Advertisement

Chaucerotics pp 111-140 | Cite as

“On this goode wyf he leith on soore”: The Brutal Chauceroticism of The Reeve’s Tale

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

This chapter presents the second test case for the prospective meanings of Chaucerotics by examining The Reeve’s Tale. In this poem, the “cloak of language” is shown to veil a far different, darker variety of Chauceroticism that has made many critics uneasy. Recalling that early forms of pornography were commonly satirical rather than overtly sensual, Gust demonstrates that The Reeve’s Tale is a work in which Chaucer thoroughly pushes social boundaries through bold and brazen erotic content, revealing—if not reveling in—the illicit underside of medieval sexuality. This is the dark side of Chaucerian sex, as the poet forces readers to acknowledge deviant sexual behaviors that may not be morally acceptable to many, but are a viable part of sexual endeavor for some.

Works Cited

  1. Benson, C. David. 1986. Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blamires, Alcuin. 2006. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breuer, Heidi. 2008. Being Intolerant: Rape is not Seduction (in “The Reeve’s Tale” or Anywhere Else). In The Canterbury Tales Revisited: 21st Century Interpretations, ed. Kathleen A. Bishop, 1–15. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, Peter. 1980. The Containment of Symkyn: The Function of Space in the Reeve’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 14 (3): 225–236.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, Helen. 1996. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crocker, Holly. 2007. Affective Politics in Chaucer’s Reeve’s Tale: “Cherl” Masculinity After 1381. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 29: 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curry, Walter Clyde. 1960. Chaucer and the Mediaeval Sciences. Rev. and Enlarged (2nd) ed. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. David, Alfred. 1976. The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Delasanta, Rodney. n.d. The Mill in Chaucer’s Reeve’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 36 (3): 270–276.Google Scholar
  10. Everest, Carol. 1996. Sex and Old Age in Chaucer’s Reeve’s Prologue. The Chaucer Review 31 (2): 99–114.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction. Originally published in France in 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Green, Richard Firth. 2011. Cecily Champain v. Geoffrey Chaucer: A New Look at an Old Dispute. In Law and Sovereignty and the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, ed. Robert Sturges, 261–285. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  13. Heffernan, Carol. 2004. Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale and Reeve’s Tale, Boccaccio’s Decameron, and the French Fabliaux. Italica 81 (3): 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knapp, Peggy. 2008. Chaucerian Aesthetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohanski, Tamarah. 1993. In Search of Malyne. The Chaucer Review 27 (3): 228–238.Google Scholar
  16. Kolve, V.A. 1984. Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lancashire, Ian. 1972. Sexual Innuendo in the Reeve’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 6 (3): 159–170.Google Scholar
  18. The Literary Context of Chaucer’s Fabliaux: Texts and Translations. 1971. Edited by Larry D. Benson and Theodore M. Andersson. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Olson, Glending. 1974. The Medieval Theory of Literature for Refreshment and Its Use in the Fabliau Tradition. Studies in Philology 71: 291–313.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1982. Literature as Recreation in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pearsall, Derek. 1985. The Canterbury Tales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1992. Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, Helen. 2000. An Introduction to the Canterbury Tales: Reading, Fiction, Context. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pigg, Daniel F. 1998. Performing the Perverse: The Abuse of Masculine Power in The Reeve’s Tale. In Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Criseyde, ed. Peter G. Beidler, p. 54 [53–61]. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  25. Plummer, John. 1983. Hooly Chirches Blood: Simony and Patrimony in Chaucer’s Reeve’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 18 (1): 49–60.Google Scholar
  26. Pugh, Tison. 2004. Queering Medieval Genres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Richardson, Janette. 1970. Blameth Nat Me: A Study of Imagery in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. The Hague: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. The Riverside Chaucer. 1987. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. Saunders, Corinne. 2001. Rape and Ravishment in the Literature of Medieval England. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  30. Sidhu, Nicole. 2009. “To Late for to Crie”: Female Desire, Fabliau Politics, and Classical Legend in the Reeve’s Tale. Exemplaria 21 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vartanian, Aram. 1977. La Mettrie, Diderot, and Sexology in the Enlightenment. In Essays on the Age of Enlightenment in Honor of Ira O. Wade, ed. Jean Macary et al., 347–367. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  32. White, Sarah Melhaldo. 1982. Sexual Language and Human Conflict in Old French Fabliaux. Comparative Studies in Society and History 24 (2): 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woods, William. 1996. Society and Nature in the Cook’s Tale. Papers on Language and Literature 32 (2): 189–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
    • 1
  1. 1.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations