Advertisement

Education, SES, and Intelligence

  • Carmen Flores-Mendoza
  • Rubén Ardila
  • Ricardo Rosas
  • María Emilia Lucio
  • Miguel Gallegos
  • Norma Reátegui Colareta
Chapter

Abstract

Three studies analyzed the effect of education and social variables on intelligence (represented by one cognitive measure and at the g level) using samples from the SLATINT Project. The results indicated that intelligence, as measured by one measure (e.g., the SPM or IR test), was slightly influenced by education or the SES of schools. However, when intelligence was represented at the latent level (or g factor), the influence of social variables decreased. On the other hand, school performance was primarily influenced by cognitive differences, and secondly by the SES of schools.

Keywords

School performance Intelligence SES PISA 

References

  1. Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman, M. L. (1989). Testing individual differences in ancient China. American Psychologist, 44, 576–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslow, N. E., & Clayton D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 9–25.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Deary, I. J., Johnson, W., & Houlihan, L. M. (2009). Genetic foundations of human intelligence. Human Genetics, 126, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flores-Mendoza, C., Mansur-Alves, M., Ardila, R., Rosas, R. D., Guerrero-Leiva, M. K., Maqueo, M. E. L.-G., Gallegos, M., …León, A. B. (2015). Fluid intelligence and school performance and its relationship with social variables in Latin American samples. Intelligence, 49, 66–83. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flores-Mendoza, C., Saraiva, R. B., Câmara, G. C. B., Lopes, W. M. G., Passos, A. P. C. P., Gama, A. M. V. P., … Reategui, N. (2017). Socioeconomic environment effect on inferential reasoning of Latin American Students. Revista de Salud Mental, 40, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2006). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40-year retrospective (WCER Working Paper No. 2006-9). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved [December 09, 2017] from https://wcer.wisc.edu/publications/year/2006http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.phpGoogle Scholar
  9. Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., & Loehlin, J. C. (2007). Genotype by environment interaction in adolescents’ cognitive aptitude. Behavior Genetics, 37, 273–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9113-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1162−1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, F. B., Goldberg, J., Hedeker, D., Flay, B. F., & Pentz, M. A. (1998). Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, 694–703. Retrieved from http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/147/7/694.short.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaufman, S. B., Reynolds, M. R., Liu, X., Kaufman, A. S., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynn, R., & Hattori, K. (1990). The heritability of intelligence in Japan. Behavior genetics, 20, 545–546.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067719 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall, A., Keynes, J. M., & Guillebaud, C. W. (1978). Obras escogidas. DF Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica.Google Scholar
  15. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory effective? A meta-analytic review. Development Psychology, 49, 270–291.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neisser, E.U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T., Boykin, A., Brody, N., Ceci, S., …Urbina, S. (1996): Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 2, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Vol. 1 Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2006_9789264040014-en.
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do — Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I).  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en.
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results in focus: What 15-years-old know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2012-results-what-students-know-and-can-do-volume-i-revised-editionfebruary-2014_9789264208780-en.
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 Technical Report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2003-technical-report_9789264010543-en.
  22. Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1980). Genetics and intelligence: Recent data. Intelligence, 4, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Krapohl, E., Simpson, M. A., Reichenberg, A., … Plomin, R. (2015). Thinking positively: The genetics of high intelligence. Intelligence, 48, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sisto, F. F. (2006). Teste de raciocínio inferencial. São Paulo: Vetor Editora Psicopedagógica.Google Scholar
  25. Soares, J. F., & Andrade, R. J. (2006). Nível socioeconômico, qualidade e eqüidade das escolas de Belo Horizonte [Socioeconomic status, quality and equity in the schools of Belo Horizonte]. Ensaio: Avaliação de Política Pública de Educação, 14, 107–126. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ensaio/v14n50/30410.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, T. W., Waskom, M. L., Garel, K.-L. A., Cardenas-Iniguez, C., Reynolds, G. O., Winter, R. … Gabrieli, J. D. (2013). Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence. PLoS ONE, 8, e63614. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Bates, T. C. (2015). Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychological Science, 27, 138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615612727 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., & D’Onofrio, B. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2005). Literacy for life. efa global monitoring report. France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  30. World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth. Retrieved 9 December 2017, from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Flores-Mendoza
    • 1
  • Rubén Ardila
    • 2
  • Ricardo Rosas
    • 3
  • María Emilia Lucio
    • 4
  • Miguel Gallegos
    • 5
  • Norma Reátegui Colareta
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Psychology Federal University of Minas Gerais, Psychology InstituteBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyNational University of ColombiaBogotaColombia
  3. 3.School of PsychologyPontifical Catholic University of ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Mental Health and Diagnosis Program Faculty of PsychologyNational Autonomous University of MexicoMexico CityMexico
  5. 5.Faculty of PsychologyNational University of RosarioRosarioArgentina
  6. 6.Faculty of HumanitiesSan Ignacio de Loyola UniversityLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations