Advertisement

Chaucerotics pp 77-109 | Cite as

“Ther was the revel and the melodye”: The Playful Cloak of Language in The Miller’s Tale

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

This is the first of four chapters on the fabliaux in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Gust begins his examination of these tales by focusing on The Miller’s Tale, which he analyzes and presents as an initial test case for the possible meaning and implications of his theory of Chaucerotics. Through a careful close reading of the poem’s sexualized “cloak of language,” The Miller’s Tale is said to represent an explosively “anti-chivalric” story that challenges the courtesy and piety of the Knight, if not courtly society more broadly. As the second tale in the pilgrimage storytelling contest, The Miller’s Tale is shown to offer a playful erotic model against which subsequent sexual intrigues from The Canterbury Tales may be compared and assessed.

Works Cited

  1. Benson, C. David. 1986. Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, Larry D. 1984. The “Queynte” Punnings of Chaucer’s Critics. Studies in the Age of Chaucer Proceedings 1: 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blamires, Alcuin. 2006. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullón-Fernández, María. 2006. Private Practices in Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 28: 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger, Glenn. 2001. Shameful Pleasures: Up Close and Dirty with Chaucer, Flesh, and the Word. In Queering the Middle Ages, ed. Glenn Burger and Steven Kruger, 213–235. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2003. Chaucer’s Queer Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Camille, Michael. 2006. Dr. Witkowski’s Anus: French Doctors, German Homosexuals and the Obscene in Medieval Church Art. In Medieval Obscenities, ed. Nicola McDonald, 17–38. York, UK: York Medieval Press.Google Scholar
  8. Condren, Edward I. 1985. Transcendent Metaphor or Banal Reality: Three Chaucerian Dilemmas. Papers on Language and Literature 21 (3): 233–257.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, Jon. 1986. Carnival and the Canterbury Tales: “Only equals may laugh” (Herzen). In Medieval Literature: Criticism, Ideology, and History, ed. David Aers, 169–191. The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, Helen. 1996. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cornelius, Michael G. 2009. Sex and Punishment in Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Miller’s Tale”. In Human Sexuality, ed. and intro. Harold Bloom, 95–104. Bloom’s Literary Themes Series. New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism (Chelsea House Publishing).Google Scholar
  12. Curry, Walter Clyde. 1960. Chaucer and the Mediaeval Sciences. Rev. and Enlarged (2nd) ed. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. David, Alfred. 1976. The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Delany, Sheila. 1994. Sexual Economics, Chaucer’s Wife of Bath and The Book of Margery Kemp. In Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature: The Wife Bath and All Her Sect, ed. Ruth Evans and Lesley Johnson, 72–87. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 1992. Chaucer’s Slow-motion Camera and What it Does to the Fabliau. In Telling Stories: Studies in Honour of Ulrich Broich on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, ed. Elmar Lehmann and Bernd Lenz, 1–16. Amsterdam: Grüner.Google Scholar
  16. Dinshaw, Carolyn. 1999. Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre-and Postmodern. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donaldson, E.T. 1970a. The Masculine Narrator and Four Women of Style. In Speaking of Chaucer, 46–64. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1970b. Idiom of Popular Poetry in the Miller’s Tale. In Speaking of Chaucer, 13–29. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Goodall, Peter Goodall. 1996. “Allone, Withouten any Compaignye”: Privacy in the First Fragment of the Canterbury Tales. In Chaucer: Contemporary Critical Essays, ed. Valerie Allen, 30–35. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  20. Hanning, R.W. 1992. Telling the Private Parts: “Pryvetee” and Poetry in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. In The Idea of Medieval Literature: New Essays on Chaucer and Medieval Culture in Honor of Donald R. Howard, ed. James M. Dean and Christian K. Zacher, 108–124. Newark: U of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haselmayer, Louis. 1938. The Portraits in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. Review of English Studies 14 (55): 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heyworth, Gregory Heyworth. 2009. Ineloquent Ends: Simplicitas, Proctolalia, and the Profane Vernacular in the Miller’s Tale. Speculum 84 (4): 956–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hines, John. 1993. The Fabliau in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Kiernan, Kevin S. 1975. The Art of the Descending Catalogue, and a Fresh Look at Alisoun. Chaucer Review 10 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Knapp, Peggy. 2008. Chaucerian Aesthetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolve, V.A. 1984. Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kruger, Steven. 1994. Claiming the Pardoner: Toward a Gay Reading of Chaucer’s Pardoner’s Tale. Exemplaria 6 (1): 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lacan, Jacques. 1977. The Signification of the Phallus. In Écrits: Selection, trans. Alan Sheridan, 281–291. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  29. Leicester, H. Marshall, Jr. 1994. Newer Currents in Psychoanalytic Criticism, and the Difference “it” Makes: Gender and Desire in the Miller’s Tale. ELH 61 (3): 473–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lochrie, Karma. 1994. Women’s “Pryvetees” and Fabliau Politics in the Miller’s Tale. Exemplaria 6 (2): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lombardo, Nicholas. 2012. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madden, William. 1955. Chaucer’s Retraction and Mediaeval Canons of Seemliness. Mediaeval Studies 17: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Middle English Dictionary. Available online at http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.
  34. Miller, Mark. 2000. Naturalism and its Discontents in the Miller’s Tale. ELH 67 (1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan, Gerald. 2010. Obscenity and Fastidiousness in The Miller’s Tale. English Studies 91 (5): 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muscatine, Charles. 1964. Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study of Style and Meaning. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ozick, Cynthia. 2015. The Novel’s Evil Tongue. The New York Times Book Review, December 16.Google Scholar
  38. Patterson, Lee. 1991. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pearsall, Derek. 1985. The Canterbury Tales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Phillips, Helen. 2000. An Introduction to the Canterbury Tales: Reading, Fiction, Context. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  41. Raybin, David. 1996. The Death of a Silent Woman: Voice and Power in Chaucer’s Manciple’s Tale. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 95 (1): 19–37.Google Scholar
  42. Richardson, Janette. 1970. Blameth Nat Me: A Study of Imagery in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. The Hague: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Riverside Chaucer. 1987. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Ross, Thomas W. 1972. Chaucer’s Bawdy. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.Google Scholar
  45. Strohm, Paul. 1989. Social Chaucer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Webster’s Dictionary. Available online at http://www.merriam-webster.com/.
  47. Woods, William. 1996. Society and Nature in the Cook’s Tale. Papers on Language and Literature 32 (2): 189–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
    • 1
  1. 1.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations