Advertisement

Shock Wave Propagation Through a Series of Perforated Plates

  • O. RamEmail author
  • G. Ben-Dor
  • O. Sadot
Conference paper

Abstract

A simplified analysis can be employed to predict the pressure buildup behind a porous barrier fairly accurately without resorting to numerical modeling. A macroscopic approach is used in which the pressure buildup behind the porous barrier is analyzed in relation to the load inflicted on its front face thus allowing finding the effects of the different parameters of the porous barrier. This method was successfully employed to study the impingement of shock waves and blast waves on stiff silicon carbide foams and more recently on buildings that had enough internal divisions as to be considered as a low porosity medium. In this study, the methodology is employed to study a porous barrier comprised from an array of perforated plates with various porosities to determine the parameters affecting the pressure buildup behind it. Perforated plates were chosen since the geometry of the barriers assembled from the plates is simple enough so it can be exactly defined, and still the shock structure and the developing fields are so complicated that only few studies attempted to deal with similar scenarios in the past. In fact, previous studies were limited to one or two perforated plates. In the experiments presented, 3 mm plates were placed 8 mm apart inside a 32 mm by 32 mm shock tube. The last plate was mounted 10 mm from the end wall. The plates were drilled to accommodate various blockage ratios (defined as blocked to open area ratio) ranging from 50% to 80%. It was found that the volume of air confined inside the porous medium undergoes an adiabatic process, and thus the pressure buildup time at the end wall depends on the volume to the power of the heat capacities ratio.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Levy, G. Ben-Dor, B.W. Skews, S. Sorek, Head-on collision of normal shock waves with rigid porous materials. Exp. Fluids 15, 183–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Ram, O. Sadot, A simple constitutive model for predicting the pressure histories developed behind rigid porous media impinged by shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 718, 507–523 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.627 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Ram, O. Sadot, Analysis of the pressure buildup behind rigid porous media impinged by shock waves in time and frequency domains. J. Fluid Mech. 779, 842–858 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.463 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Levy, S. Sorek, G. Ben-Dor, J. Bear, Evolution of the balance equations in saturated thermoelastic porous media following abrupt simultaneous changes in pressure and temperature. Transp. Porous Media 21, 241–268 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00617408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Chaudhuri, A. Hadjadj, O. Sadot, G. Ben-Dor, Numerical study of shock-wave mitigation through matrices of solid obstacles. Shock Waves 23, 91–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-012-0362-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Naiman, D.D. Knight, The effect of porosity on shock interaction with a rigid, porous barrier. Shock Waves 16, 321–337 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-007-0077-y CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Berger, O. Sadot, G. Ben-Dor, Experimental investigation on the shock-wave load attenuation by geometrical means. Shock Waves 20, 29–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-009-0237-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Sha, Z. Chen, X. Jiang, J. Han, Numerical investigations on blast wave attenuation by obstacles. Procedia Eng 45, 453–457 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Ben-Dor, A. Britan, T. Elperin, O. Igra, J.P. Jiang, Experimental investigation of the interaction between weak shock waves and granular layers. Exp. Fluids 22, 432–443 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050069 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Britan, G. Ben-Dor, Shock tube study of the dynamical behavior of granular materials. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 32, 623–642 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.01.007 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.W. Skews, K. Takayama, Flow through a perforated surface due to shock-wave impact. J. Fluid Mech. 314, 27 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096000225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Britan, A.V. Karpov, E.I. Vasilev, O. Igra, G. Ben-Dor, E. Shapiro, Experimental and numerical study of shock wave interaction with perforated plates. J. Fluids Eng. 126, 399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1758264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Onodera, Shape of a shock wave front diffracting on a perforated wall. Exp. Fluids 24, 238–245 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Kontis, R. An, H. Zare-Behtash, D. Kounadis, Head-on collision of shock wave induced vortices with solid and perforated walls. Phys. Fluids 20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2837172
  15. 15.
    S. Seeraj, B.W. Skews, Dual-element directional shock wave attenuators. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 33, 503–516 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Skews, Shock wave interaction with porous plates. Exp. Fluids 39, 875–884 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0023-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. Ram, E. Nof, O. Sadot, Dependence of the blast load penetrating into a structure on initial conditions and internal geometry. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 78, 65–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shock Tube Laboratory, Protective Technologies R&D CenterBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations