Advertisement

Methodological Design and Empirical Findings

  • João Leitão
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

This empirical application aims to assess the influence of internal and liaison factors, characterized by different resources and transactional elements on business innovation capacity, contrasting industrial firms and service firms, in the context of open innovation with strategic coopetition.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  2. Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  3. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52, 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cockburn, I., & Henderson, R. (1998). Absorptive capacity, co-authoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coombs, R., Richards, A., Saviotti, P., & Walsh, V. (1996). Technological collaboration: The dynamics of cooperation in industrial innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Delaney, J., & Huselid, M. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–964.Google Scholar
  11. Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finney, D. (1947). Probit analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 36, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 463–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house basic research. Research Policy, 21(5), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garraffo, F. (2002). Types of coopetition to manage emerging technologies. In 2nd Annual Conference, Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  18. Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heras, M. (2014). Building product diversification through contractual R&D agreements. R&D Management, 44(4), 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, B., Lorentz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2002). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koch, M., & McGrath, R. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12, 1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From use-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Siverbert, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  27. Mangematin, V., & Nesta, L. (1999). What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb? International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalised Linear Models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, D., Fern, M., & Cardinal, L. (2007). The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 502, 308–326.Google Scholar
  31. Narula, R. (2004). Understanding absorptive capacities in an “innovation systems” context: Consequences for economic growth. MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum series 2004–003.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nerkar, A., & Roberts, P. (2004). Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng, C., & So, T. (2002). Logistic regression analysis and reporting: A primer. Understanding Statistics, 1(1), 31–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pereira, D., & Leitão, J. (2016). Absorptive capacity, coopetition and product innovation: Contrasting Italian and Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 10–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothaermel, F., & Alexandre, M. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science Archive, 20(4), 759–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991). External linkages and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. R&D Management, 21, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rusko, R. (2011). Exploring the concept of coopetition: A typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sako, M. (1994). Supplier relationships and innovation. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation. England: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar
  41. Shaw, B. (1994). User/Supplier links and innovation. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation. England: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar
  42. Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., & de Boer, M. (1999). Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10, 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. (2011). Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolio. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Garcia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2008). Analyzing the determinants of firm’s absorptive capacity. R&D Management, 38(4), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vinding, A. (2000). Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Denmark: Department of Business Studies, DRUID/IKE Group. Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  47. Vinding, A. (2004). Human resources: Absorptive capacity and innovative performance. In J. Christensen & B.-Å. Lundvall (Eds.), Product innovation, interactive learning and economic performance. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  48. Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang, D., Agterberg, F., Cheng, Q., & Zuo, R. (2014). Response to comment by Helmut Schaeben on “A Comparison of Modified Fuzzy Weights of Evidence, Fuzzy Weights of Evidence, and Logistic Regression for Mapping Mineral Prospectivity”. Mathematical Geosciences, © International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9496-8.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Leitão
    • 1
  1. 1.NECE, Research Center in Business SciencesUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations