Advertisement

Chaucerotics pp 289-302 | Cite as

Conclusion: Uncloaking the Language of Sex in The Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Criseyde

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

In the Conclusion to his book, Gust uses material from Book Five of Troilus and Criseyde to drive home the argument that there are distinct strands of historical connection between pre- and post-modern pornographic artistry. As Gust illustrates throughout his study, the sexually suggestive language used by Geoffrey Chaucer evidently carried with it an erotic charge that could stimulate and sexually titillate various literary audiences in late medieval England. In sum, the notion of Chaucerotics is shown to be a useful theoretical concept that brings to light that certain sections of Chaucer’s writing did carry pornographic possibilities to his medieval audience, while scholarly readers—past and present—have too often undersold the erotic potential of Chaucerian sex in The Canterbury Tales and beyond.

Works Cited

  1. Braddy, Haldeen. 1969. Chaucer—Realism or Obscenity? The Arlington Quarterly 2 (1): 121–138.Google Scholar
  2. Dollimore, Jonathan. 2001. Sex, Literature and Censorship. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Donaghue, Chris. 2015. Sex Outside the Lines: Authentic Sexuality in a Sexually Dysfunctional Culture. Dallas: BenBella Books.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, E.T. 1970a. Criseide and Her Narrator. In Speaking of Chaucer, 65–83. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1970b. The Masculine Narrator and Four Women of Style. In Speaking of Chaucer, 46–64. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Gorer, Geoffrey. 1934. The Marquis de Sade: A Short Account of His Life and Work. Livewright Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Gust, Geoffrey W. 2009. Constructing Chaucer: Author and Autofiction in the Critical Tradition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Homer. 1990. The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, Molly A. 2008. Troilus’s Gaze and the Collapse of Masculinity in Romance. In Men and Masculinities in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, ed. Tison Pugh and Marcia Smith Marzec, 132–147. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  10. The Riverside Chaucer. 1987. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Wagner, Peter. 1988. Eros Revived: Erotica of the Enlightenment in England and America. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  12. Warhol, Andy. 1975. The Philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and Back Again. Orlando: Harcourt Books.Google Scholar
  13. Webster’s Dictionary. Available online at http://www.merriam-webster.com/.
  14. Wurtzel, Elizabeth. 1999. Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
    • 1
  1. 1.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations