Blood Flows in Vascular Networks: Numerical Results vs Experimental Data

  • T. K. Dobroserdova
  • A. A. Cherevko
  • E. A. Sakharova


The goal of this work is to compare the numerical results calculated by the 1D blood flow model with experimental data. In the first case the fluid flow in the network of silicone tubes is simulated. Numerical results are in good agreement with measured experimental data. We showed that neglecting tapered vessel form helps to save computational time without significant loss of results quality. In the second case the fluid flow in the bifurcation of carotid arteries is simulated. The model was not able to reproduce the experimental data because of fluid flow complexity. Boundary conditions at bifurcation node should be refined for this case.



This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant 14-31-00024. The authors are grateful to A.Chupakhin, N.Denisenko, A.Yanchenko for measured data used in Sect. 4 (the data obtained with support of RFBR 17-08-01736 grant).


  1. 1.
    N. Bessonov, A. Sequeira, S. Simakov et al., Methods of blood flow modelling. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 11(1), 1–25 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Danilov, Yu. Ivanov, R. Pryamonosov et al., Methods of graph network reconstruction in personalized medicine. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng. 32(8), e02754 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Dobroserdova, S. Simakov, T. Gamilov et al., Patient-specific blood flow modelling for medical applications. MATEC Web Conf. 76(21), 05001 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Boileau, P. Nithiarasu, P.J. Blanco, A benchmark study of numerical schemes for one-dimensional arterial blood flow modelling. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng. 31(10), e02732 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Simakov, A. Kholodov, Computational study of oxygen concentration in human blood under low frequency disturbances. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 1(2), 283295 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu.V. Vassilevski, V.Yu. Salamatova, S.S. Simakov, On the elasticity of blood vessels in one dimensional problems of hemodynamics. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 55(9), 1567–1578 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. Vassilevskii, S. Simakov, V. Salamatova et al., Numerical issues of modelling blood flow in networks of vessels with pathologies. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Model. 26(6), 605–622 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y.V. Vassilevski, A.A. Danilov, S.S. Simakov, Patient-specific anatomical models in human physiology. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Model. 30(3), 185–201 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Alastruey, A. Khir, K. Matthys et al., Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: assessment of 1-D visco-elastic simulations against in vitro measurements. J. Biomech. 44(12), 2250–2258 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.S. Denisenko, A.P. Chupakhin, A.K. Khe, A.A. Cherevko et al., Experimental measurements and visualisation of a viscous fluid flow in Y-branching modelling the common carotid artery bifurcation with MR and Doppler ultrasound velocimetry. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 722 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. K. Dobroserdova
    • 1
  • A. A. Cherevko
    • 2
  • E. A. Sakharova
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Numerical Mathematics RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Lavrentyev Institute of Hydrodynamics SB RASNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations