Advertisement

Robotic Mediastinal Surgery

  • Boris D. Hristov
  • Prasad S. Adusumilli
  • Bernard J. Park
Chapter

Abstract

Mediastinal masses have traditionally been resected using open approaches such as sternotomy and thoracotomy. These approaches require comparatively large incisions and may result in significant morbidity and protracted hospitalization. Minimally invasive approaches, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic procedures, result in improved patient recovery and decreased length of hospital stay and have therefore become increasingly commonly used. Compared with standard VATS instrumentation, the telerobotic platform allows an increased range of motion and ease of manipulation, which can be beneficial for cases where the operative field and surgical maneuverability are constrained by the confines of the chest wall and the surrounding organs. Robotic approaches may also improve cosmesis, reduce postoperative pain, and shorten recovery times. In this chapter, we discuss considerations for robotic mediastinal surgery and describe in detail a robotic thymectomy technique.

Keywords

Thymectomy Mediastinum Myasthenia gravis Thymoma Thymus Robotic surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferguson MK. Difficult decisions in thoracic surgery. 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar A, Asaf BB. Robotic thoracic surgery: the state of the art. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:60–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falk V, Walther T, Autschbach R, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Mohr FW. Robot-assisted minimally invasive solo mitral valve operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:470–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Robison RJ. Long-term follow-up after robotic thymectomy for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1018–22; discussion 22–3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schneiter D, Tomaszek S, Kestenholz P, Hillinger S, Opitz I, Inci I, et al. Minimally invasive resection of thymomas with the da Vinci(R) surgical system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:288–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rueckert J, Swierzy M, Badakhshi H, Meisel A, Ismail M. Robotic-assisted thymectomy: surgical procedure and results. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:194–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ding R, Tong X, Xu S, Zhang D, Gao X, Teng H, et al. A comparative study of Da Vinci robot system with video-assisted thoracoscopy in the surgical treatment of mediastinal lesions. Chin J Lung Cancer. 2014;17:557–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismail M, Swierzy M, Ruckert RI, Ruckert JC. Robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24:189–95, vi–viiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz GS, Yang SC. Robotic thymectomy for thymic neoplasms. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24:197–201, viiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Givel J-C. Surgery of the thymus. 5th ed. In: Givel J-C, Merlini M, Clarke DB, Dusmet M, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 245–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skeie GO, Apostolski S, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Harms L, et al. Guidelines for treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular transmission disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:893–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu S, Ding R, Liu B, Meng H, Wang T, Wang S. Technical highlights of robotic-assisted mediastinal tumor resection. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:84.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris D. Hristov
    • 1
  • Prasad S. Adusumilli
    • 1
  • Bernard J. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Thoracic Service, Department of SurgeryMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations