Advertisement

Influence of Dual Ignition on Test Conditions of a High-Enthalpy Shock Tunnel

  • Q. Wang
  • W. ZhaoEmail author
  • J. W. Li
  • J. P. Li
  • P. Lu
  • Z. L. Jiang
Conference paper

Abstract

The forward mode is usually chosen to achieve high-enthalpy flows for a detonation-driven shock tunnel. In this paper, the dual-ignition system was developed to burst a metal diaphragm without its fragmentation under the forward operation mode. The influence of delay time on the test conditions of the high-enthalpy shock tunnel was investigated numerically. Results showed that the delay time should be set exactly, or it would affect the performance of the shock tunnel using the dual-ignition forward driving mode, i.e., the effective test or the stagnation temperature. The larger the delay time, the closer the CJ plane propagates to the primary diaphragm, the better consistent with the forward mode.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11402275 and 11472280).

References

  1. 1.
    Q. Wang et al., Comparative study on aerodynamic heating under perfect and nonequilibrium hypersonic flows. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 59(2), 1–7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.L. Gai et al., Stagnation point heat flux in hypersonic high enthalpy flows. Shock Waves 2(1), 43–47 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Zhao et al., Performance of a detonation driven shock tunnel. Shock Waves 14(1–2), 53–59 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. A. Bird, A Note on Combustion Driven Tubes, AGARD Report (May 1957)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.H.K. Lee, Detonation driven in a shock tube. AIAA J. 5(4), 791–792 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.R. Yu et al., Gaseous detonation driver for a shock tunnel. Shock Waves 2(4), 245–254 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. I. Erdos, et al., Dual Mode Shock Expansion/Reflected-Shock Tunnel, AIAA Paper 97–0560 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.K. Lu et al., Recent advances in detonation techniques for high-enthalpy facilities. AIAA J. 38(9), 1676–1684 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. L. Jiang et al., Experiments and Development of the Long-test-duration Hypervelocity Detonation-driven Shock Tunnel (LHDst), AIAA 2014-1012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. W. Li et al., Performance of a Detonation Driven Shock Tunnel, AIAA 2017-2306Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Sichel et al., A Two-step kinetics model for numerical simulation of explosion and detonation in H2-O2 mixtures. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 49–82 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Park, Review of chemical-kinetic problems of future NASA missions, I: Earth entries. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 7(3), 385–398 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z.L. Jiang et al., Dispersion conditions for non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes and its applications. Comput. Fluid Dyn. J. 4(2), 137–150 (1995)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.P. Li et al., Numerical study on backward-forward double detonation driver for high-enthalpy shock tubes. Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 39(3), 343–349 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Q. Wang
    • 1
  • W. Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J. W. Li
    • 1
  • J. P. Li
    • 1
  • P. Lu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Z. L. Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, Institute of MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Engineering ScienceUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations