Advertisement

Prime Ministerial Management of the Parliamentary Party in European Policy

  • Birgit Bujard
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Political Science book series (CPS)

Abstract

This chapter analyses the behaviour of the governmental parliamentary party in European policy. Did it mainly support the government and prime minister or were there regular rebellions? Its voting record on European policy in general is addressed here with particular reference to the ERM and EMU case studies. A broader view of the parliamentary party’s behavioural pattern and its impact on the PM’s political leadership is taken, because it can be assumed to form the trajectory for its likely behaviour on ERM and EMU. This is important as in some cases parliament did not vote on European monetary policy issues as the government did not introduce legislation on it. This chapter also considers the prime minister’s management of his parliamentary party.

References

  1. Alderman, K. (1996). The passage of the European Communities (finance) Act (1995) and its aftermath. Contemporary British History, 10(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, D., Gamble, A., Ludlam, S., & Seawright, D. (1999). Backbenchers with attitude: A seismic study of the Conservative Party and dissent on Europe. In S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, & R. S. Katz (Eds.), Party discipline and parliamentary government (pp. 72–93). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bale, T. (2016). The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, D., & Butler, G. (2006). British political facts since 1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, D., & Kavanagh, D. (Eds.). (1980). The British general election of 1979. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, D., & Kavanagh, D. (Eds.). (1988). The British general election of 1987. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  7. Callaghan, J. (2006). Time and chance. London: Politico’s.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. (1999). The Tories: Conservatives and the nation state 1922-1997 (2nd ed.). London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  9. Cowley, P. (2005). The rebels: How Blair mislaid his majority. London: Politico’s.Google Scholar
  10. Cowley, P. (2007). Parliament. In A. Seldon (Ed.), Blair’s Britain, 1997-2007 (pp. 16–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cowley, P. (2008, January 21). This will not be like Maastricht. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  12. Cowley, P., & Norton, P. (1996). Are Conservative MPs revolting? Dissension by government MPs in the British House of Commons 1979-1996, University of Hull: Centre for Legislative Studies, Research Papers in Legislative Studies, No. 2/96.Google Scholar
  13. Cowley, P., & Norton, P. (1999). Rebels and rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992 Parliament. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(1), 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2003). In place of strife? The PLP in Government, 1997-2001. Political Studies, 51(2), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2005). Parliament. In A. Seldon & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The Blair effect 2001-5 (pp. 20–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2006, November). Dissension amongst the Parliamentary Labour Party, 2005-2006: A data handbook. http://www.revolts.co.uk/Dissension%20data%20handbook%202005-06%20Final.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2016.
  17. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2007a, November). From Blair to Brown: Dissension in the Parliamentary Labour Party, 2006-2007: A data handbook. http://www.revolts.co.uk/Dissension%20handbook%202006-7%20web%20version.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2016.
  18. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2007b, September 12). Europe: The dog that hasn’t barked (yet?). http://www.revolts.co.uk/The%20dog%20that%20didnt%20bark.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2016.
  19. Donoughue, B. (1987). Prime minister: The conduct of policy under Harold Wilson & James Callaghan. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  20. Donoughue, B. (2009). Downing Street diary: With James Callaghan in No. 10 (2nd ed.). London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  21. Dunleavy, P., & Jones, G. W. (with Burnham, J., Elgie, R., & Fysh, P.) (1993). Leaders, politics and institutional change: The decline of prime ministerial accountability to the House of Commons, 1868-1990. British Journal of Political Studies, 23(3), 267–298.Google Scholar
  22. Gamble, A., & Kelly, G. (2000). The British Labour Party and monetary union. West European Politics, 23(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geddes, A. (2013). Britain and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. George, S. (1998). An awkward partner: Britain in the European Community (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, E. (1978a, November 28). EMS veto sought. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  26. Goodman, E. (1978b, November 29). We won’t join EMS yet—Healey. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  27. Gowland, D., Turner, A., & Wright, A. (2010). Britain and European Integration since 1945: On the sidelines. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. HC Deb. (1976, April 5), Vol 909, cc29–164.Google Scholar
  29. HC Deb. (1978, December 13), Vol 906, cc811–844.Google Scholar
  30. HC Deb. (1990, November 13), Vol 180, cc461–465.Google Scholar
  31. HC Deb. (1992, September 24), Vol 212, c4.Google Scholar
  32. HC Deb. (1993, June 9), Vol 226, cc284–285.Google Scholar
  33. House of Commons Information Office. (2003, September). By-election results: 1992-1997. Factsheet M14 Members series, revised edition.Google Scholar
  34. House of Commons Library. (2016, May 23). Number of House of Commons divisions, Standard Note No. SN/PC/04670.Google Scholar
  35. Kavanagh, D., & Seldon, A. (2000). The powers behind the prime minister: The hidden influence of Number Ten (2nd ed.). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  36. Ludlow, P. (1982). The making of the European Monetary System. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  37. Major, J. (2000). The autobiography (2nd ed.). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, I. (1990). Liberal priorities, the Lib-Lab-Pact and the requirements for policy influence. Parliamentary Affairs, 43(3), 292–321.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, V. (2008, January 22). EU treaty bills: The whip and referendum clauses. House of Commons Library Standard Note No. SN/IA/4650.Google Scholar
  40. Norton, P. (1980). Dissension in the House of Commons 1974-1979. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Norton, P. (1985). Behavioural changes, backbench independence in the 1980s. In P. Norton (Ed.), Parliament in the 1980s (pp. 22–47). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Powell, J. (2010). The new Machiavelli: How to wield power in the modern world. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  43. Rawstorne, P. (1978, November 30). Britain not to join EMS without changes—Healey. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  44. Riddell, P. (1994). Major and parliament. In D. Kavanagh & A. Seldon (Eds.), The Major effect (pp. 46–63). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Rose, R. (2001). The prime minister in a shrinking world. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Seldon, A. (with Baston, L.) (1998). Major: A political life (2nd ed.). London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  47. Stephens, P. (1989, December 12). Thatcher says Britain may join ERM ahead of general election. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  48. Stephens, P. (1997). Politics and the pound: The Tories, the economy and Europe (2nd ed.). London: Papermac.Google Scholar
  49. Stuart, M. (2009). The role of parliament under Blair. In T. Casey (Ed.), The Blair legacy: Politics, policy, governance and foreign affairs (pp. 178–189). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thatcher, M. (2011). The Downing Street years. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  51. Thomas, G. P. (1998). The prime minister and cabinet today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, G. P. (2004). United Kingdom: The prime minister and parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 10(2/3), 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson, H. (1996). The British Conservative government and the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, 1979–1994. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  54. The National Archives [hereafter TNA]. (1977, February 25). Records of the Cabinet Office [hereafter CAB] 128/61, CM (77), 8th Conclusions.Google Scholar
  55. TNA. (1978, June 8). CAB 128/64, CM (78) 21st Conclusions.Google Scholar
  56. TNA. (1978, November 30). CAB 128/64, CM (78) 41st Conclusions.Google Scholar
  57. TNA. (1978, December 7). CAB 128/64, CM (78) 42nd Conclusions.Google Scholar
  58. TNA. (1978, December 19). CAB 128/64, CM (78) 44th Conclusions.Google Scholar
  59. UK Parliament. (2016a). Allocation of time motions. http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/allocation-of-time-motion/. Accessed September 28, 2016.
  60. UK Parliament. (2016b). Programme motion. http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/programme-motion/. Accessed September 28, 2016.
  61. UK Parliament. (2016c). Whips. http://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/principal/whips/. Accessed August 28, 2016.
  62. Wall, S. (2008). A stranger in Europe: Britain and the EU from Thatcher to Blair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgit Bujard
    • 1
  1. 1.CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations