How Is It Done? Metaphors for Constructing Identities

  • Alistair Ross
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)


Many young Europeans now seem to construct their wider political identities in the way that Anderson once described national identities (1991): as imagined communities. Young people, who have grown up post-Cold War, in a more diverse society than their parents, who are digital social media natives, are consequently less nationalistic, more accepting of diversity, and shift between multiple identities flexibly and contingently. They are not ‘citizens of anywhere’ (Goodhart 2017), but capable of feeling attachment to local, national, European and global identities. Many have a strong sense of communal values, but seek to change and extend rights in these areas. The chapter concludes with some suggestions for how schools, states and the European Union might respond to these findings.


  1. Anderson, Benedict. 1991 (revised edition). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Balescu, Oana. 2009. “Reflections on European Identity: The Case of East European Countries.” In European Citizenship – In the Process of Construction – Challenges for Citizenship, Citizenship Education and Democratic Practice in Europe, edited by Ditta Dolejšiová and Miguel Angel Garcia López, 44–54. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, Keith and Linda Levstik. 1996. “‘Back When God Was Around and Everything’: Elementary Children’s Understanding of Historical Time.” American Educational Research Journal 33 (2): 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2004. Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bhabha, Homi. 1990. “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Narration.” In Nation and Narration, edited by Homi Bhabha, 291–322. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, Norman. 2011. Vanished Kingdoms: The History of Half-Forgotten Europe. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Dirks, Nicholas. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eurostat. 2018a. Internet Access and Use Statistics – Households and Individuals. Luxembourg: European Commission, Eurostat.
  10. Eurostat. 2018b. Being Young in Europe Today – Digital World. Luxembourg: European Commission, Eurostat.
  11. Freire, Paulo. 2014. Pedagogy of Commitment. Translated by David Brookshire and Alexandre Oliveira. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  12. Goodhart, David. 2017. The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  13. Harnett, Penelope. 2007. “Teaching Emotive and Controversial History to 3–7 Year Olds: A Report for The Historical Association.” International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research 7 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  14. Internet Systems Consortium. 2012. Internet Hosts Count History. Archived at
  15. Leighton, Ralph. 2014. Teaching Citizenship Educaton: A Radical Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. “Indirect Rule, Civil Society, and Ethnicity: The African Dilemma.” Social Justice, 23 (1/2): 145–150.Google Scholar
  17. Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2014. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Translated by Patrick Camiller. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Picketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pinker, Steven. 2018. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  20. Pöllmann, Andreas. 2010. “Locating Ancestry in Notions of Britishness/Germanness: Beyond Waning Myths of Civic and Ethnic Nations.” Sage Open October-December 2012, 1–6.Google Scholar
  21. Quintelier, Ellen. 2007. “Differences in Political Participation Between Young and Old People.” Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 165–180.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, Alistair. 2015. Understanding the Constructions of Identities by Young New Europeans: Kaleidoscopic Selves. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Siklodi, Nora. 2018. “Defining Contemporary European Identity/ies.” In The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbourhood: Europeanisations and Its Twenty-First Century Contradictions, edited by Paul Flenley and Michael Mannin, 25–37. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Starmans, Christina, Mark Sheskin and Paul Bloom. 2017. “Why People Prefer Unequal Societies.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (0082): 1–7.Google Scholar
  26. Wilkinson, Richard and Kate Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  27. Wilkinson, Richard and Kate Pickett. 2018. The Inner Level: How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone’s Wellbeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, Jon. 2016. India Conquered: Britain’s Raj and the Chaos of Empire. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alistair Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.London Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations