On Economic Methodology Literature from 1963 to Today

  • Lawrence BolandEmail author


Until the late 1970s, it was difficult publishing economic methodology research in any mainstream economics journal. Today there are at least two journals devoted to articles about economic methodology. However, it is important to keep in mind that there are two types of economic methodology. There is what has been called small-m methodology which is about the assumptions made by economic model builders, and there is big-M methodology which is about matters of interest to philosophers but not to economists. The recent history of economic methodology literature and conferences has displayed the hijacking of economic methodology research by philosophers with the result that those of us who wish to do research on small-m methodology are back where we were in the 1960s and 1970s.


  1. Backhouse, R. 2010. Methodology in Action. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boland, L. 1979. A Critique of Friedman’s Critics. Journal of Economic Literature 17: 503–522.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1989. Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology After Samuelson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1990–1992. Understanding the Popperian Legacy in Economics. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 7: 273–284.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. Towards a Useful Methodology Discipline. Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2010. Mäki on ‘Friedman 1953’. Economics and Philosophy 26: 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2016. Philosophy of Economics Versus Methodology of Economics. Sudia Metodologiczne 36: 17–26.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, John B. 2007. The Turn in Economics and the Turn in Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drakopoulos, Stavros. 2016. Economic Crisis, Economic Methodology and the Scientific Ideal of Physics. The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues X: 28–57.Google Scholar
  11. Düppe, Till. 2011. How Economic Methodology Became a Separate Science. Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (2): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyke, Charles E. 2012. Philosophy of Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Frey, B. 2001. Why Economists Disregard Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, M. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hands, D. Wade. 2001. Economic Methodology Is Dead – Long Live Economic Methodology: Thirteen Theses on the New Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hausman, D.M. 2001. A New Era for Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1): 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawson, T. 1994. Why Are So Many Economists Opposed to Methodology? Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1): 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mäki, Uskali. 2012. Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: North Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, Don. 2014. Philosophy of Economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samuelson, Paul. 1965 [1947]. Foundations of Economic Analysis. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  21. Wong, S. 1973. The ‘F-Twist’ and the Methodology of Paul Samuelson. American Economic Review 63: 312–325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations