Abstract
Mass customization and product individualization are driving factors behind design automation, which in turn are enabled through the formalization and automation of engineering work. The goal is to offer customers optimized solutions to their needs timely and as profitable as possible. The path to achieve such a remarkable goal can be very winding and tricky for many companies, or even non-existing at the moment being. To succeed requires three essential parts: formally represented product knowledge, facilities to automatically apply the product knowledge, and optimization algorithms. This paper shows how these three parts can be supported in engineer-to-order businesses through the concept of knowledge objects. Knowledge Objects are human readable descriptions of formalized knowledge bundled with corresponding computer routines for the automation of that knowledge. One case example is given at the end of the paper to demonstrate the use of knowledge objects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Note that the knowledge representations not necessarily need to be physically stored within the knowledge object. The description compartment may consist of references to the representations as well. The user will get the feeling that description and automation compartments form a whole.
- 2.
A human reader of the knowledge base may also follow these paths of automation because they make sense.
- 3.
In the case example all Knowledge Objects are targeting Spread Sheets. However, Knowledge Objects can target CAD-models, databases, constraint solvers, FEM-simulations, or practically any software. The case example was selected to demonstrate the looping functionality.
References
Agnar A, Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun 7(1):39–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-1994-7104
Arora RK (2015) Optimization: algorithms and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Blecker T, Abdelkafi N (2006) Mass customization: state-of-the-art and challenges. Springer, Boston, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32224-8_1
Box MJ (1965) A new method of constrained optimization and a comparison with other methods. Comput J 8(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/8.1.42
Da Silveira G, Borenstein D, Fogliatto F (2001) Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 72(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00079-7
Elgh F (2011) Modeling and management of product knowledge in an engineer-to-order business model. In: ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design—Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, vol 6, pp 86–95
Elgh F, Cederfeldt M (2007) Concurrent cost estimation as a tool for enhanced producibility-system development and applicability for producibility studies. Int J Prod Econ 109(1–2):12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.007
Elgh F, Johansson J (2014) Knowledge object—a concept for task modelling supporting design automation. In: Moving integrated product development to service clouds in the global economy—Proceedings of the 21st ISPE Inc. International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, CE 2014, pp 192–203. IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-440-4-192
Fogliatto F, Da Silveira G, Borenstein D (2012) The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int J Prod Econ 138(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.002
Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1–3):50–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001
Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R (2012) A practical guide to SysML. Elsevier, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385206-9.10001-8
Guin JA (1968) Modification of the complex method of constrained optimization. Comput J 10(4):416. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/10.4.416
Hvam L, Mortensen N, Riis J (2008) Product customization. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71449-1_1
Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4
Johansson, J (2007) A flexible design automation system for toolsets for the rotary draw bending of aluminium tubes. In: ASME/IEEE International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications and the 19th Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention Conference, vol 4, pp 861–870. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-34310
Johansson J (2011) How to build flexible design automation systems for manufacturability analysis of the draw bending of aluminum profiles. J Manuf Sci Eng 133(6):061027. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005355
Johansson J (2015) Howtomation suite: a novel tool for flexible design automation. In: Transdisciplinary lifecycle analysis of systems: Proceedings of the 22nd ISPE Inc. International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, July 20–23, 2015, no. 2 in Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, pp 327–336. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-544-9-327
Kennedy M, Harmon K, Minnock E (2008) Ready, set, dominate: implement Toyota’s set-based learning for developing products and nobody can catch you. Oaklea Press
La Rocca G, van Tooren M (2012) Knowledge based engineering to support complex product design. Adv Eng Inf 26(2):157–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.008
Pabolu VKR, Stolt R, Johansson J (2016) Manufacturability analysis for welding: a case study using howtomationsuite. In: Transdisciplinary engineering: crossing boundaries, no. 4 in advances in transdisciplinary engineering, pp 695–704. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-703-0-695
Pardalos P, Resende MGC (2002) Handbook of applied optimization, vol 26
Pine B, Davis S (1999) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard
Poorkiany M, Johansson J, Elgh F (2016) Capturing, structuring and accessing design rationale in integrated product design and manufacturing processes. Adv Eng Inf 30(3):522–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.06.004
Rudberg M, Wikner J (2004) Mass customization in terms of the customer order decoupling point. Prod Planning Control 15(4):445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953728042000238764
Schreiber GT, Akkermans H (2000) Knowledge engineering and management: the commonKADS methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Simon H (1973) The structure of ill structured problems. Artif Intell 4(3–4):181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
Zhu GN, Hu J, Qi J, Ma J, Peng YH (2015) An integrated feature selection and cluster analysis techniques for case-based reasoning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.11.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johansson, J., Elgh, F. (2019). Knowledge Objects Enable Mass-Individualization. In: Andrés-Pérez, E., González, L., Periaux, J., Gauger, N., Quagliarella, D., Giannakoglou, K. (eds) Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design Optimization and Control With Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89889-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89890-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)