Genetic Programming for the Classification of Levels of Mammographic Density
Breast cancer is the second cause of death of adult women in Mexico. Some of the risk factors for breast cancer that are visible in a mammography are the masses, calcifications, and the levels of mammographic density. While the first two have been studied extensively through the use of digital mammographies, this is not the case for the last one. In this paper, we address the automatic classification problem for the levels of mammographic density based on an evolutionary approach. Our solution comprises the following stages: thresholding, feature extractions, and the implementation of a genetic program. We performed experiments to compare the accuracy of our solution with other conventional classifiers. Experimental results show that our solution is very competitive and even outperforms the other classifiers in some cases.
KeywordsBreast cancer Levels of mammographic density Genetic programming
This work was supported by PRODEP under grant 511-6/17-8931 (ITCGUZ-CA-7), and by the TecNM under the projects 6055.17-P and 6307.17-P. Additionally, it was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under grant TIN2015-66972-C5-4-R co-financed by FEDER funds.
- 2.Lozano, R., Knaul, F., Gómez-Dantés, H., Arreola-Ornelas, H., Méndez, O.: Trends in mortality of breast cancer in Mexico, 1979–2006, observatory of health. Work Document. Competitiveness and Health, Mexican Foundation for the Health (2008). (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- 3.Franco-Marina, F., Lazcano-Ponce, E., López-Carrillo, L.: Breast cancer mortality in Mexico: an age-period-cohort analysis. Pub. Health Mex. 51, s157–s164 (2009). (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- 5.Brandan, M.E., Villaseñor, Y.: Detection of breast cancer: state of the mammography in Mexico. Cancerology 1(3), 14–162 (2006). (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- 9.Burling-Claridge, F., Iqbal, M., Zhang, M.: Evolutionary algorithms for classification of mammographie densities using local binary patterns and statistical features. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 3847–3854 (2016)Google Scholar
- 11.Chan, T.F., Golub, G.H., LeVeque, R.J.: Updating formulae and a pairwise algorithm for computing sample variances. In: Caussinus, H., Ettinger, P., Tomassone, R. (eds.) COMPSTAT 1982 5th Symposium held at Toulouse 1982, pp. 30–41. Springer, Heidelberg (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51461-6_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Polakowski, W.E., Cournoyer, D.A., Rogers, S.K., DeSimio, M.P., Ruck, D.W., Hoffmeister, J.W., Raines, R.A.: Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(6), 811–819 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Image processing. Digital Image Process. 2 (2007)Google Scholar
- 23.Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S., et al.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Medica. Int. Congr. Ser. 1069, 375–378 (1994)Google Scholar