Advertisement

How to Start an Environmental Software Project

  • Ioannis N. Athanasiadis
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 507)

Abstract

How to lay the grounds for interdisciplinary teams to start communicating and collaborating effectively remains an obstacle for many environmental software efforts. In this work, a structured, participatory interactive method is introduced: The Inception Workshop aims to assist interdisciplinary teams at the start-up stage of an environmental software project, with the goal to explore the solution space and for early requirements analysis. It is an ice-breaker event to engage heterogeneous actors to open up, express their interests, and start working together to identify and solve common problems. Two installations of the workshop were conducted, and participant familiarity to the problem and technologies involved were captured with pre- and post-workshop questionnaires. Participant responses proved statistical significance in increasing participant confidence with concepts across disciplines.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Author was partially supported by the Greek Secretariat of Research and Technology Collaboration (ALPINE grant 11SYN-6-411), and the IPA cross-border programme (AITOLOS grant IPA/2010/DN022619/CN314 294) which is co-funded by the EU and by national funds of the participating countries. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The author would like to thank the participants of both workshops for their encouraging comments.

References

  1. 1.
    AITOLOS Consortium, Project website (2012). http://www.aitolos.eu
  2. 2.
    Anastasiadou, D., Koulinas, K., Kiourtsis, F., Athanasiadis, I.N.: Complementary software solutions for efficient timber logging and trade management. In: Gomez, J.M., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection (Enviroinfo 2014), University of Oldenburg BIS Verlag, Oldenburg, Germany, 2014, pp. 783–788 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Athanasiadis, I.N., Anastasiadou, D., Koulinas, K., Kiourtsis, F.: Identifying smart solutions for fighting illegal logging and timber trade. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Kubásek, M., Rizzoli, A.E. (eds.) ISESS 2013. IAICT, vol. 413, pp. 143–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Athanasiadis, I.N., Villa, F., Examiliotou, G., Iliopoulos, Y., Mertzanis, Y.: Towards a semantic framework for wildlife modeling. In: Gomez, J.M., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection (Enviroinfo 2014), University of Oldenburg BIS Verlag, Oldenburg, Germany, pp. 287–292 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjørner, D.: Domain engineering. In: Boca, P., Bowen, J., Siddiqi, J. (eds.) Formal Methods: State of the Art and New Directions. Springer, London (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-736-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    vom Brocke, J., Lippe, S.: Managing collaborative research projects: a synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 1022–1039 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cobb, C.G.: Making Sense of Agile Project Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glinz, M., Wieringa, R.J.: Guest editors’ introduction: stakeholders in requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 24, 18–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janssen, S.J.: Managing the hydra in integration: developing an integrated assessment tool for agricultural systems. Wageningen University (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Offen, R.: Domain understanding is the key to successful system development. Requir. Eng. 7, 172–175 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhoten, D.: Interdisciplinary research: trend or transition. Items Issues 5, 6–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., Galal, G.: Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. pp. 387–391 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voinov, A., Shugart, H.H.: ‘Integronsters’, integral and integrated modeling. Environ. Model Softw. 39, 149–158 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    WGBH: Enhancing Education: A Producer’s Guide (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, Z., Arvela, M., Berki, E., Muhonen, M., Nummenmaa, J., Poranen, T.: Towards lightweight requirements documentation. J. Softw. Eng. App. 3, 882–889 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Athanasiadis, I.N.: Anonymized survey responses from two Inception Workshops [Data set]. Zenodo (2017). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1041743

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations