Advertisement

Push the Envelope: An Alternative to Testing and the Teaching of Emily Dickinson’s Manuscripts

  • Jacqueline Jean Barrios
Chapter

Abstract

Beginning with the premise that the object in which a student encounters a poem is itself an instructor of reading, the paper began with an investigation of one of the most “encountered” Emily Dickinson poems in a scene of contemporary poetry reading: the AP English Literature classroom. The poem, “We grow accustomed to the night,” is ubiquitous in this context because it is one of two paired poems in an AP English Literature Exam published by the College Board. The paper proposes that poetry pedagogy should challenge contemporary student readers of poems to investigate other spaces the poem can occupy, rendering students as producers of alternate relationships to Emily Dickinson’s language beyond those made possible to them by the examiners of College Board. Turning to Dickinson manuscript scholarship on fragments and repurposed materials, this paper responds to desire for newer instructions for poetry reading, imagining a dis-assembling and subtractive pedagogy that seeks to uncover and unravel in order to restore the animus to create and make.

References

  1. Best, Sharon, and Sharon Marcus. 2009. Surface Reading: An Introduction. Representations 108 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, Sharon. 1992. Choosing Not Choosing: Dickinson’s Fascicles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Michael C. 2014. Alienating Language: A Poet’s Masque. Emily Dickinson Journal 23 (1): 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. College Board. 2017a. AP English Literature and Composition 2004 Free-Response Questions. College Board. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/apc/ap04_frq_english_lit_36149.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2017.
  5. ———. 2017b. AP English Literature and Composition Course Description. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-english-literature-and-composition-course-description.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2017.
  6. Gallop, Jane. 2007. The Historicization of Literary Studies and the Fate of Close Reading. Profession 2007 1: 181–186.Google Scholar
  7. Hart, Ellen Louise, and Martha Nell Smith, eds. 1998. Open Me Carefully: Emily Dickinson’s Intimate Letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson. Ashfield, MA: Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Heginbotham, Eleanor. 2003. Reading the Fascicles of Emily Dickinson: Dwelling in Possibilities. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lawrence, Danny. 2008. Writing the Free-Response Comparison/Contrast Poetry Essay. Profession Development AP English Literature and Composition Special Focus: Writing about Literature. College Board. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-sf-englit-writing-about-literature.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2017.
  10. Oberhaus, Dorothy. 1995. Emily Dickinson’s Fascicles: Method and Meaning. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Socarides, Alexandra. 2012. Dickinson Unbound: Paper, Process, Poetics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Werner, Marta. 1995. Emily Dickinson’s Open Folios: Scenes of Reading, Surfaces of Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  13. Werner, Marta, and Jen Bervin, eds. 2013. The Gorgeous Nothings. New York: Christine Burgin/New Directions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline Jean Barrios
    • 1
  1. 1.UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations