Advertisement

Simulation Environments

  • Vicki Moran
  • Rita Wunderlich
  • Cynthia Rubbelke
Chapter

Abstract

Simulation environments are important for the realism of the simulation experience. Various modalities and fidelities should be considered and structured to meet the course objectives. Standardized patients offer an opportunity for live patient interaction in simulation. A theoretical background and evaluation of the effectiveness of the simulation experience should be developed and measured.

Keywords

Environment Standardized patient Fidelity Self-efficacy Confidence Competence 

References

  1. Al-Ghareeb A, Cooper SJ (2016) Barriers and enablers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation manikins in nurse education: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today 36:281–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson M, Holmes TL, LeFlore JL, Nelson KA, Jenkins T (2010) Standardized patients in educating student nurses: one school’s experience. Clin Simul Nurs 6(2):e61–e66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne J, Heavey C, Byrne P (2010) A review of web-based simulations and supporting tools. Simul Modell Pract Theory 18:253–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cant RP, Cooper SJ (2017) Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review. Nurse Educ Today 49:63–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper S, Cant R, Bogossian F, Kinsman L, Bucknall T, the First ACT Research Team (2015) Patient deterioration education: evaluation of face-to-face simulation and e-simulation approaches. Clin Simul Nurs 11(2):94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doolen J, Mariani B, Atz T, Horsley TL, O’Rourke J, McAfee K, Cross CL (2016) High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: Aareview of simulation reviews. Clin Simul Nurs 12:290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn KE, Osborne C, Link HJ (2014) High-fidelity simulation and nursing student self-efficacy: does training help the little engines know they can? Nurs Educ Perspect 35(6):403–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elfrink Cordi VL, Leighton K, Ryan-Wenger N, Doyle TJ, Ravert P (2012) History and development of the simulation effectiveness tool (SET). Clin Simul Nurs 8:e199–e210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kameg KM, Szpak JL, Cline TW, McDermott DS (2014) Utilization of standardized patients to decrease nursing student anxiety. Clin Simul Nurs 10(11):567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy E, Murphy GT, Misener RM, Alder R (2015) Development and psychometric assessment of the nursing competence self-efficacy scale. J Nurs Educ 54(10):550–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Keiser MM, Turkelson C (2017) Using students as standardized patients: development, implementation, and evaluation of a standardized patient training program. Clin Simul Nurs 13:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liao CS, Kao SP, Liang SY, Hsieh MC (2015) Training actors as standardized patients. Tzu Chi Med J 27(2):96–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcmj.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pai HC (2016) Development and validation of the simulation learning effectiveness scale for nursing students. J Clin Nurs 25:3373–3381.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13463 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rutherford-Hemming T (2012) Learning in simulated environments: effect on learning transfer and clinical skill acquisition in nurse practitioner students. J Nurs Educ 51(7):403–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarmasoglu S, Dinc L, Elcin M (2016) Using standardized patients in nursing education: effects on students’ psychomotor skill development. Nurse Educ 41(2):e1–e5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schlegel C, Shaha M, Terhaar M (2009) The value of standardized patient in nursing education. J Nurs Sci 27(2):40–48Google Scholar
  18. Stump GS, Husman J, Brem SK (2012) The nursing student self-efficacy scale: development using item response theory. Nurs Res 61(3):149–158.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e318253a750 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Vincent MA, Sheriff S, Mellott S (2015) The efficacy of high-fidelity simulation on psychomotor clinical performance improvement of undergraduate nursing students. Comput Inform Nurs 33(2):78–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki Moran
    • 1
  • Rita Wunderlich
    • 2
  • Cynthia Rubbelke
    • 1
  1. 1.School of NursingSaint Louis UniversitySaint LouisUSA
  2. 2.McAuley School of NursingMaryville University McAuley School of NursingSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations