Advertisement

‘In This Country, Beauty Is Defined by Fairness of Skin.’ Skin Colour Politics and Social Stratification in India

  • Nina Kullrich
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Globalization and Embodiment book series (PSGE)

Abstract

A pervasive preference for lighter complexions in India has become apparent, not least in the increasing consumption of skin-lightening products. Scholarship on colourism situates skin bleaching primarily within the context of (post-)colonial racism and global white supremacy. Building on these approaches, this chapter proposes to understand ‘white’ as a travelling and relational concept and, in the Indian context, to distinguish analytically between the concepts of ‘fair’ and ‘white’. Hence, the central aim of this chapter is to de-centralise, even de-colonialize ‘whiteness’ in beauty studies. By examining the shades of meaning of skin colour and different social functions of skin bleaching, it shows how skin colour is (re)produced as a political signifier and as the embodied materiality of social relations, primarily those of class and gender.

References

  1. Abraham, Janaki. 2006. “The Stain of White: Liaisons, Memories, and White Men as Relatives.” Men and Masculinities 9: 131–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x06287764.
  2. Abu-Er-Rub, Laila. 2017. “Goldene Zeiten: Mode und Körper im neoliberalen Indien” [“Golden Times: Fashion and Body in Neoliberal India”]. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, Arjun. 1993. “The Heart of Whiteness.” Callaloo 16 (4): 796.Google Scholar
  4. Bailkin, Jordanna. 2014. “Indian Yellow: Making and Breaking the Imperial Palette”. In Empires of Vision: A Reader, edited by Sumathi Ramaswamy and Martin Jay, 91–110. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2017. “‘I’m Beautiful the Way I Am’: Empowerment, Beauty, and Aesthetic Labour.” In Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism, edited by Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff, 265–82. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Barthes, Roland. 1986 [1964]. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  7. Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, Shilpi. 2012. “The Desire for Whiteness: Can Law and Economics explain it?” Colombia Journal of Race and Law 2 (1): 117–147.Google Scholar
  9. Blay, Yaba Amqborale. 2011. “Skin Bleaching and Global White Supremacy: By Way of Introduction.” The Journal of Pan African Studies 4 (4): 4–46.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1976 [1972]. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. Castro Varela, M., and N. Dhawan. 2005. “Of Mimicry and (Wo)Man: Desiring Whiteness in Postcolonialism.” In Mythen, Masken und Subjekte. Kritische Weißseinsforschung in Deutschland, edited by M. Eggers et al., 318–336. Münster: Unrast.Google Scholar
  12. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2002. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chakravarti, Uma. 2004. Gendering Caste Through a Feminist Lens. Calcutta: Stree.Google Scholar
  15. Chaudhuri, Nupur. 1994. “Memsahibs and Their Servants in Nineteenth-Century India.” Women’s History Review 3 (4): 549–62.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029400200071.
  16. Craig, Maxine Leeds. 2006. “Race, Beauty, and the Tangled Knot of a Guilty Pleasure.” Feminist Theory 7 (2): 159–77.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, Kathy. 1995. Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Degele, Nina. 2004. Sich schön machen. Zur Soziologie von Geschlecht und Schönheitshandeln. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dehejia, Harsha V., and Makarand Paranjape, eds. 2003. Saundarya: The Perception and Practice of Beauty in India. New Delhi: Samvad India Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Deshpande, Dipesh. 1993. “Imagined Economies: Styles of Nation-Building in Twentieth Century India.” Journal of Arts and Ideas 25–26: 5–35.Google Scholar
  21. Doniger, Wendy. 2009. The Hindus: An Alternative History. New Delhi: Penguin/Viking Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dube, Leela. 2008. “Caste and Women.” In Women’s Studies in India: A Reader, edited by Mary E. John, 466–74. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  23. du Gay, Paul. 1996. Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Elias, Ana Sofia, Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff, eds. 2017. Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Erevelles, Nirmala. 2011. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fanon, Franz. 1967 [1952]. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  27. Federici, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  28. Fischer-Tiné, Harald. 2009. ‘Low and Licentious Europeans’: Race, Class and White Subalternity in Colonial India. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, Michel. 1988 [1969]. Archäologie des Wissens. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  30. Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Garfinkel, Harold. 1976. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Gatzlaff-Hälsig, M., ed. 2002. Handwörterbuch Hindi-Deutsch. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
  33. Gilroy, Paul. 1995. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  34. Gimlin, Debra L. 2002. Body Work: Beauty and Self-Image in American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Glenn, Nakano Evelyn. 2009. “Consuming Lightness: Segmented Markets and Global Capital in the Skin-Whitening Trade.” In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Colour Matters, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, 166–87. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Goffman, Erving. 1973 [1959]. Wir alle spielen Theater. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  37. Gupta, Dipankar. 2000. Interrogating Caste: Understanding Hierarchy and Difference in Indian Society. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  38. Hammond, Allen L., and C. K. Prahalad. 2004. “Selling to the Poor.” Foreign Policy, 20 November 2017. Available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/27/selling-to-Inthe-poor/.
  39. Harris, Angela P. 2009. “Introduction.” In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Colour Matters, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, 1–5. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hunter, Margaret L. 2002. “‘If You’re Light You’re Alright’: Light Skin Colour as Social Capital for Women of Colour.” Gender & Society 16 (2): 175–93.Google Scholar
  41. Hunter, Margaret L. 2005. Race, Gender, and the Politics of Skin Tone. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Hunter, Margaret L. 2011. “Buying Racial Capital: Skin Bleaching and Cosmetic Surgery in a Globalized World.” The Journal of Pan African Studies 4 (4): 142–64.Google Scholar
  43. Hussein, Nazia. 2010. “Colour of Life Achievements: Historical and Media Influence of Identity Formation Based on Skin Colour in South Asia.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 31 (4): 403–24.Google Scholar
  44. John, Mary E. 1998. “Feminism in India and the West: Recasting a Relationship.” Cultural Dynamics 10 (2): 197–209.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, Gordon. 1970. “Chitpavan Brahmins and Politics in Western India in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” In Elites in South Asia, edited by Edmund Leach and S. N. Mukherjee, 95–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kang, Miliann. 2010. The Managed Hand: Race, Gender, and the Body in Beauty Service Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Koppetsch, Cornelia, ed. 2000. “Introduction.” In Körper und Status. Zur Soziologie der Attraktivität, 7–16. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.Google Scholar
  48. Krishan, Kavita. 2013. “Sexuelle Gewalt und Widerstand.” In Speak up! Sozialer Aufbruch und Widerstand in Indien, edited by Elina Fleig, Madhuresh Kumar, and Jürgen Weber, 154–65. Hamburg: Assoziation A.Google Scholar
  49. López, Alfred J. 2005. Postcolonial Whiteness—A Critical Reader on Race and Empire. Albany: State University of New York. Google Scholar
  50. McDuie-Ra, Duncan. 2015. Debating Race in Contemporary India. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Mire, Amine. 2000. “Skin-Bleaching: Poison, Beauty, Power and the Politics of the Colour Line.” Resources for Feminist Research 28 (3 and 4): 13–38.Google Scholar
  53. Nadeem, Shehzad. 2014. “Fair and Anxious: On Mimicry and Skin-Lightening in India.” Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 20: 2–3. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  54. Niranjana, Seemanthini. 2001. Gender and Space: Femininity, Sexualization and the Female Body. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1998. “Foreword.” In Hair: Its Power and Meaning in Asian Cultures, edited by Alf Hiltebeitel and Barbara D. Miller, xi–xiv. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
  56. Osuri, Goldie. 2008. “Beauty and the Bollywood Star: Stories of Skin Colour and Transnational Circulation of Whiteness.” In Cultural Theory in Everyday Practice, edited by Nicole Anderson and Katrina Schlunke, 96–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Parameswaran, Radhika. 2005. “Global Beauty Queens in Post-liberalization India.” Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice 17 (4): 419–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650500374702.
  58. Phadke, Shilpa. 2017. “How to Do Feminist Mothering in Urban India? Some Reflections on the Politics of Beauty and Body Shapes.” In Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism, edited by Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff, 247–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Raj, Kapil. 2007. Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe 1500–1800. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reddy, Deepa S. 2005. “The Ethnicity of Caste.” Anthropological Quarterly 78 (3): 543–84.Google Scholar
  61. Robb, Peter. 1995. The Concept of Race in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Saheli Women’s Resource Center. 2007. Talking Marriage, Caste and Community: Voices from Within. New Delhi: Saheli Women’s Resource Center.Google Scholar
  63. Sahu, Ramakant, Poornima Saxena, and Sapna Johnson. 2014. Heavy Metals in Cosmetics. Centre for Science and Environment. New Delhi. Accessed 4 November 2017. Available at http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/Heavy_Metals_in_Cosmetics_Report.pdf.
  64. Saraswati, L. Ayu. 2010. “Cosmopolitan Whiteness: The Effects and Affects of Skin-Whitening Advertisements in a Transnational Women’s Magazine in Indonesia.” Meridians 10 (2): 15–41.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, Dorothy. 1987. “Women’s Perspective as Radical Critique of Sociology.” In Feminism and Methodology, edited by Sandra Harding, 84–96. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Tagore, Rabindranath. 2009 [1916]. Inside and Outside. New Delhi [Ghare Baire]: Fusion Books.Google Scholar
  68. Tate, Shirley Anne. 2010. “‘Not All Women Want to Be White: Decolonizing Beauty Studies.” In Decolonizing European Sociology, edited by Encarnacion Gutierrez Rodriguez, Manuela Batca, and Sergio Costa, 195–212. Ashgate: Farnham and Burlington.Google Scholar
  69. Tate, Shirley Anne. 2016. Skin Bleaching in Black Atlantic Zones: Shade Shifters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498465.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thapar, Romila. 1971. “The Image of the Barbarian in Early India.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 13 (4): 408–36.Google Scholar
  71. Titzmann, Fritzi-Marie. 2014. Der indische Online-Heiratsmarkt. Medienpraktiken und Frauenbilder im Wandel. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
  72. Villa, Paula-Irene, ed. 2008. “Habe den Mut, dich deines Körpers zu bedienen! Thesen zur Körperarbeit in der Gegenwart zwischen Selbstermächtigung und Selbstunterwerfung.” In Schön normal. Manipulationen am Körper als Technologien des Selbst, 245–72. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  73. WHO. 2011. Mercury in Skin Lightening Products. Geneva, Switzerland. Accessed 5 November 2017. Available at http://www.who.int/ipcs/assessment/public_health/mercury_flyer.pdf.
  74. Yang, Jie. 2017. “Holistic Labour: Gender, Body and the Beauty and Wellness Industry in China.” In Aesthetic Labour. Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism, edited by Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff, 117–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Young, Robert. 2009. Signs of Race in Poststructuralism: Toward a Transformative Theory of Race. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Kullrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Bayreuth UniversityBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations