Advertisement

Paradox Lost pp 245-253 | Cite as

Concluding Remarks

  • Michael Huemer
Chapter

Abstract

The preceding paradoxes exhibit several kinds of problem that also beset human thinking in more ordinary cases. These include: hidden assumptions, neglect of the small, confusion, black-and-white thinking, oversimplification, inappropriate idealization, and inference from partial data. In solving paradoxes, we should not give up apparently self-evident principles, such as those of classical logic. The world is not inconsistent or incomprehensible. Human reason is fallible but correctable with effort.

References

  1. Gibbons-Neff, Thomas. 2016. “‘Fear of Muslims Is Rational’: What Trump’s New National Security Adviser Has Said Online”, Washington Post, November 18, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/11/18/trumps-new-national-security-adviser-has-said-some-incendiary-things-on-the-internet/, accessed June 3, 2017.
  2. Huemer, Michael. 2016. “Confessions of a Utopophobe”, Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (2016): 214–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kant, Immanuel. [1781] 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, tr. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Huemer
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations