Advertisement

“Our Westerner”: The Role of Romanian-naturalized Youth in Reconfiguring Moldavian Transnational Families

  • Iulia-Elena Hossu
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 15)

Abstract

In this paper, I shall present the itinerary of young people in the process of becoming “Romanian” and the roles these “Westerners” play in restructuring the lives of Moldavian transnational families. The paper also focuses on the role played by young Moldavian people in their families of origin, which are largely developed and anchored in a traditional society, yet connected to a socialist mentality (Leccardi C, Feixa C, Introduction. Youth in transition(s). In: Leccardi C, Feixa C, Kovacheva S, Reiter H, Sekulić T (eds) 1989 – young people and social change after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, pp 5–13, 2012), throughout the process of reorganizing the lives of Moldavian transnational families. At the same time, the study will show how these young people represent the driving force in the process of reacquiring Romanian citizenship by Moldavian citizens. The research is based on the qualitative analysis of data obtained through live audio and video interviews with transnational family members and key people from three communities from the Republic of Moldova: two rural (Cornești, Funduri Vechi) and one urban (Chișinău). The selected cases illustrate the patterns of migration tracks of young Moldavians who have acquired Romanian citizenship and, at the same time, how their routes have influenced the structure, relations and practices of their families of origin. One of the conclusions of the analysis highlights the existence of different patterns concerning the way in which Moldavian citizens relate to this double citizenship; this is also reflected in their way of ‘doing family’ (Morgan DHJ, Rethinking family practices. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2011). In turn, the paper will give voice to family members living both in Romania and in Moldova.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN II-RU-TE-2014 4-2087.

References

  1. Abiala, K. (2014). Young Moldovan women at the crossroads: Between patriarchy and transnational labour markets. In N. Götz (Ed.), The sea of identities. A century of baltic and East European experiences with nationality, class, and gender (pp. 269–289). Huddinge: Södertörn University.Google Scholar
  2. Baldassar, L. (2001). Visits home: Migration experiences between Italy and Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baldassar, L., & Baldock, C. (2000). Linking migration and family studies: Transnational migrants and the care of ageing parents. In B. Agozino (Ed.), Theoretical and methodological issues in migration research: Interdisciplinary, intergenerational and international perspectives (pp. 61–89). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Baldock, C. V. (2000). Migrants and their parents: Caregiving from a distance. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 205–224.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauböck, R. (2003). Towards a political theory of migrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37, 700–723.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00155.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beks, M., & Graur, O. (2006). Cultural politics in Moldova: Undermining the transition? In Transitions La Moldavie: Entre deux mondes? [Moldova: Between two worlds?], 45, 17–41. http://cevipol.ulb.ac.be/sites/default/files/Contenu/Cevipol/graur-17-41.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2017.
  7. Bloch, A. (2014). Citizenship, belonging, and Moldovan migrants in post-Soviet Russia. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 79(4), 445–472.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2012.751929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosniak, L. (2000). Citizenship denationalized (the state of citizenship symposium). Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 447–509. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol7/iss2/2. Accessed 21 Sep 2017.
  9. Brubaker, Rogers W. (1992). Citizenship struggles in soviet states. The International Migration Review, 26(2), 269–291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2547057. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (Eds.). (2002). The transnational family. New European Frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cheianu-Andrei, D., Gramma, R., & Milicenco, S. (2011). Necesităţile specifice ale copiilor şi vârstnicilor lăsaţi fără îngrijirea membrilor de familie plecaţi la muncă peste hotare. Chișinău: CEP USM.Google Scholar
  12. Cuc, M., Lundbäck, E., & Ruggiero, E. (2005). Migration and remittances in Moldova. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  13. Culic, I. (2008). Eluding exit and entry controls: Romanian and Moldovan immigrants in the European Union. East European Politics and Societies, 22(1), 145–170.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325407311795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culic, I. (2009). Dual citizenship policies in central and Eastern Europe, Studii de atelier ISPMN, 15. Cluj-Napoca: Institute for Research in National Minorities.Google Scholar
  15. Deletant, D. (1990). Language policy and linguistic trends in soviet Moldavia. In M. Kirkwood (Ed.), Language planning in the soviet union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20301-7_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dressler, W. (2006). Between empires and Europe: The tragic fate of Moldova. Diogenes, 210, 53(2), 29–49.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192106065970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumbravă, C. (2016). Reproducing the nation: Reproduction, citizenship and ethno-demographic survival in post-communist Romania. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 1490–1507.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1221335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faist, Thomas, Gerdes, J., & Rieple, B. (2007). Dual citizenship as a path-dependent process. In Alejandro Portes-Josh DeWind (eds.): Rethinking migration. New theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gagauz, O. (2016). (coord.). Population Situation Analysis in the Republic of Moldova (PSA 2016). http://moldova.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/PSA_engleza.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017.
  20. Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (Eds.). (2003). Reproducerea diferențelor de gen. Politici, sferă public și viață cotidiană în țările postsocialiste. Cluj-Napoca: EFES.Google Scholar
  21. Ghencea, B., & Gudumac, I. (2004). Labour migration and remittances in the Republic of Moldova (report). Chișinău: Moldova Microfinance Alliance. http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00002327/01/Raport_Migration_Remittances_2.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017
  22. Görlich, D., & Trebesch, C. (2008). Seasonal migration and networks—Evidence on Moldova’s labour exodus. Review of World Economics, 144(1), 107–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0139-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, G., Falkingham, J., & Evandrou, M. (2009). The impact of adult children’s migration on wellbeing in later life: Voices from Moldova. CRA discussion paper no. 0902 CRA DP/0902, University of Southampton, UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b4340f0b652dd000bbe/60432_Migrants_Moldova.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  24. Harpaz, Y. (2013). Rooted cosmopolitans: Israelis with a European passport – History, property, identity. International Migration Review, 47(1), 166–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harpaz, Y. (2015). Ancestry into opportunity: How global inequality drives demand for long-distance European Union citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(13), 2081.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1037258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hegarty, T. J. (2001). The politics of language in Moldova. In C. C. O’Reilly (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and the state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914187_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herrera Lima, F. (2001). Transnational families: Institutions of transnational social space. In L. Pries (Ed.), New transnational social spaces (pp. 77–93). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Horváth, I. (2011). Romania and Moldova, Migration mid-19th Century to Present, with Special Focus on Minorities Migration. Migraţia din România şi Republica Moldova de la mijlocul secolului XIX până în prezent, cu accent pe migraţia minorităţilor, Studii de atelier ISPMN, 40. Cluj-Napoca: Institute for Research in National Minorities.Google Scholar
  29. Horváth, I., & Anghel, R. G. (2009). Migration and its consequences for Romania. Südosteuropa, 57(4), 386–403.Google Scholar
  30. Hossu, I. E. (2018). Family cohesion “Diffuse family” practices and the transnational perspective, accepted for publication in Romanian Journal of Population Studies, 12(1)Google Scholar
  31. Ihrig, S. (2007). Discursul (ne)civic şi nemulţumirile exprimate în el – Conceptul ‘moldovenist’ şi cel ‘românist’ de naţiune şi cetăţean oglindit în manualele actuale de istorie şi în istoriografia Republicii Moldova (1991-2005). In M. Heintz (Ed.), Republica Moldova: Stat slab – Cetăţenie incertă. Studii despre Republica Moldova (pp. 191–213). Curtea Veche: Bucharest.Google Scholar
  32. Iordachi, C. (2012a). Introducere: cetãțenia dublã și politicile naționale în Europa Centralã și de Est. In C. Iordachi (coord.), Redobândirea cetățeniei române: Perspective istorice, comparative și aplicate/Reacquiring Romanian Citizenship: Historical, Comparative and Applied Perspectives (13–66), (Bilingual ed.) Bucharest: Curtea Veche.Google Scholar
  33. Iordachi, C. (coord.) (2012b). Redobândirea cetățeniei române: Perspective istorice, comparative și aplicate/Reacquiring Romanian Citizenship: Historical, Comparative and Applied Perspectives, (Bilingual ed.) Bucharest: Curtea Veche.Google Scholar
  34. Iordachi, C. (2013). Country Report: Romania. EUDO Citizenship Observatory. Revised and updated April 2013. http://eudo-citizenship.eu/admin/?p=file&appl=countryProfiles&f=2013-19-Romania.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2017
  35. King, C. (1994). Moldovan identity and the politics of pan-Romanianism. Slavic Review, 53(2), 345–368.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2501297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, C. (1999). The Moldovans: Romania, Russia, and the politics of culture. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  37. Knott, E. (2015). What does it mean to be a kin majority? Analyzing Romanian identity in Moldova and Russian identity in Crimea from below. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 830–859.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knott, E. (2017). Strategy, identity or legitimacy? Analysing engagement with dual citizenship from the bottom-up. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321803919_Strategy_Identity_or_Legitimacy_Analysing_Engagement_with_Dual_Citizenship_from_the_Bottom-Up. Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
  39. Koser, K., & Lutz, H. (1998). The new migration in Europe: Contexts, constructions and realities. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leccardi, C., & Feixa, C. (2012). Introduction. Youth in transition(s). In C. Leccardi, C. Feixa, S. Kovacheva, H. Reiter, & T. Sekulić (Eds.), 1989 – Young People and social change after the fall of the Berlin Wall (pp. 5–13). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Lücke, M., Omar Mahmoud, T., & Pinger, P. (2007). Patterns and Trends of Migration and Remittances in Moldova, prepared for International Organization for Migration (IOM).Google Scholar
  42. Lücke, M., Omar Mahmoud, T., & Steinmayr, A. (2009). Labor Migration and Remittances in Moldova: Is the Boom Over?” Trends and preliminary findings from the IOM-CBSAXA panel household survey 2006–2008, prepared for International Organization for Migration (IOM).Google Scholar
  43. Marcu, S. (2014). Between migration and cross-border mobility: Return for development and Europeanization among Moldavian immigrants. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 14(1), 83–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2014.882086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mosneaga, V. (2014). Republic of Moldova: Diaspora and diaspora policy. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 14(2), 149–172.  https://doi.org/10.2478/sjps-2014-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pinger, P. (2010). Come back or stay? Spend Here or there? Return and remittances: The case of Moldova. International Migration, 48, 142–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00562.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruggiero, E. (2005). Migration and remittances. Problems of Economic Transition, 48(3), 54–83.Google Scholar
  48. Siegel, M., & Lücke, M. (2013). Migrant transnationalism and the choice of transfer channels for remittances: The case of Moldova. Global Networks, 13, 120–141.  https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Toderiţă, A., Silaghi, C., & Ghinea, C. (2012). Redobândirea cetățeniei românești: cine, când, cum, unde și de ce? In Redobândirea cetățeniei române: Perspective istorice, comparative și aplicate/Reacquiring Romanian Citizenship: Historical, Comparative and Applied Perspectives, (Bilingual ed.) Bucharest: Curtea Veche.Google Scholar
  50. Vullnetari, J., & King, R. (2008). ‘Does your granny eat grass?’ On mass migration, care drain and the fate of older people in rural Albania. Global Networks, 8(2), 139–171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2008.00189.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iulia-Elena Hossu
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Population Studies, Babeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations