Advertisement

Physical Principles of Magnetic Resonance and Magnetic Resonance Angiography

  • Fridon Todua
  • Dudana Gachechiladze
Chapter

Abstract

In 1950–1960 nuclear magnetic resonance was the most acceptable method of study of configuration of chemical structure of substances and reactive processes. In 1973 Lauterbach performed the first magnetic resonance study. Since 1983, the development of magnetic resonance equipment and its software later gave a possibility to the investigators to receive a high contrast image of 1 mm slice within several seconds.

References

  1. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R et al (2005) Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 236:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belichenko OI (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.Belichenko OI, Dadvapi SA, Abramova NN, Ternovoi SK. Vidar. 111 p.Google Scholar
  3. Bradlay WG (1988) Flow phenomena in MR imaging. AJR 150:983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Debrey SM, Baird AE, Yu H, Lynch JK et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 39:2237–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartung MP, Grist TM, Francois CJ (2011) Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heisermann JE, Drager B, Fram E et al (1992) Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of 1-flight MR angiography. Radiology 182:761–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Link J, Steffens J, Graessner J, Heller M (1999) MR angiography of the carotid arteries from the aortic arch to the circle of Willis. Radiology 211(p):460Google Scholar
  8. Lohan DG, Barkhordarian F, Saleh R, Krishnam M (2007) MR angiography at 3 T for assessment of the external carotid artery system. Am J Roentgenol 189:1088–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Magarelli N, Saarabino T, Simeoni A et al (2000) Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR angiography and CT angiography. Radiology 218(p):135Google Scholar
  10. Neumann-Haefelin T, Moseley M et al (2000) New magnetic resonance imaging methods for cerebrovascular disease: emerging clinical applications. Ann Neurol 31:559–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Chiras J, Dormont D, Marsault C (2003) Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 229:697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Runck F, Steiner P, Bautz WA, Lell MM (2008) MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 29(9):1736–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sinitsin V (1995) MRT in of heart and vessel diseases. Assay Doctor Science Degree Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fridon Todua
    • 1
  • Dudana Gachechiladze
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyNational Academy of Sciences of Georgia, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, I. Javakhishili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyProgramme of Caucasus UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Department of Ultrasound DiagnosticsNational Medical Academy of Georgia, Research Institute of Clinical MedicineTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations