Advertisement

Italian Industrial Districts and the 2008 Recession

  • Giorgio Brunello
  • Monica Langella
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Using a “difference-in-differences” approach, we show that the share of entrepreneurs in Italy declined more in industrial districts than in comparable labour markets during the 3 years following the 2008 recession. We have examined alternative explanations of this finding, thus concluding that it is consistent with the idea that intense social interactions typical of industrial districts act as a multiplier that amplifies the response to shocks. However, we cannot exclude that this may translate into a positive effect on employment as the flows from entrepreneurship to employment appear to be greater within industrial districts.

Keywords

Industrial districts 2008 Recession Italy 

References

  1. Ammermuller, A. (2010). Wage flexibility in regional labour markets: Evidence from Italy and German. Regional Studies, 44(4), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andini, M., De Blasio, G., Duranton, G., & Strange, W. (2012). Marshallian labour market pooling: Evidence from Italy, Temi di Discussione Banca d’Italia, n.922, Rome.Google Scholar
  3. Cingano, F., & Schivardi, F. (2004). Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4), 720–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Amuri, F. (2010). The impact of the great recession on the Italian labour market. Mimeo, Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
  5. De Blasio, G., & Di Addario, S. (2005). Do workers benefit from industrial agglomeration? Journal of Regional Science, 45(4), 797–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Caju, P., Gautier, E., Momferatu, D., & Ward-Warmedinger, M. (2009). Institutional features of wage bargaining in 23 European Countries, the US and Japan. Ekonomia, 12(2), 57–108.Google Scholar
  7. Faggio, G., & Silva, O. (2014). Self-employment and entrepreneurship in urban and rural labour markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 84, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairlie, R. W. (2013). Entrepreneurship, economic conditions, and the great recession. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(2), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaeser, E. L., Sacerdote, B. I., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2003). The social multiplier. Journal of the European Economic Association, 345–353.Google Scholar
  11. Guiso, L., & Schivardi, F. (2007). Spillovers in industrial districts. The Economic Journal, 117(516), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guiso, L., & Schivardi, F. (2011). What determines entrepreneurial clusters? Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(1), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004a). Does local financial development matter? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 929–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004b). The role of social capital in financial development. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(9), 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Puga, D. (2010). The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2003). Geography, industrial organization and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sianesi, B. (2005). Propensity score matching. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies/Mimeo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Padova, Cesifo, IZA and ROAPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Centre for Economic PerformanceThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations