Advertisement

On Asymmetric Problems of Objects’ Comparison

  • Maciej KrawczakEmail author
  • Grażyna Szkatuła
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10842)

Abstract

In the paper, we describe selected problems which appear during the process of comparison of the objects. The direction of objects’ comparison seems to have essential role because such comparison may not be symmetric. Thus, we can say that two objects may be viewed as an attempt to determine the degree to which they are similar or different. Asymmetric phenomena of comparing such objects is emphasized and discussed.

Keywords

Proximity of objects Directional comparison Asymmetric proximities Measures of proximity 

References

  1. 1.
    Beals, R., Krantz, D.H., Tversky, A.: The foundations of multidimensional scaling. Psychol. Rev. 75, 127–142 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, P.L.: Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. Wiley, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi, S., Cha, S., Tappert, C.C.: A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Syst. Cybern. Inform. 8(1), 43–48 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cross, V.V., Sudkamp, T.A.: Similarity and Compatibility in Fuzzy Set Theory. Physica, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1793-5CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garner, W.R., Haun, F.: Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 4(2), 199–209 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman, N. (ed.) Problems and Projects, pp. 437–450. Bobs-Merril, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodgetts, C.J., Hahn, U., Chater, N.: Transformation and alignment in similarity. Cognition 113, 62–79 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hodgetts, C.J., Hahn, U.: Similarity-based asymmetries in perceptual matching. Acta Psychol. 139(2), 291–299 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: On asymmetric matching between sets. Inf. Sci. 312, 89–103 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Multiset approach to compare qualitative data. In: Proceedings 6th World Conference on Soft Computing, Berkeley, pp. 264–269 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kacprzyk, J., Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: On bilateral matching between fuzzy set. Inf. Sci. 402, 244–266 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Geometrical interpretation of impact of one set on another set. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10245, pp. 253–262. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59063-9_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Bidirectional comparison of multi-attribute qualitative objects. Inf. Sci. 436–437, 367–387 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10, 707–710 (1966)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tanca, M., Grossberg, S., Pinna, B.: Probing perceptual antinomies with the watercolor illusion and explaining how the brain resolves them (PDF). Seeing Perceiving 23, 295–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84(4), 327–352 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tversky, A.: Preference, Belief, and Similarity. Selected Writings by Amos Tversky. Edited by Eldar Shafir. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tversky, A., Gati, I.: Studies of similarity. In: Rosch, E., Lloyd, B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization, vol. 1, pp. 79–98. Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Systems Research InstitutePolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations