Advertisement

Biological Sample Collection in the Era of Genomic Medicine: A New Example of a Public Commons?

  • Christine Noiville
  • Florence Bellivier
Chapter

Abstract

The model of the commons appears theoretically relevant for thinking, not so much about health in general—health as an international public good has been the subject of numerous studies—but about the governance of the health tool that biobanks constitute, especially as we enter the era of genomic medicine. Nonetheless, the governance of biobanks, as transformed by genomic medicine, will have to meet some conditions in actual practice to constitute a true commons.

References

  1. Bellivier, F. (2017). Biobanques. In M. Cornu et al. (Dir), Dictionnaire des biens communs (pp 127 et seq). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  2. Bellivier, F., Benhamou, F., Cornu, M., & Noiville, C. (2015). Collections muséales et collections biologiques : de la conservation à l’accès? In B. Coriat (Ed.), Le retour des communs. La crise de l’idéologie propriétaire, propriétaire (pp. 197 et seq). Paris: Editions Les liens qui libèrent.Google Scholar
  3. Bellivier, F., & Noiville, C. (2009). Les biobanques, Que Sais-Je ?, PUF, 2009 and La bioéquité. Batailles autour du partage du vivant, Autrement, Coll. Frontières.Google Scholar
  4. Bellivier, F., & Noiville, C. (2018). Les collections d'échantillons biologiques à l'heure de la médecine génomique: un nouvel exemple de bien commun? In X. Bioy (Dir), La régulation publique des centres de ressources biologiques. Le cas des tumorothèques (pp 391 et seq). Les Etudes hospitalières.Google Scholar
  5. Boldin, B. (2015). Economie de la santé comme bien public mondial. Revue de la régulation [Online], 17 | 1st semester, Spring 2015, posted June 17, 2015 at http://regulation.revues.org/11128
  6. Chamayou, G. (2008). Les corps vils. Expérimenter sur les êtres humains aux XVIIIème et XIXème siècles. La découverte.Google Scholar
  7. Cornu, M., Orsi, F., & Rochfeld, J. (Eds.). (2017). Dictionnaire des biens communs, PUF, collection Quadrige.Google Scholar
  8. Heiborn, T. (2017). Stacking data. The Science Magazine of the Max Planck Society, 2, 27 et seq. https://www.mpg.de/11357066/MPR_2017_2.pdf
  9. Lenk, C., Sándor, J., & Gordijn, B. (2011). Biobanks and tissue research. The public, the patient and the regulation. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Mills, P. (2016). For whom the bell tolls: Precision medicine, private virtue and the public good. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/blog/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-precision-medicine-private
  11. Schröder T. (2017). Treasure hunt in the data jungle. The Science Magazine of the Max Planck Society, 2, p. 34 et seq. https://www.mpg.de/11357066/MPR_2017_2.pdf
  12. Washetin, K., Ilié, M., Hofman, V., Butori, C., Long, E., Lassalle, S., et al. (2017). Les biobanques : quels enjeux en 2017 ? Revue francophone des laboratoires, 2017(488), 25–29. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1773035X16304166?via%3Dihub.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Noiville
    • 1
  • Florence Bellivier
    • 2
  1. 1.French National Center for Scientific Research, UMR 8103ParisFrance
  2. 2.University of Paris NanterreParisFrance

Personalised recommendations