The Internet and the Treasure House of Information

  • Majid Mohammadi


Another context of the reform movement was the new communication tools. The Internet was introduced into the Iranian public sphere in 1998. After only five years, almost every governmental and private institution, medium, political party and non-governmental organization had its own website. The government has filtered more than six million websites but this has not stopped a large number of political activists from establishing their own websites and publishing statements, essays and journal entries almost every day. Although some of these websites have only propaganda and commercials, the sponsors and gatekeepers have begun to gather, compose and disclose their information to publish descriptive or analytical essays and stories to generate more visitors. They have also made access to some parts of their archives possible.

Spreading the Internet to Iranian society opened the lid of a treasure trove of information that has led to a more open public sphere, and the Iranian government cannot resist this trend. Virtual social networks had a defining role in the Green Movement of 2009. This, of course, does not mean that the Internet alone will democratize or liberalize Iranian society, strengthen civil society institutions and make censorship impossible. The chapter adopts a case-oriented and causal/analytical comparative method to study the neutralizing effect of increasing Internet access and thus the number of websites that describe the institutional and cultural limitations on the free flow of information.


  1. Arabshahi, P. 1998. The Internet in Iran: A Survey.
  2. Foster, William, and Seymour E. Goodman. 2000. The Diffusion of the Internet in China. Stanford, CA: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  3. Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Human Rights Watch. 1999. The Internet in the Middle East and North Africa: Free Expression and Censorship. New York: Human Rights Watch; Mosaic Group, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kalathil, Shanthi. 2001. The Internet in Asia: Broadband or Broad Bans? Foreign Service Journal 78 (2, February): 21–36.Google Scholar
  7. Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kedzie, Christopher R. 1997. Communication and Democracy: Coincident Revolutions and the Emergent Dictator’s Dilemma. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  9. Lynch, Daniel C. 1999. After the Propaganda State: Media, Politics and “Thought Work” in Reformed China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rodan, Garry. 1998. The Internet and Political Control in Singapore. Political Science Quarterly 113 (1, Spring): 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwartz, Edward. 1996. Netactivism: How Citizens Use the Internet. Sebastopol, CA: Songline Studios.Google Scholar
  13. Taubman, Geoffry. 1998. A Not-So World Wide Web: The Internet, China, and the Challenges to Non-Democratic Rule. Political Communication 15: 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Majid Mohammadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Radio Free EuropeStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations