn, J. (2013). Pretending to learn- teaching drama in the primary and middle years. First published in 2002. French Forest: Pearson Education Australia. The third revised edition is a Kindle digital edition.Google Scholar
  18. Ødegaard, M., Haug, B. S., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2016). På forskerføtter i naturfag [On researcher feet in science education]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  19. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Østern, A. L. (2013). Close-up of the craft of making a multimodal lecture for teenagers about the universe: The importance of a meaningful context and supporting colleagues. Reflective Practice, 14(6), 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Østern, A.-L. (2014). Dramaturgi i didaktisk kontekst. [Dramaturgy in educational context] Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  23. Østern, A. L., & Kristoffersen, A. M. (2015). Combining art and science in exploration of humanity and the universe: Teenagers’ storied experience of the universe played back in improvisational theatre in a learning context. Applied Theatre Research, 3(3), 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Østern, A.-L., & Peleg, R. (2014). Kroppslig læring om gravitasjon. Dans, mime og naturfagpå ungdomsskolen [Bodily learning about gravity – Dance, mime and science in junior high school]. In T. P. Østern, & A. Strømme (Eds.), Sanselig didaktisk design SPACE ME [Aesthetic pedagogical design SPACE ME] (pp. 129–152). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  25. Østern, T. P., & Østern, A.-L. (2016). Storyline as a key to meaningful learning arts and science combined in SPACE ME. In P. Mitchell & J. M. McNaughton (Eds.), Storyline: A creative approach to meaningful learning and teaching (pp. 116–135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Østern, T. P., & Strømme, A. (Eds.). (2014). Sanselig didaktisk design SPACE ME [Aesthetic educational design]. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  27. Peleg, R., Katchevich, D., Yayon, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Dittmar, J., & Eilks, I. (2015). The magic sand mystery. Science in School, 32, 37–40.Google Scholar
  28. Peleg, R., Yayon, M., Katchevich, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Fortus, D., Eilks, I., et al. (2017). Teachers’ views on implementing storytelling as a way to motivate inquiry learning in high-school chemistry teaching. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 18, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter Vygotskij [The didactics post Vygotskij]. Stockholm, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  31. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Svendsen, B. (2017). Inquiries into teacher professional development. A longitudinal school-based intervention study of teacher professional development (TPD) conducted in the frame of a cultural historical activity theory perspective (CHAT). Dissertation, Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  33. Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Warner, C. D., & Andersen, C. (2004). “Snails are Science”: Creating context for science inquiry and writing through process drama. Youth Theatre Journal, 18(1), 68–86Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 74–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ran Peleg
    • 1
  • Anna-Lena Østern
    • 2
  • Alex Strømme
    • 2
  • Ayelet Baram Tsabari
    • 3
  1. 1.EdQuest – Creative Science EducationRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Department of teacher educationNTNUTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Faculty of Education in Science and TechnologyTechnion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations