Advertisement

Postoperative Management (Routine and Complex Situations)

  • Shirin TowfighEmail author
  • Desmond T. K. Huynh
Chapter

Abstract

Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for incisional hernias have unique aspects to them as compared to open repair techniques. These are related to the use of trocars and cannulas, manipulation of the abdominal wall, handling of the hernia contents, and mesh placement. In this chapter, we will discuss postoperative management that is unique to these two approaches to incisional hernia repairs based on these factors. They include management of postoperative pain. We also review notable complications, including trocar site hernias, intestinal injury, and seromas. Differences between the two techniques are highlighted. We include expert tips and insight into the various intraoperative decisions that can be made to reduce the postoperative complications.

Keywords

Robotic Incisional hernia Postoperative management ERAS Enhanced recovery Seroma Postoperative pain Ileus Port-site hernia Trocar Cannula Suture hernia Intestinal injury 

References

  1. 1.
    Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4S–2):151S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Earle D, Roth JS, Saber A, Haggerty S, Bradley JF, Fanelli R, et al. SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M. Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg. 2004;139(11):1248–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips E, Santos D, Towfigh S. Working port site hernias: to close or not to close? Does it matter in the obese? Bariatric Times. 2011;8(6):24–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comfort AL, Frey MK, Musselman K, Chern JY, Lee J, Joo L, et al. Predictors of port site hernia necessitating operative intervention in patients undergoing robotic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145:176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Picod G, Jambon AC, Vinatier D, et al. What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2005;19(1):95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S. The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2003;13(4):279–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khansa I, Koogler A, Richards J, Bryant R, Janis JE. Pain management in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(6):e1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muysoms FE, Cathenis KKJ, Claeys DAB. “Suture hernia”: identification of a new type of hernia presenting as a recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2007;11(2):199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leitao MM, Malhotra V, Briscoe G, Suidan R, Dholakiya P, Santos K, et al. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3561–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonzalez A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M, et al. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1342–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bittner JG, Alrefai S, Vy M, Mabe M, Prado PARD, Clingempeel NL. Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2017;20:1–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warren JA, Cobb WS, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM. Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin-del-Campo LA, Weltz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW. Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc. 2017;21:1–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prabhu AS, Dickens EO, Copper CM, Mann JW, Yunis JP, Phillips S, et al. Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(2):285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armijo P, Pratap A, Wang Y, Shostrom V, Oleynikov D. Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review. Surg Endosc. 2017;19:1–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—part 1). Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):2–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guend H, Widmar M, Patel S, Nash GM, Paty PB, Guillem JG, et al. Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2820–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Picerno T, Sloan NL, Escobar P, Ramirez PT. Bowel injury in robotic gynecologic surgery: risk factors and management options. A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alemzadeh H, Raman J, Leveson N, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK. Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA data. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F. Long-term recurrence and complications associated with elective incisional hernia repair. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1575–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beverly Hills Hernia CenterBeverly HillsUSA
  2. 2.Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations