Methodological Challenges in Transnational Family Research

  • Viorela Ducu


Here we briefly present the research methodology, the results of which are the basis of this book, underlining the challenges of two groups of data collection and recording methods: video and online interviews, on the one hand, and interviews with couples, on the other.


Multisite research Video/online recording Couple interviews 


  1. Bailey, J. (2008). First Steps in Qualitative Data Analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice, 25, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjørnholt, M., & Farstad, G. R. (2014). ‘Am I rambling?’ On the Advantages of Interviewing Couples Together. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ducu, V. (2017). Online/Offline Couple Interviews in the Study of Transnational Families. Romanian Journal of Population Studies, XI(1), 107–120. Scholar
  5. Garcez, A., Duarte, R., & Eisenberg, Z. (2011). Production and Analysis of Video Recordings in Qualitative Research. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, 37(2), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hertz, R. (1995). Separate But Simultaneous Interviewing of Husbands and Wives: Making Sense of Their Stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(4), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Janghorban, R., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype Interviewing: The New Generation of Online Synchronous Interview in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9. Scholar
  8. Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 12. Scholar
  9. Mellor, R. M., Slaymaker, E., & Cleland, J. (2013). Recognizing and Overcoming Challenges of Couple Interview Research. Qualitative Health Research, 23(10), 1399–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing Visual Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Morgan, D. L., Ataie, J., Carder, P., & Hoffman, K. (2013). Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1276–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Norlyk, A., Haahr, A., & Hall, E. (2016). Interviewing with or Without the Partner Present? – An Underexposed Dilemma Between Ethics and Methodology in Nursing Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(4), 936–945. Scholar
  13. Polak, L., & Green, J. (2015). Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value. Qualitative Health Research, 26(12), 1638–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., Dumelow, C., Locock, L., & Ziebland, S. (2008). The Effect of Joint Interviewing on the Performance of Gender. Field Methods, 20(2), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sullivan, J. (2012). Skype: An Appropriate Method of Data Collection for Qualitative Interviews? The Hilltop Review, 6(1), 54–60.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, B., & de Vocht, H. (2011). Interviewing Separately or as Couples? Considerations of Authenticity of Method. Qualitative Health Research, 21(11), 1576–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viorela Ducu
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Population StudiesBabeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations