Advertisement

Capability Support for Entrepreneurial Ventures

  • Sergio EspañaEmail author
  • Hasan Koç
  • Marcela Ruiz
  • Óscar Pastor
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter presents the use of capability design for start-ups and entrepreneurial ventures. Newly started companies typically need to sharpen their business idea. The use of capability thinking in some pilot cases turned out to be a useful and beneficial approach. As a result, we distilled Capability-Driven Development and tuned it for start-up design, resulting in the LightCDD method. The method has evolved as we have applied it and learned from that experience. The chapter presents an updated version of the method, illustrating its results. It also discusses its perceived benefits and drawbacks. All in all, the results so far have shown that LightCDD helps in reducing the ambiguity of business plans and in identifying what contextual factors could affect the value proposition or the performance of the start-up.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grossmann, V.: Entrepreneurial innovation and economic growth. J. Macroecon. 31, 602–613 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., Christensen, C.: The innovator’s DNA. Harv. Bus. Rev. 87(12), 60–67 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tenessee: Startup Business Failure Rate by Industry. Entrepreneur Weekly, University of Tennessee (2017). http://www.statisticbrain.com/startup-failure-by-industry/
  4. 4.
    Hyytinen, A., Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P.: Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? J. Bus. Ventur. 30(4), 564–581 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fractl: Why Do Startups Fail? http://www.frac.tl/marketing-research/why-startups-fail-study/ (2016). Accessed Feb 2018
  6. 6.
    Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J.: The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J. Bus. Res. 58(6), 726–735 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koç, H., Ruiz, M., España, S.: LightCDD: a lightweight capability-driven development method for start-ups. In: 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design Based on the Notion of Capability, ASDENCA, International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. LNBIP, vol. 249, pp. 15–26 Springer, Heidelberg (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koç, H., Ruiz, M., España, S.: LightCDD: application of a capability-driven development method for start-ups development. Complex Syst. Inf. Model. Q. Issue 10 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S.: Meta-modeling for situational analysis and design methods. In: Syed, M.R., Syed, S.N. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Modern Systems Analysis and Design Technologies and Applications, pp. 35–54. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pastor, O., Molina, J.: Model-Driven Architecture in Practice: A Software Production Environment Based on Conceptual Modeling. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berzisa, S., Bravos, G., Cardona, T., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Juanes Pascual, R., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Valverde, F., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(1), 15–25 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0362-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Sandkuhl, K., Stamer, D., Stirna, J., Valverde, F., Zdravkovic, J.: Deliverable 5.3: The Final Version of Capability Driven Development Methodology. CaaS – Capability as a Service in Digital Enterprises, FP7 project 611351 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35862.34889
  14. 14.
    Voinov, A., Gaddis, E.: Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecol. Model. 216(2), 197–207 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Smith, A.: Business Model Generation. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maurya, A.: Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kurucz, E., Colbert, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Upward, A., Willard, B.: Relational leadership for strategic sustainability: practices and capabilities to advance the design and assessment of sustainable business models. J. Clean. Prod. 140(1), 189–204 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joyce, A., Paquin, R., Pigneur, Y.: The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1474–1486 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yeoman, R., Moskovitz, D.: Social lean canvas. http://socialleancanvas.com (2014). Accessed Aug 2017
  20. 20.
    Board of Innovation: Business Model Kit (2017). https://www.boardofinnovation.com/business-model-templates-tools/
  21. 21.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation v2.0. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF (2011). Accessed Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio España
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hasan Koç
    • 2
  • Marcela Ruiz
    • 1
  • Óscar Pastor
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of RostockRostockGermany
  3. 3.PROS CenterUniversitat Politèchnica de ValènciaValènciaSpain

Personalised recommendations