Advertisement

Older Parents in Romania as a Resource for their Migrant Adult Children

  • Mihaela HărăgușEmail author
  • Ionuț Földes
  • Veronica Savu
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 15)

Abstract

We investigate the flows of downward solidarity, from older parents living in Romania to their migrant adult children. In our approach we combine the solidarity paradigm with specificities brought by literature which address issues of geographical distance, mobility, and transnationalism. We investigate how opportunities and needs of both parents and migrant adult children, their family structure and contextual factors influence the provision of direct support in situations of copresence or from a distance. We focus on older parents in home country and work with the data collected through a national survey of persons aged 60 and over with at least one child abroad. Our results show that parents’ good health and younger age are indispensable for provision of support to their migrant children, especially when it involves travelling abroad. The family structures of both generations and the accessibility of the migration country for visits are also important factors.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-1377.

References

  1. Albertini, M., Kohli, M., & Vogel, C. (2007). Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: Common patterns – Different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anghel, R. G. (2009). Schimbare socială sau dezvoltare? Studiu de caz într-un oraș din România. In R. G. Anghel & I. Horvath (Eds.), Sociologia Migrației. Teorii și studii de caz românești (pp. 249–267). Polirom: Iași.Google Scholar
  3. Baldassar, L. (2007). Transnational families and aged care: The mobility of care and the Migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(2), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldassar, L. (2014). Too sick to move: Distant ‘crisis’ care in transnational families. International Review of Sociology, 24(3), 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014). Locating transnational care circulation in migration and family studies. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 25–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Baldassar, L., Baldock, C. V., & Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders. Migration, ageing and transnational caregiving. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldock, C. V. (2003). Long-distance migrants and family support: A Dutch case study, health. Sociology Review, 12(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  8. Bawin-Legros, B., & Stassen, J. F. (2002). Intergenerational solidarity: Between the family and the state. Current Sociology, 50, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, E. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 856–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengtson, V. L., & Schrader, S. S. (1982). Parent-child relations. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology (pp. 115–128). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bianchi, S. M., Hotz, V. J., McGarry, K., & Seltzer, J. A. (2006, October 4–5). Intergenerational ties: Alternative theories, empirical findings and trends, and remaining challenges. Paper presented at Penn State symposium on family issues, “Caring and exchange within and across generations”, State College.Google Scholar
  13. Bordone, V., & de Valk, H. A. G. (2016). Intergenerational support among migrant families in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 13(3), 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). Transnational families in the twenty-first century. In D. Bryceson & U. Vuorela (Eds.), The transnational family. New European Frontiers and global networks (pp. 3–30). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  15. Culic, I. (2010). State of imagination: Embodiments if immigration in Canada. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finch, J. (1989). Family obligations and social change. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. Tavistock: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Földes, I. (2016). Elderly parents, adult children and the Romanian transnational family: An intergenerational solidarity approach. Studia Universitas Sociologia, 61(1), 77–106.Google Scholar
  21. Hărăguș, M., & Telegdi-Csetri Ducu, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity in Romanian transnational families. In I. C. Crespi, S. Meda, & L. Merla (Eds.), Making multicultural families in Europe: Gender and generational relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Kilkey, M., & Merla, L. (2014). Situating transnational families care-giving arrangements: The role of institutional contexts. Global Networks, 14(2), 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leibfried, S. (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community. In Z. Ferge & J. E. Kolberg (Eds.), Social policy in a changing Europe (pp. 245–279). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  24. Mangen, D., Bengtson, V., & Landry, P. (1988). Measuring of intergenerational relations. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Merla, L. (2015). Salvadoran migrants in Australia: An analysis of transnational families’ capability to care across borders. International Migration, 53(6), 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nedelcu, M. (2017). Transnational grandparenting in the digital age: Mediated co-presence and childcare in the case of Romanian migrants in Switzerland and Canada. European Journal of Ageing, 14(15), 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nedelcu, M., & Wyss, M. (2016). ‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary c-presence: Transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks, 16(2), 202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandu, D. (2005). Emerging transnational migration from Romanian villages. Current Sociology, 53(4), 555–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh, S. (1997). Marriage money: The social shaping of money in marriage and banking. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  30. Singh, S., & Bhandari, M. (2012). Money management and control in the Indian joint family across generations. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh, S., & Cabraal, A. (2014). Boomerang remittances’ and circular care among Indian transnational families in Australia. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 220–234). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Szydlik, M. (2008). Intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39(1), 97–114.Google Scholar
  33. Szydlik, M. (2016). Sharing lives. Adult children and parents. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Thorogood, N. (1987). Race, class and gender: The politics of housework. In J. Brannen & G. Wilson (Eds.), Give and take in families (pp. 18–41). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Toth, G. (2009). Remiterile de bani ale migranților romi din regiunea Madrid și paternurile de utilizare a acestora. In D. Sandu (Ed.), Comunități românești în Spania (pp. 129–141). București: Fundația Soros Romania.Google Scholar
  36. Wall, K., & Bolzman, C. (2014). Mapping the new plurality of transnational families: A life course perspective. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 61–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. World Bank. (2016). Migration and remittances. Factbook 2016. (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
  39. Zimmer, Z., Rada, C., & Stoica, C. A. (2014). Migration, location and provision of support to older parents: The case of Romania. Population Ageing, 7, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaela Hărăguș
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ionuț Földes
    • 1
  • Veronica Savu
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Population Studies, Babeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations