Advertisement

Industrial Districts/Clusters and Smart Specialisation Policies

  • Fiorenza Belussi
  • Michaela Trippl
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Industrial districts and clusters are of utmost importance for economic growth and innovation in the European Union (EU). In this chapter, we analyse how smart specialisation policies have worked in different region types, combining cluster policies with smart specialisation ideas. Our study selects a sample of EU regions that differs strongly in terms of geography, size, socioeconomic dynamics, innovation capacities, and governance settings. Two key components of the strategy development phase deserved particular attention, that is, stakeholder inclusion and policy prioritisation. The cases selected are grouped into three main region types: advanced, intermediate, and less-developed regions. The empirical results suggest that advanced regions are in the best position to develop inclusive governance forms and to benefit from smart specialisation strategies. Intermediate regions also perform quite well with respect to the development of smart specialisation strategies, coping with stakeholder involvement, planning capabilities, and the capacity to prioritise a set of clusters and sectors. In contrast, in less-developed regions, weak innovation systems, insufficient experience with regionalised innovation policies, and high levels of state centralisation have undermined smart specialisation processes.

Keywords

Cluster industrial policies Path dependent growth New path creation Smart policies Industrial districts Clusters 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Professor Dr. Fiorenza Belussi and Michaela Trippl have received financial support from an EU research project funded under the FP7 grant number 320131, SMARTSPEC.

References

  1. Amin, A., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Learning, proximity and industrial performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU regional competitiveness index. Luxembourg, Europe.Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B. (1996). Industrial districts as learning regions: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(2), 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011a). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asheim, B., Lawton Smith, H., & Oughton, C. (2011b). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aznar-Sanchez, J., Carretero-Gómez, A., & Belmonte-Ureňa, L. (2017). Multinational corporations and cluster evolution: The case of Cosentino in the Spanish marble cluster. In F. Belussi & J. Hervás-Oliver (Eds.), Unfolding cluster evolution. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bair, J., & Gereffi, G. (2001). Local clusters in global chains: The causes and consequences of export dynamism in Torreon’s blue jeans industry. World Development, 29, 1885–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. An independent report prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Bathelt, H., & Henn, S. (2014). The geographies of knowledge transfers over distance: Toward a typology. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1403–1424.Google Scholar
  12. Bathelt, I. H., Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian district as a socioeconomic notion. In F. Pyke & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  14. Becattini, G., & Rullani, E. (1996). Local systems and global connections: The role of knowledge. In F. Pyke & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Local and regional response to global pressure. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  15. Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., & De Propris, L. (2009). A handbook of industrial districts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Belussi, F. (1996). Local systems, industrial districts and institutional networks: Towards a new evolutionary paradigm of industrial economics? European Planning Studies, 4(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Belussi, F. (2000). Tacchi a spillo: il distretto calzaturiero della Riviera del Brenta come forma organizzata di capitale sociale. Padova: Cleup.Google Scholar
  18. Belussi, F. (2006). In search of a theory of spatial clustering: Agglomeration vs active clustering. In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters in regional development (pp. 69–89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Belussi, F. (2010). The evolution of a technologically dynamic district: The case of Montebelluna. In F. Belussi & A. Sammarra (Eds.), Business networks in clusters and industrial districts. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Belussi, F. (2015). The international resilience of Italian industrial districts/clusters (ID/C) between knowledge re-shoring and manufacturing off (near)-shoring. Investigaciones Regionales, 32, 89.Google Scholar
  21. Belussi, F., & Caldari, K. (2011). The Lancashire industrial district: Its rise, prosperity and decline in the analysis of British economists. In T. Raffaelli, T. Nishizawa, & S. Cook (Eds.), Marshall, Marshallians and industrial economics (pp. 62–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Belussi, F., & Caloffi, A. (2018). The role of leading firms in explaining evolutionary paths of growth: Italian and Turkish clusters on the move. In F. Belussi & J.-L. Hervas-Oliver (Eds.), Cluster advantage and firm performance. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Belussi, F., & Gottardi, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evolutionary patterns of local industrial systems. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Belussi, F., & Pilotti, L. (2002). The development of an explorative analytical model of knowledge creation, learning and innovation within the Italian industrial districts. Geografiska Annaler, 84, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bergman, E. M. (2007). Cluster life-cycles: An emerging synthesis. SRE – Discussion Papers, 2007/04. Institut für Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.Google Scholar
  27. Borrás, S., & Tsagdis, D. (Eds.). (2008). Cluster policies in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Boschma, R. (2007). Path creation, path dependence and regional development. Path dependence and the evolution of city regional economies, Working Paper Series, Vol. 197, pp. 40–55.Google Scholar
  29. Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness related variety and economic geography. In O. Cooke (Ed.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Boschma, R. A., & Ter Wal, A. L. (2007). Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 177–199.Google Scholar
  32. Brenner, T. (2004). Local industrial clusters: Existence, emergence and evolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Brenner, T., & Schlump, C. (2011). Policy measures and their effects in the different phases of the cluster life cycle. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1363–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialisation strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24, 1393–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M. & Herstad, S. (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16646583.
  38. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cooke, P. (2004). Regional innovation systems – An evolutionary approach. In P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H.-J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Cooke, P. (2016). Four minutes to four years: The advantage of recombinant over specialized innovation – RIS3 versus ‘smartspec’. European Planning Studies, 24, 1494–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Crespo, J. (2011). How emergence conditions of technological clusters affect their viability? Theoretical perspectives on cluster life cycles. European Planning Studies, 19(12), 2025–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dalum, B., Pederson, O. R., & Villumsen, G. (2005). Technological life-cycles: Lessons from a cluster facing disruption. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. De Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., & Gereffi, G. (2017). Local clusters in global value chains: Linking actors and territories through manufacturing and innovation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. De Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., & Gereffi, G. (Eds.). (2018). Local clusters in global value chains: Linking actors and territories through manufacturing and innovation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. L. (2006). The importance of cluster for spillover from FDI and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dicken, P. (2003). Globalizing regional development. A global production network perspective. GPN working paper 3. May 2003. Manchester University.Google Scholar
  47. Engel, J. S. (2015). Global clusters of innovation: Lessons from silicon valley. California Management Review, 57, 36–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Estensoro, M., & Larrea, M. (2016). Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: Engaging subregional governments. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. European Comission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS3), Brussels.Google Scholar
  50. European Commission. (2014a, March). National/regional innovation strategies for smart specialisation. Cohesion Policy Fact Sheet. DG Regio, Brussels.Google Scholar
  51. European Commission. (2014b). Regional innovation scoreboard 2014. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  52. Feldman, M. P., & Braunerhjelm, P. (Eds.). (2006). Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Foray, D. (2014a). From smart specialization to smart specialization policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Foray, D. (2014b). Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Gertler, M. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Glasmeier, A. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gordon, I., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37(3), 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Guerrieri, P., & Pietrobelli, C. (2004). Industrial districts evolution and technological regimes. Technovation, 24, 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hassink, R. (2010). 21 Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, p. 450.Google Scholar
  60. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hervas Oliver, J. L., Garrigos, J. A., & Porta, J. I. D. (2008). External ties and the reduction of knowledge asymmetries among clusters within global value chains: The case of the ceramic tile district of Castellon. European Planning Studies, 16(4), 507–520.Google Scholar
  62. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Lleo, M., & Cervello, R. (2017). The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. Research Policy, 46(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions. Scienze Regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Isaksen, A., & Nilsson, M. (2013). Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1919–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: McMillan. (Reprinted in 1982).Google Scholar
  70. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
  71. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 64(4), 395–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Martin, P., & Sunley, P. (2011). Conceptualising cluster evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies, 45(10), 1299–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Maskell, P., & Kebir, L. (2006). The theory of the cluster theory- what it takes and what it implies. In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1407–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles- dimension and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Molina-Morales, X. (2001). European industrial districts: Influence of geographic concentration on performance. Journal of International Management, 34, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Molina-Morales, F. X. (2002). Industrial districts and innovation: The case of the Spanish ceramic tiles industry. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 317–335.Google Scholar
  78. Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2015). Policy learning and smart specialisation: Balancing policy change and policy stability for new regional industrial path development. Papers in Innovation Studies, No. 2015/39, CIRCLE, Lund University.Google Scholar
  79. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morgan, K. (2013). Path dependence and the state. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development (pp. 318–340). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Morgan, K. (2016a). Collective entrepreneurship: The Basque model of innovation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1544–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Morgan, K. (2016b). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 569–583.Google Scholar
  83. Nachum, L., & Keeble, D. (2003). Neo-Marshallian clusters and global networks: The linkages of media firms in Central London. Long Range Planning, 36(5), 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nadvi, K., & Halder, G. (2005). Local clusters in global value chains: Exploring dynamic linkages between Germany and Pakistan. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(5), 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. OECD. (1999). Boosting innovation: The cluster approach. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  86. Østergaard, C. R., & Park, E. (2015). What makes clusters decline? A study on disruption and evolution of a high-tech cluster in Denmark. Regional Studies, 49(5), 834–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Paniccia, I. (2002). Industrial districts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  88. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantages of nations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Porter, M. (1998). On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  90. Pouder, R., & St. Johon, C. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovations. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 673–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, G., Morrison, A., & Troncoso-Ojeda, R. (2017). On the emergence and evolution of clusters. In F. Belussi & J. Hervas-Oliver (Eds.), Unfolding cluster evolution. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Roelandt, & den Hertog. (1999). Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making: The state of art. In OECD (Ed.), Boosting innovation: The cluster approach. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  94. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional networks: Industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Sedita, M. R., Caloffi, A., & Belussi, F. (2013). Heterogeneity of MNEs entry modes in industrial clusters: An evolutionary approach based on the cluster life cycle model, Druid Conference, Barcellona.Google Scholar
  96. Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tappi, D. (2005). Clusters, adaptation and extroversion: A cognitive and entrepreneurial analysis of the Marche music cluster. European Urban and Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452.Google Scholar
  99. Ter Wal, A. L., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development (pp. 297–317). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Torre, A., & Wallet, F. (2013). Innovation and the governance of rural territories. In E. Coudel et al. (Eds.), Regional innovation systems in agriculture and food: How to go towards more sustainability. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  103. Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2015a). External “energy” for regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. CIRCLE Working Paper No. 2015/47, CIRCLE, Lund University.Google Scholar
  104. Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., Isaksen, A., & Sinozic, T. (2015b). Perspectives on cluster evolution: Critical review and future research issues. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2028–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., Healy, A., & Marques, P. (2016). Final report: Smart specialisation for regional innovation (7th Framework Programme). Work Package 5, Deliverable 5.2, CIRCLE, Lund University.Google Scholar
  106. Wang, L., Madhok, A., & Xiao Li, S. (2014). Agglomeration and clustering over the industry life cycle: Towards a dynamic model of geographic concentration. Strategic Management Journal, 995–1012.Google Scholar
  107. Weil, T. (2012). Silicon velley stories. In F. Belussi & U. Staber (Eds.), Managing networks of creativity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. S. (2004). Clusters from the inside and out: Local dynamics and global linkages. Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 1071–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wolman, H., & Hincapie, D. (2010). Clusters and cluster-based development: A literature review and policy discussion. George Washington Institute of Public Policy (GWIPP), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  110. Zucchella, A. (2006). Local cluster dynamics: Trajectories of mature industrial districts between decline and multiple embeddedness. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Padua UniversityPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Vienna UniversityWienAustria

Personalised recommendations