Advertisement

Soft Tissue Reconstructive Options for the Ulcerated or Gangrenous Diabetic Foot

  • Matthew L. IorioEmail author
  • Karen Kim Evans
  • Christopher E. Attinger
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Contemporary Diabetes book series (CDI)

Abstract

The complex biomechanics of the foot and ankle allow for a highly efficient and coordinated functional unit capable of nearly 10,000 steps a day. However, changes in sensation, motor function, skeletal stability, blood supply, and immune status render the foot and ankle susceptible to breakdown. Inability to salvage the injured foot traditionally has led to major amputation, carrying with it dramatic morbid sequelae and a lifetime dependence on prosthetic devices. Worldwide, a limb is lost to diabetes nearly every 30 s [Young, Lancet. 366(9498):1687, 2005]. Consequently, the relative 5-year mortality rate after limb amputation is greater than 50%, a startling figure when compared to mortality rates of lung cancer (86%), colon cancer (39%), and breast cancer (23%) [Armstrong et al., Int Wound J. 4(4):286–287, 2007].

Because the foot and ankle is such a complex body part, salvage often demands a multidisciplinary team approach. This team ideally should consist of a vascular surgeon skilled in endovascular and distal bypass techniques, a foot and ankle surgeon skilled in internal and external bone stabilization techniques, a soft tissue surgeon familiar with modern wound healing as well as soft tissue reconstructive techniques, an infectious disease specialist to manage antibiotic therapy, and an endocrinologist to help manage the glucose levels. Surgical goals include transforming the chronic wound into an acute healing wound with healthy granulation tissue, neo-epithelialization, and wrinkled skin edges. This may include ensuring a good local blood supply, debriding the wound to a clean base, correcting any biomechanical abnormality, and nurturing the wound until it shows signs of healing. The subsequent reconstruction can then usually be accomplished by simple techniques, 90% of the time and complex flap reconstruction in 10% of cases. This chapter focuses on the critical aspects of limb salvage including evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment with a focus on flap-based reconstructions.

Keywords

Diabetic foot ulcer Soft tissue reconstruction Microsurgery Ulcerated foot Gangrenous foot Negative pressure wound therapy Local flap Debridement Fasciocutaneous flap Perforator flap Skin graft Limb salvage 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Young M. Putting feet first: diabetic foot care worldwide. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong David G, James W, Robbins Jeffery M. Are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J. 2007;4(4):286–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Margolis D, et al. Location, location, location: geographic clustering of lower-extremity amputation among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodeheaver GT. Wound cleansing, wound irrigation, wound disinfection. In: Krasner D, Kane D, editors. Chronic wound care. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: Health Management Publication, Inc; 1997. p. 97–108.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(9):2595–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers LC, Bevilacqua NJ, Armstrong DG, Andros G. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(4):799–802.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, et al. Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers: a clinical sign of osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA. 1995;273:721–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Attinger CE, Cooper P, Blume P, Bulan EJ. The safest surgical incisions and amputations using the Angiosome concept and Doppler on arterial-arterial connections of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:745–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolff H, Hansson C. Larval therapy—an effective method of ulcer debridement. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherman RA, Sherman J, Gilead L, et al. Maggot therapy in outpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2001;81:1226–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhodes GR, King TA. Delayed skin oxygenation following distal tibial revascularization. Implications for wound healing in late amputations. Am Surg. 1986;52:519–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boulton AJ. What you can’t feel can hurt you. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010;100(5):349–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armstrong DG, Stacpoole-Shea S, Nguyen H. Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot. Adv Ortho Surg. 1999;23:71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mueller MJ, Sinacore DR, Hastings MK, et al. Effect of Achilles tendon lengthening on neuropathic plantar ulcers, a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Sur Am. 2003;85a:1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maluf KS, Mueller MJ, Hastings MK, et al. Tendon Achilles lengthening for the treatment neuropathic ulcers causes a temporary reduction in forefoot pressure associated with changes in plantar flexor power rather than ankle motion during gait. J Biomech. 2004;37:897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sheehan P. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes: consensus statement recommends screening. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:179–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamada T, Ohta T, Ishibashi H, Sugimoto I, Iwata H, Takahashi M, Kawanishi J. Clinical reliability and utility of skin perfusion pressure measurement in ischemic limbs – comparison with other noninvasive diagnostic methods. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Falanga V. Growth factors and chronic wounds: the need to understand the microenvironment. J Dermatol. 1992;19:667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edwards R, Harding KG. Bacteria and wound healing. Curr Opin Inf Dis. 2004;17:91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, et al. Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:61–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edgerton MT. The art of surgical technique. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1988.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brem H, Stojadinovic O, Diegelmann RF, Entero H, Lee B, Pastar I, Golinko M, Rosenberg H, Tomic-Canic M. Molecular markers in patients with chronic wounds to guide surgical debridement. Mol Med. 2007;13(1–2):30–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Inf Dis. 2004;39:885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:563–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Olawoye O, Crist BD, Gabriel A, Galiano RD, Gupta S, Lantis Ii JC, Lavery L, Lipsky BA, Teot L. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: review of evidence and recommendations. Wounds. 2015;27(12):S2–S19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Oliver N, Garwood C, Evans KK, Steinberg JS, Lavery LA. Comparison of outcomes for normal saline and an antiseptic solution for negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):657e–64e.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lehner B, Fleischmann W, Becker R, Jukema GN. First experiences with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation in the treatment of infected orthopaedic implants: a clinical observational study. Int Orthop. 2011;35(9):1415–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Joseph E, Hamori CA, Bergman S, et al. A prospective randomized trial of vacuum assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic non-healing wounds. Wounds. 2000;12:60.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Byrd HS, Spicer TE, Cierny G III. Management of open tibial fractures. Plast Reconst Surg. 1985;76:719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krizek TJ, Robson MC. The evolution of quantitative bacteriology in wound management. Am J Surg. 1975;130:579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shuck J, Nolan J, Kanuri A, Evans KK, Attinger CE. The effect of positive post-debridement cultures on local muscle flap reconstruction of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(4 Suppl):9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A, et al. Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4 week period is a robust indicator of complete healing in a 12 week prospective trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haimowitz JE, Margolis DJ. Moist wound healing. In: Krasner D, Kane D, editors. Chronic wound care. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: Health Management Publication, Inc.; 1997. p. 49–56.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Game FL, Attinger C, Hartemann A, Hinchliffe RJ, Löndahl M, Price PE, Jeffcoate WJ. IWGDF guidance on use of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):75–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steed DL. The diabetic study group: clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet derived growth factor for treatment of lower extremity diabetic ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:71–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bromberg BE, Song IC, Mohn MP. The use of pigskin as a temporary biological dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bondoc CC, Butke JF. Clinical experience with viable frozen human skin and frozen skin bank. Ann Surg. 1971;174:371.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Omar AA, Mavor AI, Jones AM, et al. Treatment of venous leg ulcers with Dermagraft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(6):666.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Falanga V, Sabolinski M. A bilayered skin construct (APLIGRAF) accelerates complete closure of hard to heal venous stasis ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7:201.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Veves A, Falanga V, Armstrong DG. Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of non-infected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:290–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, et al. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1701.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, Regulski M, Vayser D, Fried D, Kashefsky H, Owings TM, Nadarajah J. The efficacy and safety of Grafix(®) for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi-Centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Int Wound J. 2014;11(5):554–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Driver VR, Lavery LA, Reyzelman AM, Dutra TG, Dove CR, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Chung KC. A clinical trial of Integra template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(6):891–900.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hunt TK, Pai MP. The effect of varying ambient oxygen tensions on wound metabolism and collagen synthesis. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1972;135:561.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pai MP, Hunt TK. Effect of varying oxygen tension on healing in open wounds. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1972;135:756–7.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fosen KM, Thom SR. Hyperbaric oxygen, vasculogenic stem cells, and wound healing. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21(11):1634–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hohn DC, Mackay RD, Halliday B, et al. The effect of oxygen tension on the microbiocidal function of leukocytes in wounds and in vitro. Surg Forum. 1976;27:18–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bonomo SR, Davidson JD, Tyrone JW, et al. Enhancement of wound healing by hyperbaric oxygen and transforming growth factor beta3 in a new chronic wound model in aged rabbits. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Attinger CE, Janis JE, Steinberg J. Clinical approach to wounds: debridement and wound bed preparation including the use of dressings and wound-healing adjuvants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7S):72S–109S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1704–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Steed DL. Clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic ulcers. Diabetic Ulcer Study. Group J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(1):71–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brem H, Balledux J, Bloom T. Healing of diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers with human skin equivalent: a new paradigm in wound healing. Arch Surg. 2000;135(6):627–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Falanga V, Sabolinski M. A bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF®) accelerates complete closure of hard-to-heal venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(4):201–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gentzkow GD, Iwasaki S, Hershon KS, et al. Use of dermagraft, a cultured human dermis, to treat diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:350–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Faglia E, Favales F, Aldeghi A, Calia P, Quarantiello A, Oriani G, Michael M, Campagnoli P, Morabito A. Adjunctive systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. A randomized study. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1338–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Löndahl M, Katzman P, Nilsson A, Hammarlund C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilitates healing of chronic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(5):998–1003.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Janzing HM, Broos PL. Dermotraction: an effective technique for the closure of fasciotomy wounds: a preliminary report of 15 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:438.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rudolph R, Ballantyne DL. Skin grafts. In: McCarthy JG, editor. Plastic surgery, vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 221–74.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Blackburn JH, Boemi L, Hall WW, et al. Negative pressure dressings as a bolster for skin grafts. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;40:453.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M, et al. The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving skin graft survival. Arch Surg. 2002;137:930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Moiemen NS, Staiano JJ, Ojeh NO, et al. Reconstructive surgery with a dermal regeneration template: clinical and histological study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Frame JD, Still J, Lakhel-LeCoadau A, et al. Use of dermal regeneration template in contracture release procedures: a multicenter evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Iorio ML, Goldstein J, Adams M, Steinberg J, Attinger C. Functional limb salvage in the diabetic patient: the use of a collagen bilayer matrix and risk factors for amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Molnar JA, Defranzo AJ, Hadaegh A, et al. Acceleration of Integra incorporation in complex tissue defects with subatmospheric pressure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Banis JC. Glabrous skin graft for plantar defects. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Paragas LK, Attinger C, Blume PA. Local flaps. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2000;17:267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hallock GG. Distal lower leg local random fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sundell B. Studies in the circulation of pedicle skin flaps. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn Suppl. 1963;53(133):1.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Blume PA, Paragas LK, Sumpio BE, Attinger CE. Single stage surgical treatment for non infected diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hidalgo DA, Shaw WW. Anatomic basis of plantar flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Shaw WW, Hidalgo DA. Anatomic basis of plantar flap design: clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Colen LB, Repogle SL, Mathes SJ. The V–Y plantar flap for reconstruction of the forefoot. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Attinger CE, Ducic I, Cooper P, Zelen CM. The role of intrinsic muscle flaps of the foot for bone coverage in foot and ankle defects in diabetic and non diabetic patients. Plast Reconst Surg. 2002;110:1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Masqualet AC, Gilbert A. An atlas of flaps in limb reconstruction. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co; 1995.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive surgery: principles, anatomy & technique. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston Inc.; 1997.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hughes LA, Mahoney JL. Anatomic basis of local muscle flaps in the distal third of the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:1144.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tobin GR. Hemisoleus and reversed hemi-soleus flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79:407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. The arterial anatomy of skin flaps. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingston; 1994.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Yoshimura M, Imiura S, Shimamura K, et al. Peroneal flap for reconstruction of the extremity: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hasegawa M, Torii S, Katoh H, et al. The distally based sural artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:1012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Baumeister SP, Spierer R, Erdman D, et al. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Masqualet AC, Beveridge J, Romana C. The lateral supramalleolar flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ger R. The management of chronic ulcers of the dorsum of the foot by muscle transposition and free skin grafting. Br J Plast Surg. 1976;29:199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Attinger CE, Cooper P. Soft tissue reconstruction for calcaneal fractures or osteomyelitis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Leitner DW, Gordon L, Buncke HJ. The extensor digitorum brevis as a muscle island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;767:777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Hartrampf CR Jr, Scheflan M, Bostwick J III. The flexor digitorum brevis muscle island pedicle flap, a new dimension in heel reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Morrison WA, Crabb DM, O’Brien BM, et al. The instep of the foot as a fasciocutaneous island flap and as a free flap for heel defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;72:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Harrison DH, Morgan BDG. The instep island flap to resurface plantar defects. Br Jn Plast Surg. 1981;34:315–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Yang D, Yang JF, Morris SF, et al. Medial plantar artery perforator flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the heel. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Grabb WC, Argenta LC. The lateral calcaneal artery skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;68:723–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Yan A, Park S, Icao T, Nakamura N. Reconstruction of a skin defect of the posterior heel by a lateral calcaneal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:642–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    McCraw JB, Furlow LT Jr. The dorsalis pedis arterialized flap: a clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55:177–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Emmet AJJ. The filleted toe flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1976;29:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Snyder GB, Edgerton MT. The principle of island neurovascular flap in the management of ulcerated anaethetic weight-bearing areas of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kaplan I. Neurovascular island flap in the treatment of trophic ulceration of the heel. Br J Plast Surg. 1976;29:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Manson P, Anthenelli RM, Im MJ, et al. The role of oxygen free radicals in ischemic tissue injury in island skin flaps. Ann Surg. 1983;198:87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nassif TM, Vida L, Bovet JL, et al. The parascapular flap: a new cutaneous microsurgical free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(4):591–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jin YT, Cao HP, Chang TS. Clinical applications of the free scapular fascial flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23:170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Colen LB, Bessa GE, Potparic Z. Reconstruction of the extremity with dorsothoracic fascia free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Katseros J, Schusterman M, Beppu M. The lateral upper arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12:489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Koshima I, Fukuda S, Yamamoto H, et al. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Orita Y, Nagayama H. Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ao M, Nagase Y, Mae O, Namba Y. Reconstruction of posttraumatic defects of the foot by flow-through anterolateral or anteromedial thigh flaps with preservation of posterior tibial vessels. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kimura N, Satoh K. Consideration of a thin flap as an entity and clinical applications of the thin anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH, et al. Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Scheufler O, Kalbermatten Pierer G, et al. Instep free flap for plantar soft tissue reconstruction: indications and options. Microsurgery. 2007;27(3):174–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Mathes SJ, Alpert BS, Chang N. Use of the muscle flap in chronic osteomyelitis: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mathes SJ, Feng LG, Hunt TK. Coverage of the infected wound. Ann Surg. 1983;198:420.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Potparić Z, Rajacić N. Long-term results of weight-bearing foot reconstruction with non-innervated and reinnervated free flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(3):176–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    May JW, Halls MJ, Simon SR. Free microvascular muscle flaps with skin graft reconstruction of extensive defects of the foot: a clinical and gait analysis study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:627.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Stevenson TR, Mathes SJ. Management of foot injuries with free muscle flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Hollenbeck ST, Woo S, Komatsu I, et al. Longitudinal outcomes and application of the subunit principle to 165 foot and ankle free tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):924–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Mann RA, Poppen NK, O’Konski M. Amputation of the great toe: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Ortho Relat Res. 1988;226:192.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Armstrong DG, Stacpoole-Shea S, Nguyen H, Harkless LB. Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81-A:535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lin SS, Lee TH, Wapner KL. Plantar forefoot ulceration with equinus deformity of the ankle in diabetic patients: the effect of tendo-Achilles lengthening and total contact casting. Orthopedics. 1996;19:465–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Chrzan JS, Giurini JM, Hurchik JM. A biomechanical model for the transmetatarsal amputation. JAPMA. 1993;83:82.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Barry DC, Sabacinski KA, Habershaw GM, et al. Tendo Achillis procedures for chronic ulcerations in diabetic patients with transmetatarsal amputations. JAPMA. 1993;83:97.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Bowker JH. Partial foot amputations and disarticulations. Foot Ankle. 1997;2:153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew L. Iorio
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Karen Kim Evans
    • 3
  • Christopher E. Attinger
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Children’s Hospital ColoradoGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plastic SurgeryGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA
  4. 4.Wound Healing CenterMedstar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA
  5. 5.Department of Plastic and Orthopedic SurgeryGeorgetown University School of MedicineWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options