Advertisement

What Does the Cognitive Science of Religion Explain?

Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 4)

Abstract

Over the past 15 years or so, the number of empirical projects in the cognitive science of religion (CSR) has grown exponentially and so too has the amount of attention paid to the field, including questions about what the cognitive science of religion is, how it conceptualizes religion and what it explains. The aim of this chapter is to contribute to these discussions by outlining the main objectives of CSR and the assumptions underlying the field. In particular, CSR has often been criticized for not engaging in extensive debates about what religion is. In this chapter I focus extensively on how CSR scholars construe religion and why they have eschewed these definitional debates in favor of engaging in empirical research. In what follows, I discuss how CSR conceptualizes religion, and how this differs from other approaches. Next, I consider how this conceptualization of religion shapes how scholars study it. Finally, I consider the question of how CSR actually explains religion.

Keywords

Cognitive science of religion Explanation of religion Fractionation of religion Traditional study of religion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Release time to write this chapter was provided by the College of Humanities at California State University, Northridge. Thanks to Joseph Langston, Justin Barrett , Justin McBrayer, Mitch Hodge and Robert McCauley for reading and providing feedback on an earlier version of this chapter. Thanks also to Paul Parrett for proof reading and editing the first draft.

References

  1. Astuti, R. 2007. Ancestors and the afterlife. Quaderns de l’Institut Catalàd’Antropologia 23: 61–78.Google Scholar
  2. Astuti, R., and P.L. Harris. 2008. Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science 32: 713–740.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, Quentin D., and Harvey Whitehouse. 2011. The cultural Morphospace of ritual form: Examining modes of religiosity cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior 32: 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atran, Scott. 1998. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive Universala and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 547–569.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2002. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2010. Talking to the enemy: Faith, brotherhood, and the (un)making of terrorists. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Banerjee, K., and Paul Bloom. 2015. “Everything happens for a reason”: Children’s beliefs about purpose in life events. Child Development 86: 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2014. Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition 133: 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen, S. 1997. Mindblindness: An essay on Aautism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barrett, Justin L., and Rebekah A. Richert. 2003. Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s god concepts. Review of Religious Research 44: 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrett, Justin L. 2000. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2001. How ordinary cognition informs petitionary prayer. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2004. Why would anyone believe in god? Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2007a. Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass 1: 768–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2007b. Is the spell really broken? Biopsychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science 5: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2011. Cognitive science of religion: Looking back, looking forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barrett, Justin L., and Melanie A. Nyhof. 2001. Spreading non-natural concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1: 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Baumard, Nicolas, and Pascal Boyer. 2013. Explaining moral religions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bering, Jesse. 2002. Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2: 263–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bering, Jesse, and David F. Bjorklund. 2004. The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Developmental Psychology 40: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bering, Jesse, Carlos Hernandez Blasi, and David F. Bjorklund. 2005. The development of ‘afterlife’ beliefs in religiously and secularly schooled children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bering, Jesse M. 2006. The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 453–462.Google Scholar
  23. Bering, Jesse, J. Piazza, and G. Ingram. 2011. Princess Alice is watching you: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 109: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bloom, Paul. 2004. Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2009. Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. In The believing primate, ed. Michael Murray and Jeffrey Schloss, 118–127. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Boyer, Pascal. 1994. Cognitive constraints on cultural representations: Natural ontologies and religious ideas. In Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in culture and cognition, ed. L.A. Hirschfield and S. Gelman, 391–411. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2003. Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2013. Explaining religious concepts. Levi- Strauss the brilliant and problematic ancestor. In Mental culture, classical social theory and the cognitive science of religion, ed. Dimitri Xygalatas and W. M. McCorkle, 164–175. Durham:Acumen.Google Scholar
  29. Boyer, Pascal, and Pierre Liénard. 2006. Precaution systems and ritualized behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 635–641.Google Scholar
  30. Brüne, M., and U. Brüne-Cohrs. 2006. Theory of mind—evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 30: 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bulbulia, J., R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, and K. Wyman. 2008. The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  32. Cohen, E., E. Burdett, N. Knight, and Justin L. Barrett. 2011. Cross-cultural similarities and differences in person-body reasoning: Experimental evidence from the UK and Brazilian Amazon. Cognitive Science 35: 1285–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cohen, E., R. Mundry, and S. Kirschner. 2014. Religion, synchrony and cooperation. Religion, Brain & Behavior 4: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cohen, Emma. 2007. The mind possessed: The cognition of spirit possession in an Afro-Brazilian religious tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2008. ‘Out with religion’: A novel framing of the religion debate. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Cohen, Emma, and Justin L. Barrett. 2008. When minds migrate. Conceptualizing spirit possession. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dawes, Greg, and James Maclaurin. 2012. What is religion? In A new science of religion, ed. Greg Dawes and James Maclaurin, 11–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Dawkins, Richard. 2007. The God delusion. London: Black swanGoogle Scholar
  39. De Cruz, Helen. 2014. Cognitive science of religion and the study of theological concepts. Topoi 33: 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 2012. Religious concepts as structured imagination. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 23: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. 2015. A natural history of natural theology. In The cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Dennett, Daniel Clement. 2006. Breaking the spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Emmons, N.A., and Deborah Kelemen. 2014. The development of children’s prelife reasoning. Evidence from two cultures. Child Development 85: 1617–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans, E. Margaret. 2001. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 42: 217–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Evans, J.S.B. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fischer, Ronald, Dimitris Xygalatas, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Paul Reddish, Penny Tok, Ivana Konvalinka, and Joseph Bulbulia. 2014. The fire-walker’s high: Affect and physiological responses in an extreme collective ritual. PLoS One 9: e88355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Franke, J. 2014. Has the cognitive science of religion (re) defined ‘Religion’?. Feedback 22.Google Scholar
  48. Geertz, Armin W. 2015. Evolution of religious belief. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Gelman, S.A., and C.H. Legare. 2011. Concepts and folk theories. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gervais, Will, and Joseph Henrich. 2010. The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture 10: 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gervais, Will, Aijana K. Willard, Ara Norenzayan, and Joseph Henrich. 2011. The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion 41: 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Guthrie, Stewart Elliott. 1980. A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology 21: 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. 1993. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetic evolution of social behaviour II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Henrich, J., and R. McElreath. 2003. The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 12: 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Heywood, B.T., and Jesse M. Bering. 2014. “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit Bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain & Behavior 4: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Järnefelt, E., C.F. Canfield, and Deborah Kelemen. 2015. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults. Cognition 140: 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jensen, J. 2014. What is religion? Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  59. Johnson, Dominic, and Jesse Bering. 2006. 'Hand of god, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology 4: 147470490600400119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnson, Dominic D.P. 2005. God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature 16: 410–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jong, Jonathan. 2012. Explaining religion (Away?) theism and the cognitive science of religion. Sophia 52: 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kahneman, Daniel. 2012. Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  63. Kelemen, Deborah. 2004. Are children “intuitive theists”?: Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science 15: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kelemen, Deborah, and C. DiYanni. 2005. Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development 6: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Knight, N. 2008. Yukatek Maya children’s attributions of belief to natural and non-natural entities. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8: 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lanman, Jonathan. 2012. On the non-evolution of atheism and the importance of definitions and data. Religion, Brain & Behavior 2: 76–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lanman, Jonathan A., and Michael D. Buhrmester. 2016. Religious actions speak louder than words: Exposure to credibility-enhancing displays predicts theism. Religion, Brain & Behavior 7: 1–14.Google Scholar
  68. Lawson, E. Thomas. 2000. Towards a cognitive science of religion. Numen 47: 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Leech, David, and Aku Visala. 2011. The cognitive science of religion: Implications for theism? Zygon 46: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Legare, C.H., E.M. Evans, K.S. Rosengren, and P.L. Harris. 2012. The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development 83: 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Legare, C.H., and S.A. Gelman. 2008. Bewitchment, biology or both: The co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science 32: 607–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Legare, Cristine H., and Rachel E. Watson-Jones. 2015. The evolution and ontogeny of ritual. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 829–847. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Lindeman, M., and A.M. Svedholm. 2012. What’s in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology 16: 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Malley, B. 2004. How the Bible works: An anthropological study of evangelical biblicism. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  76. McCauley, Robert N. (in press) Philosophical Foundations of the Cognitive Science of Religion. Bloomsbury Academic: London: UK.Google Scholar
  77. ———. 2011. Why religion is natural and science is not. Oxford: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  78. McCauley, Robert N., and Emma Cohen. 2010. Cognitive science and the naturalness of religion. Philosophy Compass 5: 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McCauley, Robert N., and E. Thomas Lawson. 2002. Bringing ritual to mind: Psychological foundations of cultural forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McCutcheon, R.T. 1997. Manufacturing religion: The discourse on Sui generis religion and the politics of Nostalgie. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. McKay, R., C. Efferson, H. Whitehouse, and E. Fehr. 2011. Wrath of god: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 278: 1858–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mckay, R., and H. Whitehouse. 2014. Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin 141: 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Murray, Michael J. 2008. Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of religion undermines the justification of religious belief. In The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques, ed. J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, and K. Wyman, 393–398. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  84. Nicholson, H. 2016. The spirit of contradiction in Christianity and Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Norenzayan, Ara. 2013. Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Norenzayan, Ara, Will Gervais, and K.H. Trzesniewski. 2012. Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS One 7: e36880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Norenzayan, Ara, and A.F. Shariff. 2008. The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Norenzayan, Ara, Azim F. Shariff, Will M. Gervais, Aiyana K. Willard, Rita A. McNamara, Edward Slingerland & Joseph Henrich. 2014. The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x14001356
  89. Purzycki, B.G.. 2013. The minds of gods: A comparative study of supernatural agency. Cognition 129: 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Richerson, P.J., and R. Boyd. 2008. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  91. Richert, R.A., and P.L. Harris. 2006. The ghost in my body: Children’s developping concept of the soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Shtulman, A., and K. Harrington. 2016. Tensions between science and intuition across lifespan. Topics in Cognitive Science 8: 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Slingerland, Edward. 2008. Who is afraid of reductionism? The study of religion in the age of cognitive science. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76: 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Slingerland, Edward, and J. Bulbulia. 2011. Introductory essay: Evolutionary science and the study of religion. Religion 41: 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Slingerland, Edward, and Bruce M. Sullivan. 2017. Durkheim with data: The database of religious history. Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 85 (2): 312–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Smith, J.Z. 2004. Relating religion: Essays in the study of religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  97. Sorensen, J. 2007. A cognitive theory of magic. Plymouth: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  98. Sosis, Richard. 2009. The adaptationist—by-product debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9: 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sosis, Richard, and E.R. Bressler. 2003. Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 37: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Swann, W.B., Jr., M.D. Buhrmester, A. Gómez, J. Jetten, B. Bastian, A. Vázquez, and G. Finchilescu. 2014. What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of family ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106: 912–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Taves, Ann. 2011. Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Trigg, Roger, and Justin L. Barrett. 2014. The roots of religion. Exploring the cognitive science of religion. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  103. Turchin, P., H. Whitehouse, P. Francois, E. Slingerland, and M. Collard. 2012. A historical database of sociocultural evolution. Cliodynamics. The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History 3: 271–273.Google Scholar
  104. Ward, T.B. 1994. Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology 27: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Watson-Jones, R. E., H. Whitehouse, and C. H. Legare. in press. In-group ostracism increases high fidelity imitation in early childhood. Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  106. White, Claire. 2016a. The cognitive foundations of reincarnation. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 28: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. ———. 2016b. Cross-cultural similarities in reasoning about personal continuity in reincarnation: Evidence from South India. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 6: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. ———. 2017. What the cognitive science of religion is (and is not). In Theory in a time of excess—The case of the academic study of religion, ed. Aaron W. Hughes. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  109. White, Claire, M. Marin, and M.T. Fessler. 2017. Not just dead meat: An evolutionary account of corpse treatment in mortuary rituals. Journal of Cognition and Culture 17: 146–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Whitehouse, Harvey. 1995. Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  111. ———. 2004. Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  112. ———. 2008. Cognitive evolution and religion; cognition and religious evolution. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 3.Google Scholar
  113. Willard, Aiyana K., and Ara Norenzayan. 2013. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition 129: 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  115. Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  116. Xygalatas, Dimitri, I. Konvalinka, J. Bulbulia, and A. Roepstorff. 2011. Quantifying collective effervescence: Heart-rate dynamics at a fire-walking ritual. Communicative & Integrative Biology 4: 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Xygalatas, Dimitri, and W.M. McCorkle. 2013. Mental culture: Classical social theory and the cognitive science of religion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religious StudiesCalifornia State UniversityNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations