Advertisement

Particle Size and Distribution

  • Anthony J. Hickey
  • Stefano Giovagnoli
Chapter
Part of the AAPS Introductions in the Pharmaceutical Sciences book series (AAPSINSTR)

Abstract

Particle size distribution, the measure of subdivision of a solid, can be directly correlated with uniformity of quality and performance. Primary particle size is a physicochemical property that may impact temporal chemical and physical effects such as stability and aggregation. In addition, particle size influences the motion of the powder or suspension that may be required during processing or as an endpoint of the dosage form performance.

Descriptions of particle size are based on assumptions about the dimension being measured. Moreover, since particles in a finely divided solid exist in a range of sizes, assumptions are made about their distribution and mathematical functions that best approximate the materials under scrutiny. It is important to acknowledge the assumptions and their limitations in accurately describing a particle size distribution. Comparing the definition adopted with the process or performance characteristic desired maximizes the likelihood of setting relevant product specifications.

References

  1. 1.
    Mullin J. Crystallization. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parrott E. Milling of pharmaceutical solids. J Pharm Sci. 1974;63:813–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sieving AT. Particle size measurement. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1990. p. 192.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen T. Particle size, shape and distribution. Particle size measurement. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1990. p. 124–91.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russ J. The image processing handbook. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adamson A, Gast A. Physical chemistry of surfaces. New York: Wiley; 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brunauer S, Emmett P, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc. 1938;60:309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beaubien L, Vanderwielen A. Particle-size analysis of pharmaceutical powders. J Pharm Sci. 1980;69:651–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sinko P. Martin’s physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters and Kluwer; 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schimpf M, Caldwell K, Giddings J. Field-flow fractionation. New York: Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lodge JP, Chan T. Cascade impactor sampling and data analysis. Akron: American Industrial Hygiene Association; 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tougas T, Mitchell J, Lyapustina S, editors. Good cascade impactor practices, AIM and EDA for orally inhaled products. New York: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    deBoer G, deWeerd C, Thoenes D, Goossens H. Laser diffraction spectrometry: Fraunhofer diffraction versus Mie scattering. Part Part Syst Charact. 1987;4:14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dodge L. Calibration of Malvern particle sizer. Appl Opt. 1984;14:2415–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaszuba M, McKnight D, Connah M, McNeil-Watson F, Nobbmann U. Measuring subnanometre sizes using dynamic light scattering. J Nanopart Res. 2008;10:823–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dunbar C, Hickey A. Evaluation of probability density functions to approximate particle size distributions. J Aerosol Sci. 2000;31:813–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stockham J. What is particle size: the relationship among statistical diameters. In: Stockham J, Fochtman E, editors. Particle size analysis. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Press; 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony J. Hickey
    • 1
  • Stefano Giovagnoli
    • 2
  1. 1.Discovery Science and TechnologyRTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations