Advertisement

Thermoeconomic Analysis and Evaluation of a Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) System Based on Actual Operational Data

  • Arif HepbasliEmail author
  • Mustafa Araz
  • Emrah Biyik
  • Runming Yao
  • Mehdi Shahrestani
  • Emmanuel Essah
  • Li Shao
  • Armando C. Oliveira
  • Teodosio del Caño
  • Elena Rico
  • Juan Luis Lechón
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

In this chapter, we considered a building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system, which was installed at Yasar University in Izmir, Turkey, within the framework of an EU/FP7-funded project and has been successfully operated since February 8, 2016. The BIPV system consists of 48 crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules in 4 rows and 12 columns, and the total capacity is 7.44 kWp. We applied the specific exergy costing (SPECO) method to the BIPV system for the first time to the best of the authors’ knowledge. In this regard, we briefly introduced the BIPV system in this study first. We then used the SPECO method for assessing the performance of the BIPV system. Exergetic costs associated with the generated electricity varied between 0.21 and 0.36 €/kWhex for the selected days, with an average exergetic cost of 0.368 €/kWhex for the whole year.

Keywords

Exergy Exergoeconomic Thermoeconomic SPECO Building-integrated photovoltaic BIPV Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The presented work was developed within the framework of project “REELCOOP – Research Cooperation in Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation,” co-funded by the European Commission (FP7 ENERGY.2013.2.9.1, Grant agreement no: 608466). The authors would like to thank the three reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments, which have been very useful in improving the quality of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Hepbasli A, Biyik E, Araz M, Shahrestani M, Yao R, Essah E, Shao L, Oliveira AC Del Caño T, Rico E, Lechón JL (2016) Exergoeconomic assessment of a building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system: a case study of Yasar University, Izmir, Turkey. In: The international conference of SDB16, Chongqing, China, 5–6 November 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barkaszi S, Dunlop J (2001) Discussion of strategies for mounting photovoltaic arrays on rooftops. In: International solar energy conference, Washington, DC, USA, pp 333–338 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henemann A (2008) BIPV: Built-in solar energy. Renew Energy Focus 9(14):16–19Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biyik E, Araz M, Hepbasli A, Shahrestani M, Yao R, Shao L, Essah E, Oliveira AC, Del Caño T, Rico E, Lechón JL, Andrade L, Mendes A, Atli YB (2017) A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. Int J Eng Sci Technol 20(3):833–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsatsaronis G (2007) Definition and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics. Energy 32(4):249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2016) Exergetic assessment of BIPV module using parametric and photonic energy methods: a review. Energ Buildings 119:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaur A, Tiwari GN (2014) Exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic analysis of photovoltaic modules of different solar cells. J Sol Energy. Article ID 719424, 8 pages,  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/719424
  8. 8.
    REELCOOP (2015) Research cooperation in renewable energy technologies for electricity generation report. Seventh Framework Programme of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rawat R, Lamba R, Kaushik SC (2017) Thermodynamic study of solar photovoltaic energy conversion: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 71:630–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petela R (2003) Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation. Sol Energy 74:469–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazzaretto A, Tsatsaronis G (2006) SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31:1257–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Macaluso A, Piacentiono A, Vanol L (2016) Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel hybrid solar-geothermal polygeneration system producing energy and water. Energy Convers Manag 115:200–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agrawal B, Tiwari GN (2011) Building integrated photovoltaic thermal systems for sustainable developments, RSC Energy Series No. 4, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arif Hepbasli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mustafa Araz
    • 1
  • Emrah Biyik
    • 1
  • Runming Yao
    • 2
  • Mehdi Shahrestani
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Essah
    • 2
  • Li Shao
    • 2
  • Armando C. Oliveira
    • 3
  • Teodosio del Caño
    • 4
  • Elena Rico
    • 4
  • Juan Luis Lechón
    • 4
  1. 1.Energy Systems EngineeringYasar UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.School of the Built EnvironmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  4. 4.Onyx Solar EnergyAvilaSpain

Personalised recommendations