Advertisement

“Come, Let’s Away to Prison”: Local and Global Myths, and “Political Shakespeare” in Twenty-First-Century Russia

  • Aleksandra Sakowska
Chapter
Part of the Reproducing Shakespeare book series (RESH)

Abstract

The chapter examines “political Shakespeare” as a local myth that became global. The myth supports a collective narrative about oppressed cultures using Aesopian strategies in the arts to challenge censorship. In the twentieth century, “political Shakespeare” in particular gave a unique identity to Shakespearean performances in Eastern Europe, thus crediting political dimension of Shakespeare’s texts with the ability to resist and fight communist control. A key problem with “political Shakespeare” myth, however, is that it stifles other readings of Shakespearean stagings in Eastern Europe. It also does not allow for problematizing what “the political” in theatre means, how it is achieved, and how often unsuccessful it is. The chapter tests this myth by analysing two modern Russian productions by Konstantin Bogomolov and Nikolai Kolyada.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, and Bertold Brecht. 1977. Aesthetics and Politics. London/New York: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bogomolov, Konstantin. 2012. Bogomołow: Królestwo Leara jak III Rzesza i Związek Radziecki [Bogomolov: Lear’s Kingdom Like the Third Reich or the Soviet Union]. Interview by Miroslaw Baran. Gazeta Wyborcza Daily, August 1. http://www.e-teatr.pl/pl/artykuly/143855,druk.html.
  3. Delabastita, Dirk. 2008. Anthologies, Translations, and European Identities. In Shakespeare and European Politics, ed. Dirk Delabastita, Jozef de Vos, and Paul Franssen, 343–368. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dementsova, Emiilia. 2017. What Is the Relationship Between the Spectator, Theatre, and the State? The Theatre Times, July 28. https://thetheatretimes.com/threesome-tango-spectator-theatre-state/.
  5. Dobson, Michael, and Stanley Wells, eds. 2001. The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Englar, Balz, and L. Bezzola Lambert, eds. 2004. Shifting the Scene: Shakespeare in European Culture. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  7. Freedman, John. 2012. A Playwright for Putin. Moscow Times, January 25. http://www.russialist.org/archives/russia-playwright-for-putin-268.php.
  8. Frye, Northrop. 2000. Creation and Recreation. In Northrop Frye on Religion, ed. Alvin A. Lee and Jean O’Grady, vol. 4, 35–82. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerould, Daniel S. 1967. Literary Values in Theatrical Performances: “King Lear” on Stage. Educational Theatre Journal 19 (3): 311–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/3205239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruszczyński, Piotr, ed. 2007. Szekspir i uzurpator [Shakespeare and Usurper]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.Google Scholar
  11. Hanukai, Maksim. 2015. No More Drama: ‘Who In Russia Lives Well?’ N + 1 Online Magazine, December 21. https://nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/no-more-drama/.
  12. Kaczorowski, Tomasz. 2012. NowotwórtrawiącyświatwedługBogomolova [Cancer Eating the World as Told by Bogomolov]. NowaSilaKrytyczna, August 2. http://tomaszkaczorowski.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/lear-komedia-teatr-prijut-komedianta.html.
  13. Karas, Alena. 2012. Lear in the Country of Bolsheviks. RG.RU Rossiyskaya Gazeta, January 31. http://www.rg.ru/2012/01/31/lir.html.
  14. Kolyada, Nikolai. 2011. Nikołaj Kolada: ‘Szekspir jest dobrą marką’ [Nikolai Kolyada: Shakespeare Is a Good Brand]. Interview by Magdalena Hajdysz. Gazeta Wyborcza Daily, August 6. http://www.e-teatr.pl/pl/artykuly/121929,druk.html.
  15. Komorowski, Jaroslaw. 2011. Nie Tylko Shakespeare [Not Only Shakespeare]. Warsaw: Instytut Sztuki PAN.Google Scholar
  16. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levinskaya, Elena. 2012. Without Aesopian Language. Театр. (8), August. http://oteatre.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/teatr-8.pdf.
  18. Litvin, Margaret. 2011. Hamlet’s Arab Journey: Shakespeare’s Prince and Nasser’s Ghost. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maan, Ajit K. 1999. Internarrative Identity. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  20. Mikhoels, Solomon. 1960. Essay, Speeches, and Articles. Moscow: Art Publishing House.Google Scholar
  21. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1961. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  22. Perisiera, Silvia. 2011. Asking for Narratives to Be Recognized. The Moral of Histories. Études Ricœuriennes/Ricœur Studies 2 (1): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2011.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ricoeur, Paul. 2005. The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ruble, Blair A. 2011. Ural’s Pathfinder: ‘Theatre in Post-Soviet Yekaterinburg. The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Kennan Institute Occasional Papers, Occasional Paper No. 307. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/OP307FINAL.pdf.
  25. Sakowska, Aleksandra. 2011a. No ‘Happy Wrecks’- Pessimism and Suffering in Krzysztof Warlikowski’s Adaptation of The Tempest by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare Bulletin 29 (3, Fall): 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2011.0048.
  26. Sanders, Julie. 2006. Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Shestakova, Anna, ed. 2012. What Does Political Theatre Mean? Театр. (8), August. http://oteatre.info/chto-takoe-politicheskij-teatr-opros-izvestnyh-moskovskih-rezhisserov-i-hudrukov/.
  28. Shevtsova, Maria. 2016. Political Theatre in Europe: East to West, 2007–2014. New Theatre Quarterly 32 (2): 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X1600004X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shtchagina, Svetlana. 2011. НЕЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКАЯ КОМЕДИЯ [Inhuman Comedy]. Petersburg Theatre Magazine, September 28. http://ptj.spb.ru/blog/nechelovecheskaya-komediya/.
  30. Shurbanov, Alexander, and Boika Sokolova. 2001. Painting Shakespeare Red. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  31. Smorodinskaya, Tatiana, Karen Evans-Romaine, and Helena Goscilo, eds. 2007. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Russian Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Sologub, Fyodor. 1917. Theatre –Temple. Theatre and Art (3): 50–52.Google Scholar
  33. Stanton, Sarah, and Stanley Wells, eds. 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Stříbrný, Zdeněk. 2000. Shakespeare in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tran, Diep. 2017. Russian Theatre: A Delicate Balance. American Theatre, July/August 2017, August 8, 2017. http://www.americantheatre.org/2017/08/08/russian-theatre-a-delicate-balance/.
  36. Warden, Claire. 2015. Modernist and Avant-Garde Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandra Sakowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Shakespeare InstituteUniversity of BirminghamLondonUK

Personalised recommendations