Imaging of Nonneoplastic Esophageal Pathologies

  • Elena Lucia Indino
  • Alessandro di Gaeta
  • Gianmarco Andreoli
  • Maurizio Del Monte
  • Valeria PanebiancoEmail author


The esophagus is an organ which consists of a fibromuscular tube which enables the passage of food. This transmission is aided by peristaltic contractions, from the pharynx to the stomach, where the process of digestion reaches the acme. Efficient transport through the esophagus requires the organ either to be patent and well canalized or to have adequate motility. This consists of coordinating sequential contraction that mobilizes the bolus from above and clears acid and bile reflux from below. Dysfunction of this integrated muscular motion reduces progression of bolus and causes a distressing sense of dysphagia, chest pain, and regurgitation, or leads to other severe conditions (i.e., ab ingestis pneumonia).

In this scenario modern imaging techniques, either invasive or noninvasive, concede an early and accurate diagnosis that radically changed the approach to those disorders. In fact a predominant role is played by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but conventional radiology (barium esophagography; endoscopic ultrasonography, EUS) is still essential. Among those techniques, dynamic MRI of the esophagus has developed a great potential, with the introduction of ultrafast MR sequences, which have decreased scan times, granting a minor exposure to ionizing radiation.


Esophagus Esophagus congenital malformation Esophagus motility Hiatus hernia Esophageal trauma Esophageal atresia Achalasia Esophagitis, reflux 



Congenital esophageal stenosis


Computed tomography


Diffuse esophageal spasm


Esophageal atresia




Gastroesophageal reflux disease


Hounsfield unit


Ineffective esophageal motility


Magnetic resonance imaging


Nonspecific esophageal motility dysfunction


Scleroderma of the esophagus


Tracheoesophageal fistula


Upper esophageal sphincter


  1. 1.
    Berrocal T, Madrid C, Novo S, et al. Congenital anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree, lung, and mediastinum: embryology, radiology, and pathology. Radiographics. 2003;24:e17. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekberg O. Normal anatomy and techniques of examination of the esophagus: fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, and scintigraphy. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, editors. Margulis and Burhenne’s alimentary tract radiology. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 168–85.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herbella FA, Patti MG. Modern pathophysiology and treatment of esophageal diverticula. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(1):29–35. Accessed Jan 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vaz M, Raj T, Anura K. Guyton & Hall textbook of medical physiology. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2016. p. 747–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mason RJ, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR, Crookes PF, Peters JH, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR. Pharyngeal swallowing disorders: selection for and outcome after myotomy. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):598–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panebianco V, Tomei E, Anzidei M, Habib FI, Catalano C, Lisi D, Laghi A, Passariello R. Functional MRI in the evaluation of oesophageal motility: feasibility, MRI patterns of normality, and preliminary experience in subjects with motility disorders. Radiol Med. 2006;111(7):881–9. Accessed 11 Oct 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Covotta F, Piretta L, Badiali D, Laghi A, Biondi T, Corazziari ES, Panebianco V. Functional magnetic resonance in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:367639. Accessed 29 Aug 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panebianco V, Habib FI, Tomei E, Paolantonio P, Anzidei M, Laghi A, Catalano C, Passariello R. Initial experience with magnetic resonance fluoroscopy in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Comparison with manometry and barium fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(9):1926–33. Accessed 26 April 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitor nonacidic reflux. Am J Med. 2001;111(Suppl 8A):160S–8S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fiorentino E, Barbiera F, Runza G, Pangaro A, Rapisarda E, Latteri S, Valenti A, La Rocca A, Maiorana A, Mastrosimone A. Digital cineradiology in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of pharyngo-oesophageal junction motor disorders. Chir Ital. 2004;56(4):495–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schima W, Ryan JM, Harisinghani M, Schober E, Pokieser P, Denk DM, Stacher G. Radiographic detection of achalasia: diagnostic accuracy of videofluoroscopy. Clin Radiol. 1998;53(5):372–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schima W, Stacher G, Pokieser P, Uranitsch K, Nekahm D, Schober E, Moser G, Tscholakoff D. Esophageal motor disorders: videofluoroscopic and manometric evaluation—prospective study in 88 symptomatic patients. Radiology. 1992;185(2):487–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prabhakar A, Levine MS, Rubesin S, Laufer I, Katzka D. Relationship between diffuse esophageal spasm and lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction on barium studies and manometry in 14 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(2):409–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nelson JB, Castell DO. Esophageal motility disorders. Dis Mon. 1988;34(6):297–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ipsen P, Egekvist H, Aksglaede K, Zachariae H, Bjerring P, Thommesen P. Oesophageal manometry and video-radiology in patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective study of its clinical value. Acta Derm Venereol. 2000;80(2):130–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boyce HW Jr, Boyce G. Esophagus: anatomy and structural anomalies. In: Yamada T, editor. Textbook of gastroenterology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 1148–65.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bergeron JL, Long JL, Chhetri DK. Dysphagia characteristics in Zenker’s diverticulum. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(2):223–8. Accessed Feb 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    James B, Nelson MD, Donald O, Castell MD. Esophageal motility disorders. (2015). Accessed 19 Dec 2014.
  19. 19.
    Dellon ES, Gibbs WB, Fritchie KJ, Rubinas TC, Wilson LA, Woosley JT, et al. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings distinguish eosinophilic esophagitis from gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(12):1305–13; quiz 1261. Accessed Dec 2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr. Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1173–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, Bacchetta M, Altorki NK. Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(4):1071–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rubesin SE, Levine MS. Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41(6):1095–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Young CA, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Prasad SR. CT Features of esophageal emergencies. Radiographics. 2008;28:1541–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Società Italiana di Endoscopia Digestiva (S.I.E.D.). Linee guida per la rimozione endoscopica di corpi estranei. Clinical Guideline 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Macedo GF, Ferreira FG, Ribeiro MA, Szutan LA, Assef MS, Rossini LG. Reliability in endoscopic diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5(7):323–31. Accessed 16 Jul 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Furuichi Y, Kawai T, Ichimura S, Metoki R, Miyata Y, Oshima T, et al. Flexible imaging color enhancement improves visibility of transnasal endoscopic images in diagnosing esophageal varices: a multicenter prospective blinded study. J Dig Dis. 2012;13(12):634–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim SH, Kim YJ, Lee JM, Choi KD, Chung YJ, Han JK, et al. Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography—comparison with endoscopy. Radiology. 2007;242(3):759–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):601–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Lucia Indino
    • 1
  • Alessandro di Gaeta
    • 1
  • Gianmarco Andreoli
    • 2
  • Maurizio Del Monte
    • 1
  • Valeria Panebianco
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopatological SciencesSapienza—University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto IRomeItaly
  2. 2.Hospital Policlinico Umberto I of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations