Advertisement

Migration and the Infrastructural Politics of Urban Arrival

  • Bruno Meeus
  • Bas van Heur
  • Karel Arnaut
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter coins the notion of “arrival infrastructure,” and focuses on two important conceptual innovations. Drawing on debates in migration studies, the chapter differentiates between the politics of directionality, the politics of temporality, and the politics of subjectivity, in order to open up the different dimensions of struggles in the process of arrival. While engaging with critical debates on the current and potential role of cities and the multi-scalar state in shaping processes of arrival, the chapter then gradually moves toward an infrastructural conceptualization of the spatiotemporal and material conditions that shape the politics of arrival. The chapter further describes how the contributors to this volume use and develop the notion of arrival infrastructures, and points to important avenues for future research.

References

  1. Adam, Ilke, and Tiziana Caponio. 2019. “Research on the Multi-level Governance of Migration and Migrant Integration: Reversed Pyramids.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, edited by A. Weinar, S. Bonjour, and A. Zhynomirska. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  2. Agustin, Óscar García, and Martin Bak Jørgensen. 2016. “For the Sake of Workers but Not Immigrant Workers? Social Dumping and Free Movement.” In Solidarity Without Borders: Gramscian Perspectives and Civil Society Alliances, edited by Óscar García Agustin and Martin Bak Jørgensen, 150–168. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Ali, Nadje, Richard Black, and Khalid Koser. 2001. “The Limits to ‘Transnationalism’: Bosnian and Eritrean Refugees in Europe as Emerging Transnational Communities.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 578–600.Google Scholar
  4. Alba, Richard D., and John R. Logan. 1991. “Variations on Two Themes: Racial and Ethnic Patterns in the Attainment of Suburban Residence.” Demography 28 (3): 431–453.Google Scholar
  5. Alba, Richard D., John R. Logan, Brian J. Stults, Gilbert Marzan, and Wenquan Zhang. 1999. “Immigrant Groups in the Suburbs: A Reexamination of Suburbanization and Spatial Assimilation.” American Sociological Review 64: 446–460.Google Scholar
  6. Albeda, Ympkje, Anouk Tersteeg, Stijn Oosterlynck, and Gert Verschraegen. 2017 (OnlineFirst). “Symbolic Boundary Making in Super‐Diverse Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie.Google Scholar
  7. Amin, Ash. 2002. “Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity.” Environment and Planning A 34 (6): 959–980.Google Scholar
  8. Amin, Ash. 2013. “Telescopic Urbanism and the Poor.” City 17 (4): 476–492.Google Scholar
  9. Amin, Ash. 2014. “Lively Infrastructure.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (7–8): 137–161.Google Scholar
  10. Arnaut, Karel, Martha Karrebæk, and Massimiliano Spotti. 2016. “Engaging Superdiversity: The Poiesis-Infrastructure Nexus and Language Practices in Combinatorial Spaces.” In Engaging Superdiversity: Recombining Spaces, Times and Language Practices, edited by Karel Arnaut, Martha Karrebæk, and Massimiliano Spotti, 3–24. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  11. Bache, Ian, and Matthew Flinders. 2004. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Baldassar, Loretta. 2008. “Missing Kin and Longing to be Together: Emotions and the Construction of Co-presence in Transnational Relationships.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 29 (3): 247–266.Google Scholar
  13. Bauböck, Rainer. 2003. “Reinventing Urban Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 7 (2): 139–160.Google Scholar
  14. Bauder, Harald. 2017. “Sanctuary Cities: Policies and Practices in International Perspective.” International Migration 55 (2): 174–187.Google Scholar
  15. Bilger, Veronika, Martin Hofmann, and Michael Jandl. 2006. “Human Smuggling as a Transnational Service Industry: Evidence from Austria.” International Migration 44 (4): 59–93.Google Scholar
  16. Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  17. Blommaert, Jan. 2014. “Infrastructures of Superdiversity: Conviviality and Language in an Antwerp Neighborhood.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (4): 431–451.Google Scholar
  18. Boccagni, Paolo. 2017. “Aspirations and the Subjective Future of Migration: Comparing Views and Desires of the ‘Time Ahead’ Through the Narratives of Immigrant Domestic Workers.” Comparative Migration Studies 5 (1): 4.Google Scholar
  19. Bolt, Gideon, Deborah Phillips, and Ronald Van Kempen. 2010a. “Housing Policy, (De)segregation and Social Mixing: An International Perspective.” Housing Studies 25 (2): 129–135.Google Scholar
  20. Bolt, Gideon, A. Sule Özüekren, and Deborah Phillips. 2010b. “Linking Integration and Residential Segregation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (2): 169–186.Google Scholar
  21. Boudreau, J. A. 2016. Global Urban Politics: Informalization of the State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Bowker, Geoffrey. 1994. “Information Mythology: The World of/as Information.” In Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, edited by Lisa Bud-Frierman, 231–247. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Brambilla, Chiara. 2015. “Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept.” Geopolitics 20 (1): 14–34. Google Scholar
  24. Bunnell, Tim. 2010. “Routes of Identity: Malay Liverpool and the Limits of Transnationalism.” Pacific Affairs 83 (3): 459–480.Google Scholar
  25. Calhoun, Craig, Richard Sennett, and Harel Shapira. 2013. “Poiesis Means Making.” Public Culture 25 (2): 195–200.Google Scholar
  26. Carling, Jørgen, and Francis Collins. 2018. “Aspiration, Desire and Drivers of Migration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (6): 909–926.Google Scholar
  27. Catterall, Bob. 2015. “Editorial: To ‘the City of Refuge’.” City 19 (5): 613–617.Google Scholar
  28. Chauvin, Sébastien, and Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas. 2012. “Beyond Informal Citizenship: The New Moral Economy of Migrant Illegality.” International Political Sociology 6: 241–259.Google Scholar
  29. Collins, Francis. 2011. “Transnational Mobilities and Urban Spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 316–335.Google Scholar
  30. Collins, Francis. 2017. “Desire as a Theory for Migration Studies: Temporality, Assemblage and Becoming in the Narratives of Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 44 (6): 964–980.Google Scholar
  31. Cwerner, Saulo B. 2001. “The Times of Migration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27 (1): 7–36.Google Scholar
  32. Dahinden, J. 2016. “A Plea for the ‘De-migranticization’ of Research on Migration and Integration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (13): 2207–2225.Google Scholar
  33. Dalakoglou, Dimitris. 2016. “Europe’s Last Frontier: The Spatialities of the Refugee Crisis.” City 20 (2): 180–185.Google Scholar
  34. Darling, Jonathan. 2017. “Forced Migration and the City: Irregularity, Informality, and the Politics of Presence.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (2): 178–198.Google Scholar
  35. De Genova, Nicholas. 2013. “Spectacles of Migrant ‘Illegality’: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1180–1198.Google Scholar
  36. De Genova, Nicholas, Sandro Mezzadra, and John Pickles. 2014. “New Keywords: Migration and Borders.” Cultural Studies 29 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  37. De Haas, Hein. 2005. “International Migration, Remittances and Development: Myths and Facts.” Third World Quarterly 26 (8): 1269–1284.Google Scholar
  38. De Haas, Hein. 2010. “Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective.” International Migration Review 44 (1): 227–264.Google Scholar
  39. Downey, Dennis J., and David A. Smith. 2011. “Metropolitan Reconfiguration and Contemporary Zones of Transition: Conceptualizing Border Communities in Postsuburban California.” Journal of Urban Affairs 33 (1): 21–44.Google Scholar
  40. El Moussawi, Hala, and Bruno Meeus. 2016. Refugee Support During and After Moments of Crisis: The Case of the Brussels’ Maximiliaanpark. Paper presented at the RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, London 30 August–2 September 2016.Google Scholar
  41. Elyachar, Julia. 2010. “Phatic Labor, Infrastructure, and the Question of Empowerment in Cairo.” American Ethnologist 37 (3): 452–464.Google Scholar
  42. Elyachar, Julia. 2011. “The Political Economy of Movement and Gesture in Cairo.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (1): 82–99.Google Scholar
  43. Faist, Thomas. 2000. The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Favell, Adrian. 2003. “Integration Nations: The Nation-State and Research on Immigrants in Western Europe.” In Multicultural Challenge (Comparative Social Research, Volume 22), edited by Grete Brochmann, 13–42. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  45. Featherstone, David. 2017. “Afterword. Solidarities, Conjunctures, Encounters.” In Place, Diversity and Solidarity, edited by Stijn Oosterlynck, Maarten Loopmans, and Nick Schuermans, 165–176. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Fernandez, Luis, and Joel Olson. 2011. To Live, Love and Work Anywhere You Please. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3): 412–419.Google Scholar
  47. Geddes, Andrew, and Virginie Guiraudon. 2004. “Britain, France and EU Anti-discrimination Policy: The Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm.” West European Politics 27 (2): 334–353.Google Scholar
  48. Gill, Nick. 2016. Nothing Personal. Geographies of Governing and Activism in the British Asylum System. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Glick Schiller, Nina. 2012. “A Comparative Relative Perspective on the Relationships Between Migrants and Cities.” Urban Geography 33 (6): 879–903.Google Scholar
  50. Glick Schiller, Nina. 2015. “Explanatory Frameworks in Transnational Migration Studies: The Missing Multi-scalar Global Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (13): 2275–2282.Google Scholar
  51. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Ayse Çağlar. 2009. “Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (2): 177–202.Google Scholar
  52. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Ayse Çağlar, eds. 2010. Locating Migration. Rescaling Cities and Migrants. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Ayse Çağlar. 2013. “Locating Migrant Pathways of Economic Emplacement: Thinking Beyond the Ethnic Lens.” Ethnicities 13 (4): 494–514.Google Scholar
  54. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Ayse Çağlar. 2016. “Displacement, Emplacement and Migrant Newcomers: Rethinking Urban Sociabilities Within Multiscalar Power.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 23 (1): 17–34.Google Scholar
  55. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Thomas Faist, eds. 2010. Migration, Development, and Transnationalization: A Critical Stance. Vol. 12. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  56. Glick Schiller, Nina, Linda Basch, and Cristina Blanc‐Szanton. 1992. “Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 645 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  57. Graham, Stephen, ed. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Graham, Stephen, and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Graham, Stephen, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance.” Theory, Culture, Society 24 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  60. Green, Sarah. 2017. “When Infrastructures Fail: An Ethnographic Note in the Middle of an Aegean Crisis.” In Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion, edited by Penny Harvey, Casper Bruun Jensen, and Atsuro Morita, 271–282. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Griffiths, Melanie. 2014. “Out of Time: The Temporal Uncertainties of Refused Asylum Seekers and Immigration Detainees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (12): 1991–2009.Google Scholar
  62. Griffiths, Melanie, Ali Rogers, and Bridget Anderson. 2013. “Migration, Time and Temporalities: Review and Prospect.” COMPAS Research Resources Paper, March 2013.Google Scholar
  63. Hall, Suzanne M., Julia King, and Robin Finlay. 2015. “Envisioning Migration: Drawing the Infrastructure of Stapleton Road, Bristol.” New Diversities 17 (2): 59–72.Google Scholar
  64. Hannam, Kevin, Mimi Sheller, and John Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  65. Harvey, David. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17.Google Scholar
  66. Huang, Shirlena, and Brenda S. A. Yeoh. 2007. “Emotional Labour and Transnational Domestic Work: The Moving Geographies of ‘Maid Abuse’ in Singapore.” Mobilities 2 (2): 195–217.Google Scholar
  67. Isin, Engin F., and Kim Rygiel. 2007. “Abject Spaces: Frontiers, Zones, Camps”. In The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror: Living, Dying, Surviving, edited by Elizabeth Dauphinee and Christina Masters, 181–203. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Jamal, Amal. 2016. “Conflict Theory, Temporality, and Transformative Temporariness: Lessons from Israel and Palestine.” Constellations 23 (3): 365–377.Google Scholar
  69. Jeffrey, Alex (2012). The Improvised State: Sovereignty, Performance and Agency in Dayton Bosnia. London: Wiley. Google Scholar
  70. King, Russell, Mark Thomson, Tony Fielding, and Tony Warnes. 2006. “Time, Generations and Gender in Migration and Settlement.” The Dynamics of International Migration and Settlement in Europe 233: 68.Google Scholar
  71. Kleinman, Julie. 2014. “Adventures in Infrastructure: Making an African Hub in Paris.” City & Society 26 (3): 286–307.Google Scholar
  72. Lagendijk, Arnoud, Roos Pijpers, Geert Ent, Renée Hendrikx, Bram van Lanen, and Laura Maussart. 2011. “Multiple Worlds in a Single Street: Ethnic Entrepreneurship and the Construction of a Global Sense of Place.” Space and Polity 15 (2): 163–181.Google Scholar
  73. Latham, Robert, Leah F. Vosko, Valerie Preston, and Melisa Bretón. 2014. “Liberating Temporariness? Imagining Alternatives to Permanence as a Pathway for Social Inclusion.” In Liberating Temporariness: Migration, Work and Citizenship in an Age of Insecurity, edited by Leah F. Vosko, Valerie Preston, and Robert Latham, 3–31. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Leitner, Helga, and Christopher Strunk. 2014. “Spaces of Immigrant Advocacy and Liberal Democratic Citizenship.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (2): 348–356.Google Scholar
  75. Leitner, Helga, Eric Sheppard, and Kristin M. Sziarto. 2008. “The Spatialities of Contentious Politics.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2): 157–172.Google Scholar
  76. Lentin, Alana, and Gavan Titley. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  77. Levitt, Peggy, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2004. “Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 1002–1039.Google Scholar
  78. Lin, Weiqiang, Johan Lindquist, Biao Xiang, and Brenda S. A. Yeoh. 2017. “Migration Infrastructures and the Production of Migrant Mobilities.” Mobilities 12 (2): 167–174.Google Scholar
  79. Lindley, Anna. 2014. “Exploring Crisis and Migration: Concepts and Issues.” In Crisis and Migration: Critical Perspectives, edited by A. Lindley, 1–23. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Lindquist, Johan. 2017. “Brokers, Channels, Infrastructure: Moving Migrant Labor in the Indonesian-Malaysian Oil Palm Complex.” Mobilities 12 (2): 213–226.Google Scholar
  81. Lugo, Alejandro. 2000. “Theorizing Border Inspections.” Cultural Dynamics 12 (3): 353–373.Google Scholar
  82. Massey, Douglas. 1985. “Ethnic Residential Segregation: A Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Review.” Sociology and Social Research 69: 315–350.Google Scholar
  83. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Meeus, Bruno. 2014. Arrival Infrastructures in Brussels: Romanians Between Individual and Collective Social Mobility. Superdiversity: Theory, Method and Practice. University of Birmingham, 23–24 June 2014.Google Scholar
  85. Meeus, Bruno. 2017. “Challenging the Figure of the ‘Migrant Entrepreneur’. Place-based Solidarity in the Romanian Arrival Infrastructure in Brussels.” In Place, Diversity and Solidarity, edited by S. Oosterlynck, M. Loopmans, and N. Schuermans, 91–108. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Mezzadra, Sandro. 2015. “The Proliferation of Borders and the Right to Escape.” In The Irregularization of Migration in Contemporary Europe: Detention, Deportation, Drowning, 121–135. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  87. Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2012. “Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders.” Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 58–75.Google Scholar
  88. Minca, Claudio. 2015. “Geographies of the Camp.” Political Geography 49: 74–83.Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell, Katharyne. 1997. “Different Diasporas and the Hype of Hybridity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (5): 533–553.Google Scholar
  90. Murdie, Robert, and Sutama Ghosh. 2010. “Does Spatial Concentration Always Mean a Lack of Integration? Exploring Ethnic Concentration and Integration in Toronto.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (2): 293–311.Google Scholar
  91. Mutsaers, Paul. 2014. “An Ethnographic Study of the Policing of Internal Borders in the Netherlands: Synergies Between Criminology and Anthropology.” British Journal of Criminology 54 (5): 831–848.Google Scholar
  92. Nicholls, Walter. 2015. “Policing Immigrants as Politicizing Immigration: The Paradox of Border Enforcement.” ACME 14 (2): 512–521.Google Scholar
  93. Pallister-Wilkins, Polly. 2018 (OnlineFirst). “Hotspots and the Geographies of Humanitarianism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263775818754884.
  94. Papadopoulos, Dimitris, and Vassilis S. Tsianos. 2013. “After Citizenship: Autonomy of Migration, Organisational Ontology and Mobile Commons.” Citizenship Studies 17 (2): 178–196.Google Scholar
  95. Papadopoulos, Dimitris, Niamh Stephenson, and Vassilis Tsianos. 2008. Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the Twenty-First Century. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  96. Papadopoulou-Kourkoula, Aspasia. 2008. Transit Migration: The Missing Link Between Emigration and Settlement. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  97. Penninx, Rinus. 2015. European Cities in Search of Knowledge for Their Integration Policies. In Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues, edited by Peter Scholten, Han Enzinger, Rinus Penninx, and Stijn Verbeek, 99–115. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  98. Portes, Alejandro, Luis E. Guarnizo, and Patricia Landolt. 1999. “The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (2): 217–237.Google Scholar
  99. Ramadan, Adam. 2013. “Spatialising the Refugee Camp.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (1): 65–77.Google Scholar
  100. Riaño, Yvonne. 2017. “Conceptualising Space in Transnational Migration Studies. A Critical Perspective.” In Border Transgression. Mobility and Mobilization in Crisis, edited by E. Youkhana, 35–48. Bonn: Bonn University Press and V & R Academic.Google Scholar
  101. Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller. 1992. “Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205.Google Scholar
  102. Samers, Michael. 2010. Migration. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Sanyal, Romola. 2011. “Squatting in Camps: Building and Insurgency in Spaces of Refuge.” Urban Studies 48 (5): 877–890.Google Scholar
  104. Saunders, Doug. 2011. Arrival city. London: Windmill Books.Google Scholar
  105. Scheibelhofer, Paul. 2016. “‘How Would You React If You Learned That Your Son Was Gay?’ Racialized Sexualities and the Production of Migrant Others in Europe.” In An Anthology of Migration and Social Transformation, edited by Anna Amelina, Ken Horvath, and Bruno Meeus, 295–306. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  106. Schrooten, Mieke, Dirk Geldof, and Sophie Withaeckx. 2016. “Transmigration and Urban Social Work: Towards a Research Agenda.” European Journal of Social Work 19 (1): 18–30.Google Scholar
  107. Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. “People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg.” Public Culture 16 (3): 407–429.Google Scholar
  108. Smith, Michael Peter. 2001. Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalisation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  109. Smith, Michael Peter. 2005. “Transnational Urbanism Revisited.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 235–244.Google Scholar
  110. Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” The American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391.Google Scholar
  111. Star, Susan Leigh, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2002. “How to Infrastructure?” In The Handbook of New Media. Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, edited by Leah A. Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone, 151–162. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Trimikliniotis, Nicos, Dimitris Parsanoglou, and Vassilis S. Tsianos. 2016. “Mobile Commons and/in Precarious Spaces: Mapping Migrant Struggles and Social Resistance.” Critical Sociology 42 (7–8): 1035–1049.Google Scholar
  113. Van Heur, Bas. 2017. “Creative Cities and the Infrastructural Fragmentation of Socioeconomic Space.” In Unlocking the Creative City: Re-assembling Why Cities are Agents of Change and Innovation, edited by Ilja Van Damme, Bert De Munck, and Andrew Miles, 261–270. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  114. Vertovec, Steven, and Susanne Wessendorf, eds. 2010. Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  115. Vosko, Leah F., Valerie Preston, and Robert Latham. 2014. Liberating Temporariness? Migration, Work, and Citizenship in an Age of Insecurity. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Waldinger, Roger. 1989. “Immigration and Urban Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 15 (1): 211–232.Google Scholar
  117. Walters, William. 2004. “Secure Borders, Safe Haven, Domopolitics.” Citizenship Studies 8 (3): 237–260.Google Scholar
  118. Werbner, Pnina. 2001. “Metaphors of Spatiality and Networks in the Plural City: A Critique of the Ethnic Enclave Economy Debate.” Sociology 35 (3): 671–693.Google Scholar
  119. Wessendorf, Susanne. 2017. “Pioneer Migrants and Their Social Relations in Super-Diverse London.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1406126.
  120. Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation–State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334.Google Scholar
  121. Xiang, Biao, and J. Johan Lindquist. 2014. “Migration Infrastructure.” International Migration Review 48 (s1): S122–S148. Google Scholar
  122. Yeoh, Brenda S. A. 2006. “Bifurcated Labour: The Unequal Incorporation of Transmigrants in Singapore.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 97 (1): 26–37.Google Scholar
  123. Zelinsky, Wilbur, and Barrett A. Lee. 1998. “Heterolocalism: An Alternative Model of the Sociospatial Behaviour of Immigrant Ethnic Communities.” International Journal of Population Geography 4 (4): 281.Google Scholar
  124. Zigon, Jarrett. 2014. “An Ethics of Dwelling and a Politics of World-Building: A Critical Response to Ordinary Ethics.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20 (4): 746–764.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Meeus
    • 1
  • Bas van Heur
    • 2
  • Karel Arnaut
    • 3
  1. 1.University of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  2. 2.Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations