Advertisement

Opening Up the Black Box

  • Leonidas Oikonomakis
Chapter

Abstract

This book started with two central questions. The first has to do with how social movements choose what political strategy to follow in their quest for social change. This question refers to the mechanisms that are set in motion in order for the movements to select their political strategy. In Chap.  2, I identified what the options available for social movements that want to bring about (or block) social change are. A typology was created which distinguishes between essentially two different roads to social change: one that passes through the seizure of state power (the state power road) and one that avoids any relationship with the state or its functions (the emancipatory road). The state power road also has two separate routes, depending on the means the movements choose in order to seize state power: the electoral route, which refers to the movement’s participation in parliamentary/electoral processes, and the insurgent route, which refers to the revolutionary seizure of state power. The above-mentioned roads and routes and their characteristics have been analysed thoroughly in Chap.  2 of this book.

Bibliography

  1. Castellanos, L. (2007). México armado 1943–1981. Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
  2. Cedillo, A. (2010a). El suspiro del silencio. De la reconstrucción de las Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional a la fundación del Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (1974–1983). México: UNAM.Google Scholar
  3. Downey, G. (1986). Ideology and the Clamshell Identity: Organizational Dilemmas in the Anti-Nuclear Power Movement. Social Problems, 33(5), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durand Ochoa, U. (2014). The Political Empowerment of the Cocaleros of Bolivia and Peru (Studies of the Americas). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FLN. (1969). Comunicado a Todos Los Miembros de Las FLN: Sobre La Militancia.Google Scholar
  6. Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion. People, Passions, and Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Grupo Editorial de la Casa de Todas y Todos. (2014). Septiembre de 2014, ¡Compañero Mario, Presente! Casa de Todas Y Todos (blog). September 2014. http://casadetodasytodos.org/septiembre-de-2014-companero-mario-presente/
  8. Gunderson, C. (2013). The Provocative Cocktail. Intellectual Origins of the Zapatista Uprising. 1960–1994. New York: The City University of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Henck, N. (2016). Insurgent Marcos: The Political-Philosophical Formation of the Zapatista Subcommander. History and Social Sciences. Raleigh: Editorial A Contracorriente.Google Scholar
  10. Holloway, J. (1998). Dignity’s Revolt. In J. Holloway & E. Pelaez (Eds.), Zapatista!: Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London/Sterling: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jasper, J. (2004). A Strategic Approach to Collective Action: Looking for Agency in Social-Movement Choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Jasper, J. M. (2006). Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marcos, M. (1981). Nada es gratuito en la historia. Madera 1965. La primera lucha armada por el socialismo en México. Rebeldia.Google Scholar
  14. O’Connor, F. P., & Oikonomakis, L. (2015). Preconflict Mobilization Strategies and Urban-Rural Transition: The Cases of the PKK and the FLN/EZLN. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-3-379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roos, J. E., & Oikonomakis, L. (2014). They Don’t Represent Us! The Global Resonance of the Real Democracy Movement from the Indignados to Occupy. In D. Della Porta & A. Mattoni (Eds.), Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis (pp. 117–137). Colchester: ECPR – Studies in European Political Science, ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  16. Silva, E. (2009). Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Webber, J. (2014). Managing Bolivian Capitalism. Jacobin. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/01/managing-bolivian-capitalism/
  18. Webber, J. R., & Carr, B. (Eds.). (2013). From Left-Indigenous Insurrection to Reconstituted Neoliberalism in Bolivia: Political Economy, Indigenous Liberation, and Class Struggle, 2000–2011. In The New Latin American Left: Cracks in the Empire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Wickham-Crowley, T. P. (1993). Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes Since 1956. 1st Princeton pbk. Printing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonidas Oikonomakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CreteCreteGreece

Personalised recommendations