Advertisement

Applying Studio-Based Learning Methodology in Computer Science Education to Improve 21st Century Skills

  • Blanca J. PoloEmail author
  • Paula Alexandra SilvaEmail author
  • Martha E. CrosbyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10925)

Abstract

While new generations of students tend to isolate themselves from the world by surrounding themselves with electronics, companies demand that their employees be people-oriented with a high degree of social skills. In a world where the reliance on distance education further fosters isolation, Studio-Based Learning may be the tool to provide students with the much demanded 21st century skills.

Keywords

Studio based learning Soft skills Computer science education Online education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by National Science Foundation grant CNS-0939157. The work of the second author was developed under the support of the Research Program “CeNTER - Community-led Territorial Innovation” (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000002), funded by Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (CENTRO 2020), PT2020.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim, K., Bonk, C.: The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says (2006). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2006/1/the-future-of-online-teaching-and-learning-in-higher-education-the-survey-says. Accessed Oct 2017
  2. 2.
    Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., Bannan, B.: Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 9(2), 7–26 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laurillard, D.: Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective use of Learning Technologies, 2nd edn. Routledge Falmer, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 9, 1–6 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J.: Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26, 332–343 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeBard, R.: Millennials coming to college. New Dir. Stud. Serv. 2004, 33–45 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Institute for teaching and Learning Innovation. The University of Queensland: Future Trends in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (2015). https://itali.uq.edu.au/filething/get/3419/Final_Future_trends_in_teaching_and_learning_in_higher_e. Accessed Oct 2017
  8. 8.
    Soffel, J.: What Are the 21st-Century Skills Every Student Needs? World Economic Forum (2016). www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students/ Accessed Oct 2017
  9. 9.
    Cassel, R.N., Kolstad, R.: Critical job-skill requirements for 21st century: living and working with people. J. Instr. Psychol. 25(3), 176 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thierry, V., Lord, D.: Critical success factors in online education. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 14(5), 216–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen, E., Seaman, J.: Sloan Consortium. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States, PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Polo, B.J.: SBL-online: implementing studio-based learning techniques in an online introductory programming course to address common programming errors and misconceptions. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Casares, J., Dickson, D., Hannigan, T., Hinton, J., Phelps, A.: The future of teaching and learning in higher education (2012). https://www.rit.edu/academicaffairs/sites/rit.edu.academicaffairs/files/docs/future_of_teaching_and_learning_reportv13.pdf. Accessed Oct 2016
  14. 14.
    Boulos, M.N.K., Maramba, I.: Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med. Educ. 6(1), 41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teamwork Merriam-Webster. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/teamwork. Accessed Oct 2017
  16. 16.
    Pfaff, E., Huddleston, P.: Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. J. Mark. Educ. 25(1), 37–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weimer, M.: Why Students Hate Groups. Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning (2008). www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/why-students-hate-groups/. Accessed Oct 2016
  18. 18.
    Savery, J.R.: Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip. J. Prob. Based Learn. 1(1) (2015). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
  19. 19.
    Brocato, K.: Studio based learning: proposing, critiquing, iterating our way to person-centeredness for better classroom management. Theory Into Pract. 48(2), 138–146 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hundhausen, C., Agrawal, C., Fairbrother, D., Trevisan, M.: Does studio-based instruction work in CS 1? An empirical comparison with a traditional approach. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kolb, A., Kolb, D.: Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 4(2), 193–212 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brame, C.: Flipping the classroom (2013). http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/Flipping-the-classroom.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2013
  23. 23.
    Docherty, M., Sutton, P., Bereton, M., Kaplan, S.: An innovative design and studio-based CS degree. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 33(1), 233–237 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hundhausen, C.D., Narayanan, N.H., Crosby, M.E.: Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 40, 392 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1352322.1352271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silva, P.A., Crosby, Martha E., Polo, Blanca J.: Studio-based learning as a natural fit to teaching human-computer interaction. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8510, pp. 251–258. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07233-3_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Estey, A., Long, J., Gooch, B., Gooch, A.A.: Investigating studio-based learning in a course on game design. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2010 (2010, 2014).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1822348.1822357
  27. 27.
    Hendrix, D., Myneni, L., Narayanan, H., Ross, M.: Implementing studio-based learning in CS2. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2010 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734433
  28. 28.
    Lynch, K., Carbone, A., Arnott, D.: A studio-based approach to teaching information technology. In: Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Computers in Education Conference on Computers in Education: Australian Topics 8. Australian Computer Society, Inc (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simpson, M., Burmeister, J., Boykiw, A., Zhu, J.: Successful studio-based real-world projects in IT education, vol. 20, pp. 41–51 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barker, L.J., Mcdowell, C., Kalahar, K.: Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 41, 153 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reimer, Y.J., Douglas, S.A.: Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Comput. Sci. Educ. 13, 191–205 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.3.191.14945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Partnership for 21st Century Learning: Framework for 21st Century Learning (2007). www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf
  33. 33.
    Dede, C.: Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In: 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn, vol. 20, pp. 51–76 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Collaboration | Definition of collaboration in English by Oxford Dictionaries. In: Oxford Dictionaries | English. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/collaboration
  36. 36.
    Concept and Definition of Critical Thinking. In: Our Conception of Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-concept-and-definition-of-critical-thinking/411
  37. 37.
    Creativity. In: Dictionary.com. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/creativity
  38. 38.
    Innovation. In: Dictionary.com. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/innovation?s=t
  39. 39.
    Hamer, J., Sheard, J., Cutts, Q., et al.: Contributing student pedagogy. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 40, 194 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1473195.1473242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hundhausen, C., Agrawal, A., Ryan, K.: The design of an online environment to support pedagogical code reviews. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2010 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734324
  41. 41.
    ODEP - Office of Disability Employment Policy. In: U.S. Department of Labor – ODEP - Office of Disability Employment Policy - Youth in Transition - Soft Skills to Pay the Bills – Mastering Soft Skills for Workplace Success. https://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/youth/softskills/Teamwork.pdf
  42. 42.
    Gerhinger, E., Ehresman, L., Conger, S., Wagle, P.: Reusable learning objects through peer review: the expertiza approach. Innov. J. Online Educ. 3(5) (2008)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trivedi, A., Kar, D.C., Patterson-McNeill, H.: Automatic assignment management and peer evaluation. J. Comput. Small Coll. 18(4), 30–3738 (2003). Innovation. In: Dictionary.com. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/innovation?s=tGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Curtis, D., Lawson, M.: Exploring collaborative online learning. J. Asynchron. Learn. Netw. 5(1), 21–34 (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silva, P.A., Polo, Blanca J., Crosby, Martha E.: Adapting the studio based learning methodology to computer science education. In: Fee, Samuel B., Holland-Minkley, Amanda M., Lombardi, Thomas E. (eds.) New Directions for Computing Education, pp. 119–142. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Hawaiʻi, Leeward Community CollegePearl CityUSA
  2. 2.DigiMedia Research CentreUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.The University of Hawaiʻi at MānoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations