Children’s Agency in Translocal Roma Families

  • Anca Enache
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)


This chapter discusses some of the key practices and negotiations of agency that are important in the relationships, communities and geographies of Romanian Roma children. It draws on ethnographic material collected between 2012 and 2014 in various locations in Romania and Finland. Children had an important role in maintaining and shaping family and community ties, as well as in contributing to family income, in the process of which they very often conformed to community and family norms. These were, however, not passive obedient practices but strategic means of gaining family and social prestige, strengthening their own social networks and, therefore, securing their futures. In addition, economic insecurities, housing and spatial deprivation, and racialisation shaped these practices in ways that are likely to be more powerful than in other childhood and mobility settings.


  1. Ackers, Louise. 2000. “From ‘Best Interests’ to Participatory Rights: Children’s Involvement in Family Migration Decisions.” Child and Family Law Quarterly 12 (2): 167–184.Google Scholar
  2. Benedikt, Stefan. 2010. “Harming ‘Cultural Feelings’: Images and Categorisation of Temporary Romani Migrants to Graz/Austria.” In Multi-disciplinary Approaches to Romany Studies, edited by Michael Stewart and Márton Rövid, 71–88. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blazek, Matej. 2011. “Place, Children’s Friendships, and the Formation of Gender Identities in a Slovak Urban Neighbourhood.” Children’s Geographies 9 (3–4): 285–302. Scholar
  4. Brannen, Julia, and Margaret O’Brien. 1995. “Childhood and the Sociological Gaze: Paradigms and Paradoxes.” Sociology 29 (4): 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, Pia Haudrup. 2004. “Children’s Participation in Ethnographic Research: Issues of Power and Representation.” Children and Society 18 (2): 165–176. Scholar
  6. Dalgas, Karina Märcher, and Karen Fog Olwig. 2015. “Local and Transnational Care Relations: Relatedness and Family Practice Among Au Pairs in Denmark.” Global Networks 15 (4): 469–484. Scholar
  7. Dyson, Jane. 2014. Working Childhoods: Youth, Agency and the Environment in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engebrigtsen, Ada I. 2007. Exploring Gypsiness: Power, Exchange and Interdependence in a Transylvanian Village. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  9. Grill, Jan. 2012a. “‘Going Up to England’: Exploring Mobilities Among Roma from Eastern Slovakia.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (8): 1269–1287. Scholar
  10. Grill, Jan. 2012b. “‘It’s Building Up to Something and It Won’t Be Nice When It Erupts’: The Making of Roma/Gypsy Migrants in Post-industrial Scotland.” Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 62: 42–54.
  11. Heath, Sue, Vikki Charles, Graham Crow, and Rose Wiles. 2007. “Informed Consent, Gatekeepers and Go-Betweens: Negotiating Consent in Child and Youth-Oriented Institutions.” British Educational Research Journal 33 (3): 403–417. Scholar
  12. Jensen, An-Magritt, and Lorna McKee. 2003. “Introduction: Theorizing Childhood and Family Change.” In Children and the Changing Family: Between Transformation and Negotiation, edited by An-Magritt Jensen and Lorna McKee, 1–13. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lulle, Aija, and Laura Assmuth. 2013. “Families on the Move in Europe: Children’s Perspectives.” Siirtolaisuus-Migration 40 (3): 3–10.Google Scholar
  14. Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marcus, George. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayall, Berry. 2000. “Conversations with Children: Working with Generational Issues.” In Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, edited by Pia Christensen and Allison James, 120–135. London and New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  17. Okely, Judith. 1975. “Gypsy Women: Models in Conflict.” In Perceiving Women, edited by Shirley Ardener, 55–86. London: Malaby Press.Google Scholar
  18. Punch, Samantha. 2005. “The Generationing of Power: A Comparison of Child-Parent and Sibling Relations in Scotland.” In Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, vol. 10, edited by Loretta Bass, 169–188.Google Scholar
  19. Sigona, Nando. 2005. “Locating ‘The Gypsy Problem’. The Roma in Italy: Stereotyping, Labelling and ‘Nomad Camps’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (4): 741–756. Scholar
  20. Stack, Steven. 1997. “A Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Domestic Institutions on Suicide Ideology.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 28 (3): 304–319.Google Scholar
  21. Stewart, Michael. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies (Studies in the Ethnographic Imagination). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tervonen, Miika, and Anca Enache. 2017. “Coping with Everyday Bordering: Roma Migrants and Gatekeepers in Helsinki.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (7): 1114–1131. Scholar
  23. Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Vrăbiescu, Ioana. 2017. “Roma Migrant Children in Catalonia: Between the Politics of Benevolence and the Normalization of Violence.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (10): 1663–1680. Scholar
  25. Yuval-Davis, Nira, Viktor Varjú, Miika Tervonen, Jamie Hakim, and Mastoureh Fathi. 2017. “Press Discourses on Roma in the UK, Finland and Hungary.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (7): 1151–1169. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anca Enache
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations